Preeti was provided electricity connection and Sunita was denied is the violation of the article 14 of the constitution of India


Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081128

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Mahesh Pratap Singh alias Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

An application under Article 51 A of constitution of India to make inquiry in electricity connections.

Executive engineer submitted the same parrot report in the following grievance without taking perusal of the contents of the grievance reflecting mockery of law.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0075752

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Mahesh Pratap Singh alias Yogi M. P. Singh, Date of Receipt-14/11/2023

Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Most respected sir, it is an obligatory duty of a public authority to redress the grievance of an aggrieved complainant according to the prayer and contents of grievances submitted by the complainant.

Executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr Rajesh Kumar District Mirzapur must meditate on it.

Mrs. Prabhavati Devi wife of Mr. Ram Avtar Has two sons and two daughter-in-laws whose description is as follows.

1-Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad and 2-Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad

In the same premises you have provided the electricity connection to the Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad who is the sister-in-law of the aggrieved applicant Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad. Why is the following reason not applicable to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad? Right to reason is the indispensable part of a sound administrative system so this reason must be provided to the applicant as required under the law. Under subsection 1 d of the section 4 of the right to information act 2005 it has been categorically stated that it shall be obligatory duty of each public authority to provide the reasons of its decision to the parties concerned. Do not conceal corruption.

Right to reason is an indispensable part of sound administrative system so it is an obligatory duty of the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd to provide the reason of not providing electricity connection to Sunitha wife of Mr Mangala Prasad on the similar ground which was used in case of sister in law preeti wife of Ashok Prasad.

The matter of concern is different here since the Department of electricity, district-Mirzapur who provided electricity connection to the sister-in-law of the applicant Sunita so on the same ground Sunita must also be provided electricity connection if her sister in-law is poor, she is also poor. Here this question arises that why in the same premises electricity connection was provided to sister-in-law Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad if providing electricity connection was illegal in the premises of mother-in-law because of arrears as reported by the concerned staff quite obvious from the attached PDF document to the grievance. I think that an illegal work is performed by the public staff only when he is provided illegal gratification otherwise there is no other way of thinking. It reflects rampant corruption in the working of the public authority department of electricity because they are not providing electricity to the aggrieved consumer. If the government of Uttar Pradesh is honest in its working, then they must order an inquiry into the matter of providing connection in which there is rampant corruption in the department.

Whether the partial treatment with the vulnerable lady is not the violation of the human rights of the Lady? Article 14 treats all people the same in the eyes of the law. This provision states that all citizens will be treated equally before the law. The law of the country protects everybody equally. Under the same circumstances, the law will treat people in the same manner. This implies that everyone is alike before the law and everyone has equal protection of the law. This article prohibits discrimination in any manner. Whether the act of the personnel of the department is not the violation of the Article 14 of the constitution of India in respect to the vulnerable lady. It is quite obvious that provisions of the constitution have been put into the heap of garbage by the staff of the Uttar Pradesh power corporation limited Mirzapur.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action


Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

Contact Number


To see the attached pdf document to the grievance, please click on the link


An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post