Online Appeal has been submitted successfully & Email has been sent on Applicant Email Id. & Your diary number is:601981
Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Online appeal application submitted
1 message
Central Information Commission (CIC) <no-reply@nic.in> 13 January 2024 at 11:19
To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Cc: feedback-cic@gov.in
Dear Yogi M P Singh,
Your online appeal is diarised. Details are given below:
1 Diary Number-601981
2 Diary date 13-01-2024
Please logon to : www.cic.gov.in for any further details.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)
An appeal under subsection 3 of
section 19 of the right to information act 2005 against central public
information officer, department of income tax who did not provide the information
to the appellant on the flimsy ground while the matter concerns the deep-rooted
corruption in the working of the public authority department of income tax.
To
Chief Information Commissioner of
India
The Central Information Commission,
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka,
New Delhi - 110 067
Appellant –Yogi M. P. Singh,
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Riva Road,
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001, Mobile number-7379105911
Versus
1-Central Public Information Officer-Sonu
Agrawal, Income Tax Officer CRU, Office of DGIT investigation New Delhi.
Phone: 011-23221441
Delhi.ito.cru.inv@incometax.gov.in
2-First Appellate Authority- AASHWITA LAL
Phone: 23593293
Delhi.addldit.hq.inv@incometax.gov.in
Prayer-Instead of pursuing the path
of negative approach of not providing information, Central Public Information
Officer must provide the information-to-information seeker/appellant in the
matter concerning deep rooted corruption, lawlessness and anarchy lowering the
dignity of the Department of income tax due to lack of transparency and
accountability in the working.
Short submissions of the Appellant
are as follows.
1-
It
is submitted before the Honourable Sir that Section 24 of RTI Act 2005
"Act not to apply in certain organizations”.
(1) Nothing contained in this Act
shall apply to the intelligence and security organisations specified in the
Second Schedule, being organisations established by the Central Government or
any information furnished by such organisations to that Government:
Provided that the
information pertaining to the allegations of corruption and human rights
violations shall not be excluded under this sub-section:
Think about the gravity of situation
department of income tax is concealing its corruption by taking the recourse of
this provision of the right to information act and working against the spirit
of the right to information act 2005 which is a mockery of the law.
2-CPIO Should provide the reasons for
not mentioning the registration number of the RTI applications as a right to
reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system.
Reply of CPIO- Kindly refer to your
online RTI application-Registration Number DGIND/R/T/23/00074, Name Yogi M P
Singh, Received Date 07/11/2023
In this regard it is informed that
registration number is allotted only to online RTI applications. Offline RTI
applications are not allotted with any registration number. You had filed an
offline RTI application therefore registration number was not mentioned in
order under section 7 dated 20th October 2023 passed by CPIO.
Submission of the appellant- It must
be noted that the appellant submitted an online RTI application in the matter.
It may be concerning-public authority transferred the RTI application offline
but the original registration number of the RTI application had to be mentioned
in entire communications concerning my RTI application. For the convenience of
the first appellate authority the appellant has attached the specific
communication in which the original registration number of the online
application was not mentioned to confuse the appellant. Under this point the
central public information officer provided misleading information unrelated
with the sought information of the appellant. Earlier and current acts of the
public information officer are promoting corruption in the Department of income
tax. Registration number of the RTI application is the identity of the
application if it is not mentioned by the public authority which means it is
keeping the information seeker in dark.
3- It is submitted before the
honourable sir that the appellant sought Information under point 2,3 and 4
which was not entertained by the central public information officer.
Consequently, the central public information officer provided incomplete
misleading information so action must be taken against him under disciplinary
proceedings of the department.
The appellant is seeking information
concerning with the mismanagement and irregularities and rampant corruption in
the department of income tax and public information officer is not providing
information to conceal the corruption of the department so central public
information officer must be directed to provide the information to the
information seeker as the matter concerns with the deep-rooted corruption in
the Department of income tax.
This is a humble request of the
appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public
services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an
arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is the need of the
hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoers in order to win the confidence
of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous
democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray to you, Hon’ble Sir.
Yours sincerely
Date-13/01/2024 Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile
number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Riva Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
To see the copy of the second appeal submitted
on the portal of CIC, please click on the link