Appeal submitted against CPIO High court at Allahabad delivered in his office on 16 Aug 2022 quite obvious from speed post tracking

 

Booked At Booked On Destination Pincode Tariff Article Type Delivery Location Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter 08/08/2022 18:24:07 211017 41.30 Inland Speed Post Prayagraj High Court S.O 16/08/2022 13:11:45
Event Details For : EU058637175IN
Current Status : Item Delivery Confirmed
Date Time Office Event
16/08/2022 13:11:45 Prayagraj High Court S.O Item Delivery Confirmed
11/08/2022 12:27:48 Prayagraj High Court S.O Out for Delivery
11/08/2022 11:22:09 Prayagraj High Court S.O Item Received
10/08/2022 02:10:11 Mail Agency Prayagraj RMS Item Dispatched
09/08/2022 18:11:29 Mail Agency Prayagraj RMS Item Received
09/08/2022 15:37:35 Prayagraj NSH Item Dispatched
09/08/2022 15:04:10 Prayagraj NSH Item Bagged
09/08/2022 12:47:53 Prayagraj NSH Item Received
09/08/2022 12:09:39 Mail Agency Prayagraj RMS Item Dispatched
09/08/2022 12:05:36 Mail Agency Prayagraj RMS Item Received
09/08/2022 08:32:46 MA Mirzapur TMO Item Dispatched
09/08/2022 08:31:30 MA Mirzapur TMO Item Received
09/08/2022 08:26:36 Mirzapur ICH Item Dispatched
09/08/2022 06:54:50 Mirzapur ICH Item Bagged
09/08/2022 02:11:40 Mirzapur ICH Item Received
08/08/2022 20:40:21 Mirzapur RMS POS Counter Item Dispatched
08/08/2022 20:39:12 Mirzapur RMS POS Counter Item Bagged
08/08/2022 18:24:07 Mirzapur RMS POS Counter Item Booked

Pasted from <https://www.indiapost.gov.in/_layouts/15/DOP.Portal.Tracking/TrackConsignment.aspx> 


An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 against procrastination and non providing sought information by CPIO (Allahabad High Court) Registrar (Accounts) and CAPIO (Allahabad High Court)to the information seeker within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005. 

To 

                                                    First Appellate Authority /Registrar General 

                                                        High court of Judicature at Allahabad

                                                  Allahabad High Court Nyay Marg, Allahabad,

                                                                Uttar Pradesh-211017

Prayer-Instead of pursuing the path of dilly dally approach, CPIO (Allahabad High Court) Registrar (Accounts) must provide the information to information seeker/appellant in the matter concerning deep rooted corruption, lawlessness and anarchy lowering the dignity of the courts due to lack of transparency and accountability in the working. 

Honourable  First Appellate Authority /Registrar General, 

                                                                                              The appellant invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following submissions as follows. 

1-I pray before the Honourable Sir that  Honourable Joint Registrar I/c Central Public Information Officer High Court of Judicature At Allahabad PIN Code-211017
quoted in the communication Letter number-737/RTI/351/2022/AHC Dated 25 June 2022 addressed to information seeker, subject matter of the grievance DEPOJ/E/2019/04435 has not been specified in the RTI Application dated 19/04/2022 by the information seeker and no copy of the grievance DEPOJ/E/2019/04435 attached to RTI Application dated 19/04/2022.

Honourable Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1 for details. 

2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that your appellant responded to the aforementioned communication dated  25 June 2022 of Joint Registrar I/c Central Public Information Officer High Court of Judicature At Allahabad on 30 June 2022. 

Honourable Sir may be pleased to take a glance at annexure 2 and 3 for details. 

3-I pray before the Honourable Sir that the communication sent by the appellant on 30 June 2022 received in the High court of Judicature on 04/07/2022 at time 16:56:03 by Fack section h c (Addressee) ] as follows

Event Details For : EU276907215INCurrent Status : Item Delivered [To: Fack section h c (Addressee) ]

Date  Time Office            Event

 

04/07/2022         16:56:03     Allahabad High Court SO (Beat Number:4)      Item Delivered [To: Fack section h c (Addressee) ]

For more details, vide annexure 4 to this appeal. 

4-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that your appellant submitted R.T.I. request under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 on 19 April 2022 which is enclosed to this appeal. 

Honourable Sir may be pleased to take a glance at annexure 5 and 6 for details.

5-I pray before the Honourable Sir that as usual practice in the High court of judicature, documents are usually disappeared, consequently appellant again annexed a copy of the grievance DEPOJ/E/2019/04435 in two pages. 

Honourable Sir may be pleased to take a glance at annexure 7 and 8 for details.

6-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that stipulated time to provide information to the information seeker is 30 as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005 which implies that CPIO/ACPIO violated subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005. 

       The matter concerns wide public interests consequently requires utmost attention. Please help your appellant by providing sought information and ensure transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority. 

                 Your appellant humbly requests you, Honourable Sir, to safeguard supremacy of law by taking appropriate action in the matter in accordance with the law.  For this, your appellant shall ever pray to you Honourable Sir. 

Date-08/08/2022                                            With regard 

                                      Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,

Mohalla- Surekapuram, Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001

 

Note-Original application cum appeal in four pages and annexures in eight pages. Entire pages are signed.

Affidavit-I swear in the name of God that entire entries made by the appellant in this appeal is based on the facts and documentary evidences and true to best of my knowledge if anything found wrong then action must be taken against appellant.

                                                        Your pledger

                                                   Yogi M. P. Singh

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

4 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. I swear in the name of God that entire entries made by the appellant in this appeal is based on the facts and documentary evidences and true to best of my knowledge if anything found wrong then action must be taken against appellant.

    Your pledger

    Yogi M. P. Singh

    ReplyDelete
  2. सोचिए इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय जो कि उत्तर प्रदेश में कानून व्यवस्था की राज की स्थापना करता है यह निगरानी करता है कि प्रदेश में कानून व्यवस्था सुचारू रूप से चल रही है कि नहीं खुद वही जन सूचना अधिकार 2005 के तहत मांगी गई सूचनाओं को नहीं दे रहा है क्या यह अराजकता का द्योतक नहीं है जब भी इमानदारी है तो उन्हें सारी सूचनाएं दे देनी चाहिए इस तरह से टालमटोल नहीं करना चाहिए क्योंकि जब वही नियम तोड़ेंगे तो दूसरे से नियम का पालन कैसे कराएंगे

    ReplyDelete
  3. It seems that right to information act 2005 has been put into the dustbin by our public functionaries because of the rampant corruption in the working of public authorities in the state of Uttar Pradesh including High court of judicature at Allahabad and its subordinate courts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Central public information officer High court of judicature at Allahabad had to provide the information but he did not do so because of the corruption in the working of judiciary but it is the obligated duty of the accountable public functionaries to take appropriate action in the matter as the matter concerns dignity of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post