Wednesday, April 6, 2022

Grievance concerning assistant labour commissioner Mirzapur cryptically sent to D.M. Prayagraj and they told CMO it concernes MZP


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/08782
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India to overcome lawlessness and anarchy on behalf of Sudarshan Maurya. Whether a matter concerning deep irregularity can be bypassed on the flimsy ground that the matter is amenable before quasi-judicial court It is dead certain that the chief minister office has supervisory power over the function of the lower judiciary along with the administrative control of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and function of quasi-judicial staff comes under the ambit of the Government of Uttar Pradesh directly. Here an aggrieved applicant submitted against the arbitrary issue of notices to parties without considering the pros and cons of the matter and overlooking its jurisdiction consequently concerned assistant labour commissioner crossed the boundary of its powers delegated by the government. Which is subject to the government to keep its vigilant eyes over such lawlessness and anarchy and obligatory duty of the citizens to bring such matters to government. Government ought to order an inquiry which must be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner. To neglect the matter only promotes law breakers in the society.
In the court of Assistant Labour Commissioner District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Case number-P.W./01/2022 Prayer-Notice issued through letter number- 78-80 dated 27-01-2022 against Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is ultra vires to Payment of Wages Act, 1936 therefore liable to be quashed because based on the concealed and false facts of the case. More details are attached to this representation. Object of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 The Payment of Wages Act regulates the payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in industry and its importance cannot be under-estimated. The Act guarantees payment of wages on time and without any deductions except those authorised under the Act. The Act provides for the responsibility for payment of wages, fixation of wage period, time and mode of payment of wages, permissible deduction as also casts upon the employer a duty to seek the approval of the Government for the acts and permission for which fines may be imposed by him and also sealing of the fines, and also for a machinery to hear and decide complaints regarding the deduction from wages or in delay in payment of wages, penalty for malicious and vexatious claims. The Act does not apply to persons whose wage is Rs. 24,000/- or more per month. The Act also provides to the effect that a worker cannot contract out of any right conferred upon him under the Act. This implies that Payment of Wages Act, 1936 deals with the dispute between employer and employees but not between a contractor and a common man who had given contract to construct house to contractor Yakoob Ansari S/O Siddik Mia who is plaintiff number 1 in the aforementioned plaint. Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia itself accepted in the complaint dated 07 June 2021 that he used to take contracts of the construction of houses. This implies that he is a contractor and others i.e. from plaintiff number 3 to 6 are the workers employed by contractor Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia. We notice receivers Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya do not know plaintiff number 3 to 6. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1. Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is the defendant 1 served the notice to Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Mohammad Siddik Mia and his son Farook Ansari S/O Yakoob Ansari to pay detriment occurred to defendant Rs.803885.00 because of the dereliction of the contractor. Aforementioned still not compensated the loss but trying to deviate from real issue through aforementioned notice. Sir that executive officer municipality Mirzapur city submitted the aforementioned report under his sign on 09-09-2021 bearing letter number 210 , for more feedback, vide attached document.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित प्रकरण का संबंध जनपद मिर्जापुर से है
Rating Remarks
Undoubtedly chief minister office government of Uttar Pradesh sent matter to the district magistrate prayagraj while the Matter was concerned with the assistant labour commissioner district Mirzapur so whatever wrongly done by the chief minister office that is mockery of the law of land and showing incompetence of the concerned staff of the chief minister office. It is quite obvious that complainant submitted the reminder clarification on the public grievance portal so that mistakes of law could be avoided. Since the mistake was done by the chief minister office deliberately consequently they overlooked the reminder /clarification of the compliment and continued their wrong path. Whether in a healthy democratic setup the grievances submitted by the people of state redressed by the accountable public functionaries of the government in this way? To establish the faith of the common people in the function of state machinery, an independent enquiry must be ordered which may be carried out in transpare
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
Contact Number
Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)
Reminder Date
It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the working of the labour commissioner Mirzapur but it was sent to D.M. Prayagraj arbitrarily in cryptic manner. Vide संदर्भ संख्या : 60000220024134 , दिनांक - 27 Mar 2022 तक की स्थिति आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:-60000220024134 1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 21-02-2022 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-प्रयागराज , 25-03-2022 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित 2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 24-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-प्रयागराज ,पुलिस 25-03-2022 प्रकरण का संबंध जनपद मिर्जापुर से है। निस्तारित