Grievance Status for registration number: GOVMH/E/2021/03512
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
28/06/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Maharashtra
Grievance Description
Sir, the applicant knows only two languages which are Hindi and English and here they have said that action taken by the subordinate office but what action taken by the subordinate office I could not understand as its script was in Marathi and applicant does not know the Marathi language, they did not take any action and misled the applicant by writing voluminous papers in Marathi which applicant could not understand. They may provide the report either in English or Hindi so that applicants may submit counter submissions. It is a fact that the Maharashtra government lacks multilinguist officers or most of the government officers are corrupt. As matter of fact concerns the bounce of the cheque but they put the carpet on the entire matter and shielded the wrongdoers. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVMH/E/2019/05546
Grievance Concerns to Name of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 15/09/2019
Received By Ministry/Department Maharashtra
Grievance Description
An application on behalf of Mahendra Kumar Maurya who was cheated by Proprietor H.K.G.N. Transport, Transport, Contractor and commission agent, In front of collector office, Amgaon Road, Fulchur, Gondia PIN Code-441601 Maharashtra. Mobile numbers-9850426073,8554065890, 8378817635.To
District Magistrate And District Collector Gondia
District-Gondia Province-Maharashtra , India
Subject-Aforementioned company is operating its business illegally by opening the office in the Gondia district of Maharashtra so it is obligatory duty of the District Magistrate concerned to be instrumental in providing justice to aggrieved applicant Mahendra Kumar Maurya. Concerned police may be directed to lodge F.I.R. of cheque bounce and latter also not received the notice served under section 138 negotiable instrument act 138 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account by the aggrieved applicant Mahendra Kumar Maurya. Vide attached documents in P.D.F. form to the grievance.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
01/07/2021
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
SHRI M.A. GUTTE
Officer Designation
DEPUTY SECRETARY
Contact Address
REVENUE DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA MUMBAI
Email Address
guttemanik@gmail.com
Contact Number
02222850919
Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)
Reminder Date
Remarks
24/07/2021
Sir, already there is undue delay on the part of the transport company so in the interest justice, process of enquiry may be accelerated for speedy disposal of the matter. Justice delayed is justice denied must be taken into consideration. Undoubtedly due care must be paid to matter as such cases of cheating is blot on the image of our society which is not only bilateral matter but an offence to society. Credibility of our society is going down because of such wrongdoers.
On 03/02/2020, the applicant reminded in the grievance dated as Grievance Status for registration number : GOVMH/E/2019/05546
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt 15/09/2019 Honourable sir your applicant knows only two languages first international language English and second mother tongue Hindi so he must not be sent those Communications which may be in Marathi regional language of the Maharashtra. Undoubtedly your applicant respects entire languages but what is the benefit if we can not cannot understand the Marathi so entire Communications may be made available either in Hindi language or in English.
Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2019/30159
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
28/08/2019
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description
On behalf of Mahendra Kumar Maurya under Article 51 a of the constitution of India. Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2019/29223 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh. Date of Receipt-21/08/2019, Matter of fact is concerned with the procrastination and inordinate delay being made by the staffs of the Allahabad bank of Gondia branch of Allahabad bank in Maharashtra. Cheque was received in the office of the Gondia branch of the Allahabad bank on 09-Aug-2019 for the payment to aggrieved applicant Mahendra Kumar Maurya in his account number-20895418543. Dipti Srivastava designation-General Manager replies as-
Complainant has been requested to visit the branch for more information in this regard. Same has been conveyed to the complainant, Hence, we request you to close this complaint. Sir whether any one will explain that when aforementioned officer neither touched the submissions of the grievance nor provided logistic reply, then how the accountable public functionaries considered the grievance disposed. A Cheque Bounce case is a criminal case envisaged under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. How the Allahabad bank can be silent on the issue of fraud through the bank and cheaters used the bank as instrument in order to cheat an innocent law abiding citizen. Concerned staff must provide the feedback regarding the bounce of concerned cheque as it is cheating and punishable under Indian Penal code. According to rule, notice has to be served to concerned party within 30 days after the clarification of the bank in regard to bounce of the cheque concerned.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
29/08/2019
Remarks
The cheque was bounced due to insufficient fund n the account. Therefore,we request for the closure of this complaint.
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
The matter concerns with check bounce but the police concerned acting like judge instead of acting in accordance with the law of land so that wrongdoer elements who provided Bounce cheque may be subjected to the panel proceedings of the law of land which is quite obvious from the post and moreover they have provided enquiry reports in the Marathi. They were well apprised of the fact that the applicant cannot understand Marathi because he knows only two languages Hindi and English.If the cheque is bounced, then it is criminal matter and police concerned must take action on it. But the factual position is that police itself shielding the wrongdoers which is mockery of the law of land and must not be allowed. Few days ago a senior rank officer of the police found indulged in the criminal activities of extortion. If our police personnel pursuing the path of crimes, then it must be tackled with utmost precautions.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
S V L N NAGESWARA RAO
Officer Designation
General Manager
Contact Address
Email Address
ho.cgrc@allahabadbank.in
Contact Number
03322420901
Tags:
Corruption
Section 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account.
ReplyDelete1[Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provision of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 2[a term which may be extended to two years], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both:
If the wrongdoings committed under the law of the land then it is obligatory duty of the police that it may register a first information report in the matter so that justice may be available to the victim.
ReplyDeleteHere role of the police is cryptic instead of resolving the dispute by pursuing the appropriate path police is playing cryptic role by replying in the Marathi language which can not be understood by the representative of the aggrieved person as he does not understand Marathi.
How the police is justified in its act if the cheque provided by the person bounced in the the bank which means he has seated the complainant. If the accused person is genuine one then he had to provide the 30000 rupees letter on but he did not do so which means he deliberately cheated the poor complainant.
ReplyDeleteIt is factual position that cheque of rupees 30000 provided by the transport company is bounced because of the lack of money in the bank account of the company which means company deliberately provided the check which is to be bounced otherwise they had to provide the 30,000 money letter by issuing the other check but not done by them.
ReplyDeleteCheque Bounce is a criminal offence so it is obligatory duty of the police concerned to register First Information Report in the matter so that action may be taken against the wrongdoer Who cheated aggrieved individual.
ReplyDelete