SHRC has registered a case no. 1658/24/4/2023 on the complaint regarding Saurabh Singh made against S.H.O. Mauaima, Prayagraj


SHRC, Uttar Pradesh

Case Details

Diary No 1836/IN/2023 Case / File No 1658/24/4/2023

Victim Name SAURABH SINGH Registration Date 17/05/2023

Action List (Click on Action given in blue color to view details)

No action taken yet

Expand All Action List


Diary No 1836/IN/2023 Section CHPR


Received Date 16/05/2023 Complaint Date 16/05/2023


Victim Name SAURABH SINGH Gender Male

Religion Hindu Cast General






District MIRZAPUR State UTTAR PRADESH ( 231001 )


Incident Place POLICE STATION MAUAIMA Incident Date 01/03/2023

Incident Category ABUSE OF POWER

Incident District PRAYAGRAJ (ALLAHABAD) Incident State UTTAR PRADESH


Case Details-Diary No 1188/IN/2023 Case / File No 1085/24/4/2023

Victim Name SAURABH SINGH ALIAS RAJAN SINGH Registration Date 03/04/2023


                                 Honourable chairperson / companion members                      

                              State Human Rights Commission of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow

Subject-Saurabh Singh was mercilessly beaten by offenders and S.H.O. MauAima instead of registering F.I.R. of the victim put him in a lockup and registered false cases against not only the victim but his father as well by misusing his post and power. The injuries are reflecting at the bodily organs of the victim and quite obvious from the medical examination reports of the victim carried out by the MauAima police itself at the Phoolpur primary health care centre by the government doctor attached to the petition. 

With due respect, the applicant invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1- I pray before the Honourable Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that in general, no F.I.R. is registered by the police on the straight complaint of the victims. It is quite obvious that the police registered a case under section 151,107 and 116 of the criminal penal code on the direction of assistant commissioner of police, circle Phoolpur, Prayagraj on 01 March 2023.

On the same day, in the night at two minutes past 9 o clock, police registered six serious cases in the same matter under six serious sections of the Indian penal code not only against the victim Saurabh Singh who was in the lock up of the MauAima police but his father-Tej Bahadur Singh as well.

The copy of the F.I.R. is attached to the petition and the case filed against the victims under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code. 

1-Under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

2-Under section 504 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

3-Under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

4-Under section 427 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

5-Under section 354 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

6-Under section 380 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

 3- I pray before the Honourable Sir that Saurabh Singh was mercilessly beaten who had gone to lodge FIR along with his father at Mauaima police station but instead of registering F.I.R., S.H.O. Mauaima put him in lockup but concerned thought that Saurabh still pressed them to lodge F.I.R. against offenders on contrary S.H.O. Mauaima registered F.I.R. against the victim and his father to teach them is the blatant misuse of power by the police in order to teach a lesson to common people.

4-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that If police is really honest to duty, an impartial enquiry may be ordered to ensure the accountability of concerned police personnel and register a case under appropriate section of Indian penal code against offenders so that injustice done to the victim may be sorted out. Sir, this is a travesty of justice and reflection of anarchy in the working of the police. Please curb this anarchy through an impartial enquiry in the wide public interest.

5-I pray before the Honourable Sir that here S.H.O. Mauaima not only played with power tools provided him for the safeguard and protections of the rights of the citizens in a negligent manner but violated the human rights of the victims by fabricating them under false charges to deviate the attention from the core issue.  

6-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that S.H.O. says no article found in the possession of Surabh Singh S/O Tej Bahadur Singh yet he fabricated not only Saurabh Singh but his father as well under six sections of I.P.C. at the behest of the opposite party at two minutes past 9 O'clock in the night of 01 March 2023 including charges of theft. No F.I.R. is registered without permission of S.H.O. under advice of the Circle Officer if the offence is serious.Father and Son had gone to lodge F.I.R. against the opposite party but who is apprised of cryptic dealings of police that son will be detained by the police under section 151, 107 and 116 of Cr. P.C. and in the night of the same day both father and son will be fabricated under false charges of I.P.C. as aforementioned. 

                           Please connect this supplementary to Case Details-Diary No 1188/IN/2023 Case / File No 1085/24/4/2023

Victim Name SAURABH SINGH ALIAS RAJAN SINGH Registration Date 03/04/2023 for appropriate action in the matter.

To see the registered document to the grievance, click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post