Three cases filed in revenue court by Kamlesh Singh, and adjudication is pending but opposite party is grabbing impugned land

 


Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2022/0326499

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Kamlesh Singh

Date of Receipt

10/12/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

श्री मान जी उपजिलाधिकारी सदर का आख्या जो उन्होंने इस शिकायत में लगाया है प्रार्थी रघुवर दयाल सिंह जमीन का बैनामा करने से रोकने के लिए आवेदन दिया है ऐसा तो इसमें कही नहीं लिखा है दूसरी वात प्रार्थी द्वारा आपत्ति किया गया है जो मुकदमा विचाराधीन है इसी वजह से अभी तक नामांतरण नहीं हुआ है अब विपक्षी लाठी के बल पर कब्ज़ा कर रहे है जो खुद न्यायालय पर एक बदनुमा दाग जिसका रोका जाना अनिवार्य है हैंड पंप लग चुका है जब कब्ज़ा ही हो जाएगा तो मुकदमे का क्या मतलब है पुलिस और तहसील के भ्र्ष्टाचार के कारण यह संभव हो रहा है महोदय जब न्यायालय मुकदमा विचाराधीन है तो जमीन में बोर करवाकर कब्ज़ा करना कहा तक न्यायोचित है क्या जिगना पुलिस का यह नैतिक दायित्व नहीं है की अभियुक्त गणो को बिबादित जमीन जमीन किसी तरह कोई कब्जे कार्यवाही न करने दे नहीं तो उपजिलाधिकारी महोदय के पास निर्णय सुनाने के लिए कुछ बचेगा ही नहीं इस तरह से न्यायालय का भी कोई महत्व नहीं रहेगा श्री मान जी प्रार्थी को इस आराजकता की मार से बचाइए श्री मान जी ऐसे में न्यायालय का क्या महत्व है न्यायालय के निर्णय का कोई इन्तजार नहीं करना चाहता है जो अपराधी किस्म के लोग है


Now offenders have installed the handpump in the impugned land whose matter is sub judice before a competent revenue court. Police is mute spectators because of corruption.


Subject-Despite the objection by the applicant in sub judice matter pending before the competent revenue court under section 34/35 of the revenue code 2006 quite obvious from the Nakal made available by the court and attached to this grievance, offenders are taking possession of the land by using muscle power.


Herewith the details of the victim are as follows. Name- Kamlesh Singh, Gender -Male, Address-Village Kothra Kantit, Post Shree Nivas Dham, Police station Jigna, Pin code- 231313, Country-India, State- Uttar Pradesh,


Details of the offenders are as follows.


1-Raghuvar Dayal Singh S/O Bhanu Pratap Singh 2-Jaydheer Singh S/O Raghuvar Dayal Singh 3-Dilip Singh S/O Raghuvar Dayal Singh 4-Nagendra Singh S/O Jaydheer Singh 5-Amit Singh S/O Jaidheer Singh 6-Himanshu Singh S/O Jaidheer Singh


The address of the aforementioned offenders is as follows.


Village-Kothra Kantit, Post Shree Nivas Dham, Police station-Jigna, Pin code 231313, Country-India, State-Uttar Pradesh.


Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2022/0300436


Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Kamlesh Singh Date of Receipt 10/11/2022


There is huge inconsistency in the report submitted by Tehsil Sadar and prayer made in the complaint. Already objections have been made in the concerned court but here this question arises that if the matter is sub judice and adjudication is pending in the concerned revenue court how the opposite party can take the possession of the impugned land by using muscle power in the matter. It is fact that the report of the concerned staff of the Tehsil Sadar is bogus and illogical. It implies that the Tehsil Sadar Mirzapur is filled with the incompetent personnel who cannot understand the matter of the complaints submitted by the citizens in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

I pray before the Honourable Sir that to shut its eyes and close its ears do not imply that everything is OKAY as factual position cannot be overlooked. Only time will tell the reality.


If the Jigna police are really interested to resolve the problems created by offenders, then they should adopt the logistic approach to the matter. Here it is quite obvious that offenders are not waiting for the judgement of the competent court in the sub judice matter as quite obvious lis pendens. But one thing is quite evident Jigna police will wreak vengeance on the applicant for submitting representations before the competent authorities for justice against the illegal grabbing of land by offenders whose litigation is pending before the revenue court. The applicant has attached the current photographs to the grievance which is status quo after calling two times dial 112 police on the site on the part of the applicant.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

23/12/2022

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित आख्या अपलोड कर सेवा में सादर अग्रसारित है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

श्रीमान जी मुकदमा तो पहले से ही तहसीलदार न्यायालय में लंबित है अब प्रार्थी द्वारा कितने मुकदमे किए जाएंगे तीन मुकदमे तो पहले से ही तहसील न्यायालय में लंबित हैं। श्रीमान जी यदि रिश्वतखोरी बंद हो जाए तो देश के 75% मुकदमे अपने आप स्वतह ही समाप्त हो जाएंगे। श्रीमान जी यह रिपोर्ट जो कि तहसीलदार सदर द्वारा लगाया गया है उन्हीं के न्यायालय में तीनों मुकदमे लंबित हैं। उन्हें खुद ही इसके चिंता नहीं है कि यदि उनके यहां विवादित जमीन Sir, the case is already pending in Tehsildar court, now how many cases will be filed by the applicant, three cases are already pending in Tehsil court. Sir, if bribery is stopped, then 75% of the cases in the country will end automatically. Sir, this report which has been submitted by Tehsildar Sadar, all the three cases are pending in his court. They themselves are not worried about the fact that if the disputed land will be decided by the bullies themselves on the strength of bullying, then there is no importance of pending case and waiting for the decision.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post