Both parties purchased land from same landlord, mutations have been carried out, one of parties grabbed entire land yet good governance


Successful Registration

Your communication has been registered successfully with the following registration number:


Note: Kindly Note Your Registration Number for further references.

An email / sms has been sent to the email address / mobile number provided by you.

Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2023/0008499

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Anil Kumar Maurya

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

An application under article 51A of the constitution of India on behalf of my father Gulabdhar Maurya Son of late Amarnath Maurya resident of village and post Lohiya Talab district Mirzapur to make enquiry regarding the compliance of the endorsement order passed by the Honourable sub divisional magistrate Sadar Mirzapur 28 September 2021. This order was addressed to the station house officer Kotwali Katra district Mirzapur quite obvious from the second page of the attached documents.

In reference to these grievances and submitted reports of Lekhpal concerned registration number: PMOPG/E/2023/0005044, registration number: PMOPG/E/2023/0005044. 

From the report of the Lekhpal concerned, it is quite obvious that the opposite party has grabbed the entire land and is not interested to leave the grabbed land. Here the applicant is not the co-shareholder of the land but paid the price of the land and title has been decided by the concerned magistrate during the process mutation. Therefore, the applicant is the undisputed landlord and boundary of the land has been decided by the Tehsil and police, but possession could not be provided because opposite party members are notorious criminals as mentioned by the applicant in his earlier applications. Both police and Tehsil are frightened of them. The boundary of the land after mutation has been decided and Lekhpal itself accepted it his report that opposite has grabbed the entire land while in accordance with the law, they must claim for the piece of land purchased by them not the entire land consequently opposite party is reaping the benefit of muscle power and peace-loving nature of the applicant in the matter. 

Section 116 of revenue code 2006 states as follows. Section 116 UP Revenue Code Description(1) A bhumidhar may sue for the division of the holding of which he is a co-sharer.(2) In every such suit, the Court may also divide the trees, wells and other improvements existing on such holding but where such division is not possible, the trees, wells and other improvements aforesaid and valuation thereof shall be divided and adjusted in the manner prescribed.(3) One suit may be instituted for the division of more holdings than one where all the parties to the suit other than the Gram Panchayat are jointly interested in each of the holdings.(4) To every suit under this section, the Gram Panchayat concerned shall be made a party.

Here whatever land is purchased by the opposite party, they must confine themselves to the same land but because of their criminal nature they are trying to take the law of land under their teeth by grabbing the land of the applicant of which title is in the name of the applicant quite obvious from the report of the Lekhpal.  

लेखपाल की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक शिकायतकर्ता और विपक्ष दोनों ने जमीन खरीदी, लेकिन विपक्ष पूरी जमीन हड़प रहा है। पुलिस और तहसील दोनों ने कब्जा करने वालों से अनुरोध किया लेकिन उन्होंने अनुरोध को अस्वीकार कर दिया। निस्संदेह यह रिपोर्ट तहसील की हताशा है और वे मामले से बच रहे हैं। लेखपाल जमीन हड़पने के मामले में शिकायतकर्ता को राजस्व संहिता 2006 की धारा 116 के तहत मुकदमा दायर करने का बेतुका सुझाव दे रहा है।

यह बेतुका सुझाव तब आया जब राजस्व संहिता 2006 की धारा 24 के तहत भूमि की सीमा तय की  जा चुकी है। The applicant made the application under section 24 of the revenue code 2006 to decide the boundary of the land on the suggestion of the staff of the department of revenue tehsil Sadar and pai mise of the land was made by the concerned lekhpal but still no action taken by the department of revenue and police concerned to provide the possession of the land to the applicant so that fear of the land mafia may end.

The most important fact is that the Lekhpal Rahul Jadaun, whose mobile number is 72370 18737, is himself a firm measurer and that firm measure has not yet been submitted by him to the Divisional Magistrate, due to which, according to him, there is delay because the Lekhpal They are very friendly and polite in conversation, but the matte

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance Received   

Date of Action


Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Prime Ministers Office

Officer Name

Mukul Dixit, Under Secretary (Public)

Organisation name

Prime Ministers Office

Contact Address

Public Wing 5th Floor, Rail Bhawan New Delhi

Email Address

Contact Number


To see the attached document to the grievance, click on link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post