Dayanand Singh cannot ask Tehsildar Sadar to sign on the recommendation letter sent to executive engineer EDD II but it can be returned by Later

 




संदर्भ संख्या : 40019922028279 , दिनांक - 20 Dec 2022 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40019922028279

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Think about the gravity of the situation that according to page 2 and 3 of attached PDF documents, which are arbitrary reports of Executive Engineer EDD II, A.K. Singh in which he is pressuring aggrieved Dayanand Singh to ask Tehsildar Sadar to resubmit recommendation by rectifying its report which is illegal because aggrieved has no such power to ask Tehsildar Sadar. From the first page it is obvious that Lekhpal submitted its report on 15062021 and it was forwarded by revenue inspector on 1906.2021 for sanction and then the entire report sent by Tehsil Sadar to Executive Engineer EDD II, A.K. Singh. According to the rule of land, if the report of Tehsil Sadar is not conforming to the setup norms then it must be returned to them for rectification.  शिकायत संख्या -40019922027912 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण शिकायत संख्या -40019922027555 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय- Sir, Executive Engineer Power Distribution Division II AK Singh is complicating the case by giving a roundabout answer. The applicant only says that the Tehsildar Sadar has presented his report but the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II has found loopholes in it and is yet to compensate the victim. They are running away from providing the compensation to the victim, which is illegal, unjust, unconstitutional as far as the removal of objections are concerned, the objections which have been said to be removed in that report can be removed only by the person who has presented that report. The working style of the engineer is full of corruption and unconstitutional. Whatever he is saying is not according to the rules, He is saying for the new report but the report has already been prepared, only its shortcomings have to be removed and Dayanand Singh son of Shobh Nath Singh will not remove those shortcomings, Tehsildar Sadar and sab divisional Magistrate Sadar may remove the errors. Sir, if Tehsil Sadar has presented his report then only Tehsil Sadar will remove the shortcomings in it, but this simple thing is beyond the understanding of AK Singh, engineer of power distribution division second. A. K. Singh is not able to understand the simple fact that the report belongs to tahsil Sadar so IT will be rectified by the tehsil Sadar. Truth is that he does not have the courage to talk properly because the wrong person always runs away from the right thing., Think that the crop worth of Rs 50000 was burnt to ashes. Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, due to whose lacunae crop has been burnt, is running away from giving compensation by creating baseless facts, is this called good governance, where rights of the people are only violated, which human rights are protected here? Nothing is visible except corruption. Today, the report which is in a hurry apparently shown by executive Engineer distribution division second, was pending in his office for more than 1 and half years. When the request was made by the applicant, Dayanand Singh then this deficiency was deliberately created by them. It is true that these people are running away from paying compensation, otherwise the assessment of damages has been done by Tehsil Sadar quite obvious from the attached document to the grievance. श्रीमान जी अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय एके सिंह प्रकरण को गोल मटोल जवाब देकर जटिल बना रहे हैं प्रार्थी का सिर्फ यह कहना है कि तहसीलदार सदर अपनी आख्या प्रस्तुत कर चुके हैं किंतु अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय उसमें कमियां निकाल कर पीड़ित को

Department -विद्युतComplaint Category -

नियोजित तारीख-27-12-2022शिकायत की स्थिति-

Level -जनपद स्तरPost -अधिशासी अभियन्‍ता,विघुत

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अग्रसारित विवरण :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी अग्रसारित/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 20-12-2022 27-12-2022 अधिशासी अभियन्‍ता,विघुत-मिर्ज़ापुर,विद्युत अनमार्क

  Successful Registration

Your communication has been registered successfully with the following registration number:

PMOPG/E/2022/0336219

Note: Kindly Note Your Registration Number for further references.

An email / sms has been sent to the email address / mobile number provided by you.

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2022/0336219

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Daya Nand Singh

Date of Receipt

20/12/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

Think about the gravity of the situation that according to page 2 and 3 of attached PDF documents, which are arbitrary reports of Executive Engineer EDD II, A.K. Singh in which he is pressuring aggrieved Dayanand Singh to ask Tehsildar Sadar to resubmit recommendation by rectifying its submitted recommendation which is illegal because aggrieved has no such power to ask Tehsildar Sadar. From the first page it is obvious that Lekhpal submitted its report on 15/06/2021 and it was forwarded by revenue inspector on 19/06.2021 for sanction and then the entire report sent by Tehsil Sadar to Executive Engineer EDD II, A.K. Singh. According to the rule of land, if the report of Tehsil Sadar is not conforming to the setup norms then it must be returned to them for rectification.

शिकायत संख्या:-40019922027912 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण शिकायत संख्या -40019922027555 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय- Sir, Executive Engineer Power Distribution Division II AK Singh is complicating the case by giving a roundabout answer. The applicant only says that the Tehsildar Sadar has presented his report, but the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II has found loopholes in it and is yet to compensate the victim. They are running away from providing the compensation to the victim, which is illegal, unjust, unconstitutional as far as the removal of objections are concerned, the objections which have been said to be removed in that report can be removed only by the person who has presented that report. The working style of the engineer is full of corruption and unconstitutional. Whatever he is saying is not according to the rules, He is saying for the new report but the report has already been prepared, only its shortcomings have to be removed and Dayanand Singh son of Shobh Nath Singh will not remove those shortcomings, Tehsildar Sadar and sab divisional Magistrate Sadar may remove the errors. Sir, if Tehsil Sadar has presented his report then only Tehsil Sadar will remove the shortcomings in it, but this simple thing is beyond the understanding of AK Singh, engineer of power distribution division second. A. K. Singh is not able to understand the simple fact that the report belongs to tahsil Sadar so IT will be rectified by the tehsil Sadar. Truth is that he does not have the courage to talk properly because the wrong person always runs away from the right thing., Think that the crop worth of Rs 50000 was burnt to ashes. Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, due to whose lacunae crop has been burnt, is running away from giving compensation by creating baseless facts, is this called good governance, where rights of the people are only violated, which human rights are protected here? Nothing is visible except corruption. Today, the report which is in a hurry apparently shown by executive Engineer distribution division second, was pending in his office for more than 1 and half years. When the request was made by the applicant, Dayanand Singh then this deficiency was deliberately created by them. It is true that these people are running away from paying compensation, otherwise the assessment of damages has been done by Tehsil Sadar quite obvious from the attached document to the grievance. श्रीमान जी अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय एके सिंह प्रकरण को गोल मटोल जवाब देकर जटिल बना रहे हैं प्रार्थी का सिर्फ यह कहना है कि तहसीलदार सदर अपनी आख्या प्रस्तुत कर चुके हैं किंतु अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय उसमें कमियां निकाल कर पीड़ित को क्षतिपूर्ति देने से भाग रहे हैं जो कि अवैध है अन्याय पूर्ण है असंवैधानिक है और प्रश्न गत प्रकरण में उस रिपोर्ट में जिन कमियों को दूर करने की बात कही गई है वह वही व्यक्ति दूर कर सकता है जिसने उस रिपोर्ट उस आख्या को प्रस्तुत किया है यहां पर अधिशासी अभियंता की कार्यशैली भ्रष्टाचार पूर्ण है और असंवैधानिक है जो कुछ भी वह कह रहे हैं वह नियमानुसार नहीं है रही जहां बात वह कह रहे हैं कि रिपोर्ट तैयार कराने की तो रिपोर्ट तो पहले से ही तैयार है सिर्फ उसकी कमियों को दूर करना है और कमियां दूर करने का काम दयानंद सिंह पुत्र सोभनाथ सिंह नहीं करेंगे उन कमियों को दूर करेंगे तहसीलदार सदर और उप जिलाधिकारी सदर ना की दयानंद सिंह श्रीमान जी यदि तहसील सदर अपनी आंख्या प्रस्तुत किया है तो उसमें जो कमियां हैं उसको तहसील सदर ही तो दूर करेगा किंतु  सच तो यह है  यह साधारण सी बात विद्युत वितरण खंड के अभियंता एके सिंह को समझ में नहीं आ रही है 

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance Received   

Date of Action

20/12/2022

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Prime Ministers Office

Officer Name

Mukul Dixit ,Under Secretary (Public)

Organisation name

Prime Ministers Office

Contact Address

Public Wing 5th Floor, Rail Bhawan New Delhi

Email Address

us-public.sb@gov.in

Contact Number

011-23386447