If they refunded the illegally deducted amount, then automatic message must reveal it unfortunately not so, Vidya Devi sufferer



Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/45754
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
25/08/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-60000210106062 आवेदक का नाम- Yogi M P Singh प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक23-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-Payment of pension is pending before chief treasury office Mirzapur. Why are they procrastinating, I do not know. Police may ask the ulterior motive of the chief treasury officer to procrastinate on the matter unnecessarily.Chief Treasury officer Mirzapur may provide the sought information to the information seeker if the every thing is O.K. in the office of the Treasury officer Mirzapur.
Treasury officer Mirzapur who is also the public information officer of his department may provide the following information point wise as follows.
 1- Posting detail of Chief Treasury officer Mirzapur and Account officers in the treasury office posted in the district Mirzapur in the last 10 years.
 2-Posting details of class three employees in treasury office including date of joining in the district with name and designation. 
3-If any current staff was earlier posted in the district and later transferred and now working as second time posting, then posting details of such staffs and earlier posting details must also be made available. 
4-Whatever information is voluntarily disclosed by the public authority treasury office under subsection 1 b of section 4 of Right to Information Act 2005, which must be provided to access to the information seeker. 
5-If any staff of the treasury office is facing corruption charges and enquiry of such charges is pending or enforced, then this must be made available to the information seeker.6-Provide cause of delay in processing the family pension of Smt. Vidya Devi W/O Rajendra Pratap Singh. For detail vide attached document to RTI request.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
11/10/2021
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित संलांग कार्यालय के पत्र संख्या 873 दिनांक 07.10.2021 का अवलोकन करने का कष्ट करे
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
The matter concerns two times deduction was raised before the bank concerned, but they provided unsatisfactory reply as follows, which is itself proving their ulterior motives. From the attached report of the branch manager, it is quite obvious that his attached report must be in three pages as he has stated in its report that this report contains the photocopy of the communication exchanged between him and chief treasury officer as well as he had to provide the latest status of the account, but unfortunately he did not do anything. Undoubtedly he procrastinated too much on the matter. His dealings are quite unsatisfactorily. Here most important question is that why there is no accountability in the working of the treasury officer and concerned bank, which played cryptic role through the entire episode. Whether wrongdoings can be allowed in the name of human errors as done by the concerned public authority ipso facto. Whether well-planned wrongdoings can be concealed in this way.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. The matter concerns two times deduction was raised before the bank concerned, but they provided unsatisfactory reply as follows, which is itself proving their ulterior motives.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post