Bank of India arbitrarily closed grievance dated 2nd March by submitting report dated 19 Jan of Vidya Devi regarding death claim

 



Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2022/16424
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
02/03/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description
Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Misbehaviour/Harrassment/Corruption by Bank Staff

Bank/Financial Institute : Bank of India
Branch / Name of Bank and Branch : Wellesley Ganj branch of Bank of India Mirzapur city
-----------------------
An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of my 73 years old mother Vidya Devi W/O Late Rajendra Pratap Singh regarding the death claim languishing in the Bank of India for many months. More than two dozen grievances cum complaints have been submitted before the accountable public functionaries of the government of India but outcome remained nil. Whether the human rights of the vulnerable section specially widows and old are safe in this largest democracy in the world.
Following grievance submitted by my younger brother Arun Pratap Singh.
Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2022/10581 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Arun Pratap Singh Date of Receipt 08/02/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Financial Services (Banking Division)
Aggrieved with the improper disposal of the grievance, Arun Pratap Singh submitted appeal as follows.
Appeal Number DEABD/E/A/22/0003607 Date of Receipt 24/02/2022
Appeal Text-It is quite obvious that in order to remove your objection that on the affidavit, my signature is not available. I had visited your branch along with my elder brother Mahesh Pratap Singh alias Yogi M. P. Singh and concerned staff dealing with the file of death claim verified my Aadhar card and signature in front of many other customers and other objections were also removed. Therefore resolve the matter under intimation to the aggrieved applicant.
Following remarks made by the aggrieved complainant Arun Pratap Singh
Sir, I had already submitted my consent before the branch manager but you did not accept those. Sir we brothers already had left our legal claim in support of my mother as we think that money in the account of my father is the only legal right of my mother but staff of the bank deliberately created hindrance that was unusual as well as mysterious and cryptic. Because of corruption and growing immoral values in the society, it is natural that bank staff do not believe that sons can leave their shares
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed   
Date of Action
03/03/2022
Remarks
महोदय/महोदया, हम इस संदर्भ में आपको अवगत कराते हैं कि हमारे बैंक ने ग्राहक से पत्र / ईमेल के माध्यम से संवाद किया है। आपके सुलभ संदर्भ हेतु यहाँ उसकी प्रतिलिपी संलग्न करते है। अतः इस शिकायत को हमारे स्तर से बंद करने की अनुशंसा करते है। सादर Sir/Madam, We Hereby apprise that our bank has communicated to the customer. The same is attached herewith for your ready reference. Hence, we recommend for closure of the same at our end. Regards
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Whether it is not reflecting deep rooted corruption in the working of Bank of India especially its branch Wellesley Ganj Mirzapur City district Mirzapur who have submitted the report of 19th January 2022 to dispose of the grievance dated 2nd March 2022? They are well apprised of the fact that entire formalities have been completed on the part of aggrieved claimant Vidya Devi and whatever objections made by the staff of the bank through various communications have been overcome. Whether it is not proved that because of the embezzlement culture they are procrastinating on the matter their working style is full of corruption. There are two kinds of evidence of corruption first is direct evidence and second is circumstantial evidence are indirect evidence. Circumstantial evidences are crying of deep rooted corruption in the working of the staff of the Bank of India.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
DEABD/E/A/22/0003959
Date of Receipt
03/03/2022
Appeal Text
Concerned staff of the Bank of India have submitted arbitrary and inconsistent reply in the matter which is unconstitutional and not acceptable to the aggrieved applicant. It reflects the insolence of the concerned staff at the Bank of India and also showing the laxity on the part of monitoring bodies who are monitoring the activities of the subordinates. Whether it is not reflecting the rampant corruption and tyranny in the working of the concerned staff? Undoubtedly government functionaries are looking this lawlessness and anarchy of the concerned staff at the Bank of India who are acting like law breakers.
Current Status
Appeal Received
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
SMT MANASI MANOJ PHENE (Deputy General Manager)
Organisation name
Bank of India
Contact Address
Star House, C-5, G-BlockBandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East,Mumbai-400 051
Email Address
HO.cebb@bankofindia.co.in
Contact Number
02266684479
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

3 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Concerned staff of the Bank of India have submitted arbitrary and inconsistent reply in the matter which is unconstitutional and not acceptable to the aggrieved applicant. It reflects the insolence of the concerned staff at the Bank of India and also showing the laxity on the part of monitoring bodies who are monitoring the activities of the subordinates. Whether it is not reflecting the rampant corruption and tyranny in the working of the concerned staff? Undoubtedly government functionaries are looking this lawlessness and anarchy of the concerned staff at the Bank of India who are acting like law breakers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bank of India is public sector bank and there must be transparency and accountability in the dealings of the staff of the Bank of India but their procrastination on the issue of providing death claim when the entire formalities have been completed time and again by the aggrieved lady can never be justified and reflects deep rooted corruption in the working of the Bank of India.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Whether it is not reflecting deep rooted corruption in the working of Bank of India especially its branch Wellesley Ganj Mirzapur City district Mirzapur who have submitted the report of 19th January 2022 to dispose of the grievance dated 2nd March 2022? They are well apprised of the fact that entire formalities have been completed on the part of aggrieved claimant Vidya Devi and whatever objections made by the staff of the bank through various communications have been overcome.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post