Undoubtedly, they have registered case under section 323,504 and 325 of I.P.C. but the effective action on the part of police is zero

 


Online RTI First Appeal Status Form

Enter Registration Number PMOIN/A/E/21/00378

Name Kiran Singh

Date of filing 02/06/2021

Public Authority Prime Minister's Office

Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Date of action 02/06/2021

Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 23074072, Email Id:- rti.appeal@gov.in

Nodal Officer Details :-

Telephone Number 23074072

Email Id rti-pmo[dot]applications[at]gov[dot]in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

RTI Appeal Details :-

   

RTI Appeal Registration number PMOIN/A/E/21/00378

Public Authority Prime Minister's Office

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number PMOIN/R/E/21/02380

Request Registration Date 28/05/2021

Name Kiran Singh

Gender Female

Address Village Kothara Kantit , Post Shree Nivas Dham, District Mirzapur

Pincode 231313

Country India

State

Status Rural

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number Details not provided

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No

Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

CPIO of Public Authority approached Amit Agrawal

CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided

CPIO's Order/Decision Date

(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

Prayer or Relief Sought

Mr. First Appellate Authority Right to Information Act 2005 is the special Act passed for specific purpose to provide information to citizens of this country dealing with the provisions available under Right to Information Act 2005. CPIO denial of sought information is arbitrary and ultra vires to the provisions of Right to Information Act.  According to subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005, it shall be obligatory duty of every public authority to provide reasons for its decisions to parties concerned. It is unfortunate that decisions of CPIO denying sought information is corrupt, arbitrary and cryptic in nature and showing he is incompetent for the post of CP[O ipso facto. CPIO is acting against the spirit of RTI Act 2005. 


Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB) Supporting document not provided


Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2021/0386236

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Kiran Singh

Date of Receipt

26/05/2021

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

The matter concerns to register F.I.R. which is still not registered by the Jigana police station. Detail of the aggrieved is as follows.Name of the aggrieved-Kiran Singh W/O Late Mr. Jagdish Singh Address-Village-Kothara Kanti, Balua, Post-Shree Nivas Dham, Police station-JiganaDistrict-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Date of incidence took place-26/05/2021, Time of tragic incidence  took place-9:30 i.e. half past nine o clock in the morning.Brief description of the incidence-Family members had gone to Jigana police as opposition had brutally assaulted the family member at 7:30 and Jigana police registered F.I.R. in the the matter at the time 8:51 quite obvious from the attached document to this representation.At 8:00 o clock in the Morning 100 number police reached to site but offender fled from the spot. When the police returned back , offenders returned to home. Two women named Priya Singh W/O Dileep Singh and Reeta Singh W/O Jaydheer Singh abused the applicant later on physically assaulted and during assault, male members who fled away from home because of fear of police came back attacked the applicant with sticks quite obvious from injuries on the legs shown to the station officer Jigana. Name of these two offenders are 1-Dileep Singh S/O Raghuwar Dayal Singh and 2-Jaydheer Singh S/O/ Raghuwar Dayal Singh.They were also supported by Nagendra Singh S/O Jaydheer Singh. 

Written representation submitted before the station officer Jigana Police station who instead of directing to register F.I.R. in the matter directed subordinate to carry out investigation. Therefore he must be directed to lodge F.I.R. in the matter of widow as required under the law of land. The matter concerns with the widow so in order to provide justice concerned may take swift action in the matter as this is third repeated attack on the family of the aggrieved by the alleged law breaker opposition party.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Under process   

Date of Action

31/05/2021

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey

Officer Designation

Joint Secretary

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

2226350

संदर्भ संख्या : 40019921008329, दिनांक - 10 Jun 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40019921008329

आवेदक का नाम-Kiran Singhविषय-The matter concerns to register F.I.R. which is still not registered by the Jigana police station. Detail of the aggrieved is as follows.Name of the aggrieved-Kiran Singh W/O Late Mr. Jagdish Singh Address-Village-Kothara Kanti, Balua, Post-Shree Nivas Dham, Police station-JiganaDistrict-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Date of incidence took place-26/05/2021, Time of tragic incidence  took place-9:30 i.e. half past nine o clock in the morning.Brief description of the incidence-Family members had gone to Jigana police as opposition had brutally assaulted the family member at 7:30 and Jigana police registered F.I.R. in the the matter at the time 8:51 quite obvious from the attached document to this representation.At 8:00 o clock in the Morning 100 number police reached to site but offender fled from the spot. When the police returned back , offenders returned to home. Two women named Priya Singh W/O Dileep Singh and Reeta Singh W/O Jaydheer Singh abused the applicant later on physically assaulted and during assault, male members who fled away from home because of fear of police came back attacked the applicant with sticks quite obvious from injuries on the legs shown to the station officer Jigana. Name of these two offenders are 1-Dileep Singh S/O Raghuwar Dayal Singh and 2-Jaydheer Singh S/O/ Raghuwar Dayal Singh.They were also supported by Nagendra Singh S/O Jaydheer Singh.  Written representation submitted before the station officer Jigana Police station who instead of directing to register F.I.R. in the matter directed subordinate to carry out investigation. Therefore he must be directed to lodge F.I.R. in the matter of widow as required under the law of land. The matter concerns with the widow so in order to provide justice concerned may take swift action in the matter as this is third repeated attack on the family of the aggrieved by the alleged law breaker opposition party.  

विभाग -पुलिसशिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-02-06-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -थाना स्तरपद -थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक06-06-2021 को फीडबैक:-शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा बताया गया है की अधिकारी द्वारा दिए गये समाधान से संतुष्ट है कृपया शिकायतकर्ता की शिकायत को बंद कर दिया जाए

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 26-05-2021 थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक-जिगना,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 02-06-2021 महोदय प्रा0पत्र उपरोक्त की निस्तारण आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है। निस्तारित

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

6 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Mr. First Appellate Authority Right to Information Act 2005 is the special Act passed for specific purpose to provide information to citizens of this country dealing with the provisions available under Right to Information Act 2005. CPIO denial of sought information is arbitrary and ultra vires to the provisions of Right to Information Act.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is a fact that growing crime in the state of Uttar Pradesh is because of rampant corruption in the working of the police in the state thereafter same role is being played in the judiciary lower judiciary acting like bastion of corruption.
    If the police in the state will act like judge then how the justice will reach to the weaker and downtrodden section specially poor people in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. According to subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005, it shall be obligatory duty of every public authority to provide reasons for its decisions to parties concerned. It is unfortunate that decisions of CPIO denying sought information is corrupt, arbitrary and cryptic in nature and showing he is incompetent for the post of CP[O ipso facto. CPIO is acting against the spirit of RTI Act 2005.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The matter concerns with the and police is not providing justice to this lady so there is urgent need to pay attention to the grievances of this lady but there is rampant corruption in the department of police in the government of Uttar Pradesh and Yogi Adityanath is not captable to control the anarchy in the department of police in the government of Uttar Pradesh so if the prime minister office will overlook the applications submitted under right to information act 2005 then think about the deteriorating condition of the women and girls in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It has been practice in this largest democracy in the world that government functionaries are adopting lackadaisical approach in the matter concerned with the the weaker and oppressed section and especially women and girls.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You've written an excellent post, and you've shared it with us. Your article provided me with some unique and useful knowledge 306 ipc. I appreciate you sharing this text with us.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post