Smt Radha Rastogi sought information from directorate of prosecution against arbitrary treatment in working of APOs and PO

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2024/60213

Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Filing 12/03/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 12/03/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  


Telephone Number 9454405121


Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-



* Public Authority Director General of Police Office  

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2024/60213

Date of Filing 12/03/2024

* Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address W/O Vimal Kumar Rastogi , Garhaiya Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Districts Budaun

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9354762733

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Public information officer in the office of director general prosecution must provide the following information point wise to the information seeker as follows.

1- Public information officer must provide the latest guideline provided to the assistant prosecution officers regarding conduct of business concerning examination of witnesses of prosecution. 

2-PIO must provide the available guidelines of the government which provide reprieve to old age witnesses from cumbersome proceedings of court so that we may not be treated like accused. 

3-Please provide the maximum time taken by the A.P.O. to produce witnesses before the court for witness testimony when witnesses are always ready from the date of registration of case in the court. 

PIO may provide the three points information within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005 in the light of following details and attached documents to the RTI application. .   

To establish an effective and impartial prosecution in the State, Directorate of Prosecution was established in 1980.Function of the Directorate is to have administrative control and to monitor the work of Administrative Director Prosecution, Joint Director Prosecution, Senior Prosecution Officer, Assistant Prosecution Officer working in Directorate of Prosecution. It is part of the Home Department of Government of Uttar Pradesh. Director General Prosecution is the chief officer of Directorate of Prosecution. All powers of head of department are vested in the Director general.In The Court Of : CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BUDAUN

CNR Number. : UPBN040176992023

Case Number. : Warrant Or Summons Criminal Case/0011683/2023

State Of UP Versus DINESH GUPTA, Date :26-02-2024

Next Purpose-Hearing

Next Hearing Date-21-03-2024


Chief Judicial Magistrate

Case Details-Case Type-Warrant Or Summons Criminal Case

Filing Number- 17699/2023, Filing Date- 03-07-2023, Registration Number- 11683/2023, Registration Date- 03-07-2023, CNR Number- UPBN040176992023

Case Status-First Hearing Date-03-07-2023, Next Hearing Date-21-03-2024, Case Stage-Hearing, Court Number-20 And Judge- CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BUDAUN

The applicant which means information seeker, is a senior citizen who has to be examined in the matter as a prime witness. We attend the court proceedings whenever this case is fixed for the proceedings when we request the reader of the learned judge/magistrate to take the witness testimony of the applicant but each time some pretext is made on the part of them. Here one thing is noticeable that neither they are telling us the fixed time when they will examine us nor they are taking out witness testimony by taking recourse to some pretext.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.


Your view points inspire us

  1. There is complete mismanagement in the working of the public authority department of prosecution government of Uttar Pradesh and I don't think that concerned will provide the information to the information seeker because this management is integral part of the rule of anarchy in the government machinery.

  2. There is no transparency and accountability in the proceedings carried out in the courts in this largest democracy in the world. It is quite of us that aggrieved lady is seeking information concerning the mismanagement in the working of assistant prosecuting officers and prosecuting officers but I am confirm that they will not provide any information concerned with their working.

  3. It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the wide public interest but it is certain that concerned will not provide any information because they do not want transparency and accountability in the working of public authority because of the rampant corruption in the working of the public authority.

  4. तंत्र में पारदर्शिता और जवाब दे ही सुनिश्चित करने के लिए जन सूचना अधिकार 2005 उत्तम साधन है किंतु भ्रष्टाचार के कारण इसका असर कम होने लगा है सरकारों को संविधान के अनुसार चलना चाहिए सरकारी पदाधिकारी को मनमाना आचरण से दूर रहना चाहिए

Previous Post Next Post