Anand Kumar Tiwari submitted appeal against misleading information of C.O. before superintendent of police Bhadohi in land grabbing

 


Registration Number SPSRN/R/2023/60082

Name Anand Kumar Tiwari

Date of Filing 10/12/2023

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 31/12/2023

Reply :- आख्या प्रेषित है ।

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rajesh Bharti

Telephone Number 9454401115

Email-ID aspbdi@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE SANT RAVIDAS NAGAR (BHADOHI) 

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SPSRN/R/2023/60082

Date of Filing 10/12/2023

* Name Anand Kumar Tiwari

Gender Male

* Address S/O Wakil Dhar Tiwari Village Kandui , Post Darunhan, Police station Chauri Bajar, Tehsi and block Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi

Districts Sant Ravidas Nagar

Pincode 221402

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Details not provided

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9029116778

Email-ID anandkumartiwaribhadohi[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Land grabbing is criminal matter is dealt under Cr.P.C. and I.P.C., land dispute in which title is decided through verdict of court is civil case. It is quite obvious that tin shade has been kept in the land which is the share of the applicant inherited from the grandfather of the applicant which does not belong to the offenders Tej Dhar Tiwari and others, but police is not acting against them by charging them under sections of the Indian Penal Code. In this matter police have two options, one of them is to provide the copy after order of the competent authority so that the applicant may challenge it to the proper court and the second option is to register the case against the offenders under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code. Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation). 

Public information officer in the office of Superintendent of police district Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi may provide the following information to the information seeker pointwise as follows. 

1-it is quite obvious from the report of the station house officer, police station-Chauri, district-Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi offenders Tej Dhar Tiwari and others did not put the tin shade in the land of the applicant in compliance of the order of the competent authority or court which means they put the tin shade forcibly on the land of the applicant quite obvious from the report of the police. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system so it is obligatory duty of the public information officer to provide the reason of not taking action in the matter of land grabbing against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code. 

2-Please provide the provision of the law which provide the remedy against land grabbing under section 151 107 and 116 of criminal procedure code which are preventive measures. 

3-Whether Chauri police had asked offender Tej Dhar Tiwari to remove the encroachment from the land of the information seeker if not, provide its reason. 

4-Police did not act against offenders even after they indulged in the offense of land grabbing which prove the ulterior design of the police. It is obvious that police is still securing the offenders which implies that polices cooperating the offenders. 

Please provide the information if any order passed by the competent senior rank officers to check the integrity of the concerned police personnel in the matter of land grabbing. 

Public information officer must provide the 4-point information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection one of Section 7 of the right to Information Act 2005.

* Concerned PIO Umeshwar prabhat singh aurai

Designation circile officer

Phone No 9454401603

Email Id coaurai1@gmail.com

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number: SPSRN/A/2024/60001
Name: Anand Kumar Tiwari
Date of Filing :02-01-2024
Request filed with: SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE SANT RAVIDAS NAGAR (BHADOHI)
 Contact Details  
Telephone Number :9454401115
Email-ID:aspbdi@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details: -
   
* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE SANT RAVIDAS NAGAR (BHADOHI)
   
Personal Details:-
* Name Anand Kumar Tiwari
Gender Male
* Address S/O Wakil Dhar Tiwari Village Kandui , Post Darunhan, Police station Chauri Bajar, Tehsi and block Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi
Districts Sant Ravidas Nagar
Pincode 221402
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-9029116778
Email-ID anandkumartiwaribhadohi[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number SPSRN/A/2024/60001
Date of Filing 02/01/2024
Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer
Phone No Details not provided.
Email Id Details not provided.
* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete, Misleading or False Information
((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought
Most respected first appellate authority Superintendent of police district Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi, the appellant submits his representation pointwise as follows.
1-it is quite obvious from the report of the station house officer, police station-Chauri, district-Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi offenders Tej Dhar Tiwari and others did not put the tin shade in the land of the applicant in compliance of the order of the competent authority or court which means they put the tin shade forcibly on the land of the applicant quite obvious from the report of the police. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system so it is obligatory duty of the public information officer to provide the reason of not taking action in the matter of land grabbing against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code.
Submission- Police failed to take action in the matter of land grabbing so assistant public information officer provided misleading information deliberately addressing the matter as the land dispute. The station house officer has already told appellant that no magistrate order has been passed in the matter in favour of land grabbers. Land grabbers have only support of police who are justifying through its cryptic sentences which is a mockery of the law.
2-Please provide the provision of the law which provides the remedy against land grabbing under section 151 107 and 116 of criminal procedure code which are preventive measures.
Submission-   Tin shade is in the land of appellant which means land of the appellant has been grabbed and now police is saying that do not ask offenders to remove the tinshade because it will breach the peace thereafter I will take action which means police are supporting the grabbers.
3-Whether Chauri police had asked offender Tej Dhar Tiwari to remove the encroachment from the land of the information seeker, if not, provide its reason.
Submission-   Tin Shade is not kept by order of court but the outcome of failure of police so police may request offenders or implicate them under aforementioned sections of IPC. 
4-Police did not act against offenders even after they indulged in the offense of land grabbing which proves the ulterior design of the police. It is obvious that police are still securing the offenders which implies that police are cooperating with the offenders.
Please provide the information if any order passed by the competent senior rank officers to check the integrity of the concerned police personnel in the matter of land grabbing. 
Submission-Police did not act against offenders in the matter of land grabbing and overlooked repeated requests of the appellant. Police must ask offenders to seek direction of court to justify its grabbing otherwise they must remove encroachment from the land of appellant. Where is justice in the working of the police and a local panchayat works better. 
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number SPSRN/R/2023/60082
Date of Filing 10/12/2023
PIO of Public Authority approached Umeshwar prabhat singh aurai
Designation circile officer
Phone No 9454401603
Email Id coaurai1@gmail.com
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
Registration Number SPSRN/A/2024/60001
Name Anand Kumar Tiwari
Date of Filing 02/01/2024
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 02/01/2024
  Nodal Officer Details  
Name Rajesh Bharti
Telephone Number 9454401115
Email-ID aspbdi@gmail.com
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post