If the High court ordered to decide the title suit, why Lucknow development authority executed the registry without deciding the title suit?





Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

If the High court ordered to decide the title suit, why Lucknow development authority executed the registry without deciding the title suit?
1 message

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>24 October 2022 at 02:53
To: president secretariat <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, Governor Uttar Pradesh <hgovup@gov.in>, Chief Minister <'cmup@nic.in>, Supreme Court India <'supremecourt@nic.in>, PMO India <indiaportal@gov.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, ldartionline@gmail.com
It is a bitter truth that our system has been insensitive because of rampant corruption. 
An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh under Article 51 A of the constitution of India.
Lucknow development authority,  lower court Lucknow and Lucknow police took under teeth the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad. 
I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated  07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad It is simply ordered that respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Respondent 1. Dept. of home 2-Police commissioner Lucknow 3-SHO police station -Ashiana, 

Moreover, Honourable Justice in its order said that the raised matter is civil and amenable by filing a title suit before the court or authority. 

It is most surprising that the subordinate court is running away from taking perusal of the order dated  07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and office monitoring body running away from transparency and accountability ipso facto.
Whether Lucknow development authority will disclose this fact that which court of law provided the civil remedy in the matter and decided the title suit between Anuradha Singh and Dinesh Pratap Singh if not done so on what basis registry was carried out without taking the reference of the high court order which was mandatory for the Lucknow development authority to comply with the order passed by the highest court of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh.
Lucknow Development Authority again overlooked the matter of deep-rooted corruption quite obvious from its report submitted on the PG Portal.
Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2022/76147
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 19/09/2022
Think about the deep-rooted corruption in the working of the Lucknow development authority which is procrastinating in providing information concerning the setup of the enquiry committee which is making inquiries regarding irregularity in the allocation of the plots by the Lucknow development authority and the corruption made during the registry of the plots.
It is well-known fact that this matter is pending before the Lucknow development authority since 2017 and they are procrastinating on this matter of corruption by taking recourse to various cunning tricks. Instead of going into the facts of the case, they have made a committee now to procrastinate on it. Here the matter of fact is that why the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad was not complied with by the Lucknow development authority? Why was the registry executed by the Lucknow development authority without taking perusal of the relevant records? Here honesty and sincerity are only on to serve the print and electronic media not in the working of the government departments. Whether it is good governance as articulated by our great prime minister Mr Narendra Damodar Modi and our chief minister Yogi Adityanath on various occasions? Yogi Adityanath sir it is not reflecting deep-rooted corruption in the working of Lucknow development authority.
Our motive is good governance.


श्री मान जी इस समय लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण चाहे जनसूचना के तहत आवेदन हो या शिकायत हो या कोई निवेदन हो हर किसी को इस आधार पर नजरअंदाज कर रही है की मामले में समिति गठित कर दी गयी है किन्तु न तो समिति के सन्दर्भ में कुछ बताएँगे और न ही प्रश्न गत प्रकरण को हल करने का ही प्रयास करेंगे तीन वर्षो से मामले में ताल मटोल कर रहे है क्या इसी तरह से योगी सरकार भ्र्ष्टाचार रोकती है 

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making a mockery of the law of the land? There is a need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of the citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date 24/10/2022           Yours sincerely

                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram Colony, Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Riva Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001. 


 https://www.yogi.systems/2022/04/district-judge-lucknow-ordered-on-16.html?m=1

Queries made.pdf
955K
 
Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post