District judge Lucknow denied information after taking Rs. 200 as RTI Fee arbitrarily to Dinesh Pratap Singh such is transparency of judiciary


E-COURTS

OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF DISTRICT COURTS

Back

Daily Status Chief Judicial Magistrate

In the court of :A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29 CNR Number :UPLK040047752011

Case Number :Cri. Case/4003282/2011 State of Uttar Pradesh  versus  DINESH PRATAP SINGH

Date  : 07-01-2022  Business : d Next Purpose : Evidence

Next Hearing Date : 21-03-2022 A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29

 





Case Type: Cri. Case
Filing Number: 4003282/2011Filing Date: 26-04-2011
Registration Number: 4003282/2011Registration Date: 10-09-2013
CNR Number: UPLK04-004775-2011

Case Status
First Hearing Date: 13th August 2012
Next Hearing Date: 21st March 2022
Case Stage: Evidence
Court Number and Judge: 29-A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29
Petitioner and Advocate1) State of Uttar Pradesh
    Advocate- e


Respondent and Advocate1) DINESH PRATAP SINGH


Acts
Under Act(s) Under Section(s)
INDIAN PENAL CODE 406,420,448
FIR Details
Police Station: ASHIYANA
Case Transfer Details within Establishment
Registration Number Transfer Date From Court Number
and Judge To Court Number
and Judge
4003282/2011 03-04-2018 40 - A.C.J.M. COURT NO.26 71 - A.C.J.M. (A.P.) CBI
4003282/2011 05-01-2021 71 - A.C.J.M. (A.P.) CBI 29 - A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29
An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to seek information regarding the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow.

To

                     District Judge Lucknow

                 ADDRESS:- District & Sessions Court Lucknow

           Kaisarbagh;  P.S.-Wazeerganj;

                                          Lucknow-226001 (Uttar Pradesh) India

Subject-To seek information regarding the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow. Colour photographs of the communication attached to this RTI Application as first two pages of the attached document. For more information, vide attached annexure 1 and 2. 

Most respectfully sheweth that

1-Annexure 3 is the receipt of postal department addressed to District Judge Lucknow and annexure 4 is speed post tracking of postal department showing that communication despatched on 13/10/2019 and received in the office of District Judge Lucknow on 16/10/2019. For more feedback, vide annexure 3 and 4.

2-Annexure 5,6 and 7 are the quotes in the order dated  07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad. 

Sought Information-Applicant seeks following information point-wise.

1-Please provide notings made by the competent staffs of the district court Lucknow on aforementioned representation cum questionnaire. 

2-Please provide the current status of the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow.

3-Right to reason is indispensable part of sound judicial system consequently information seeker is seeking reason if communication is not reached to its destination. 

4-Please provide the reason of not displaying case number 269 of the year 2009 under E-court scheme which ambitious scheme of the government to computerize entire court cases and government is spending huge funds for this purpose. 

Date-18-10-2021                                          Yours sincerely

                                                    

                                                          Dinesh Pratap Singh C/O Yogi M. P. Singh 

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Requisite fee as prescribed under High court RTI rule payable to district judge Lucknow is attached to this application. 

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

2 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. To seek information regarding the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow.
    Please provide notings made by the competent staffs of the district court Lucknow on aforementioned representation cum questionnaire.
    Please provide the current status of the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow.
    Right to reason is indispensable part of sound judicial system consequently information seeker is seeking reason if communication is not reached to its destination.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is the obligatory duty of the accountable public functionaries in this largest democracy in the world to curb the tyranny and rampant corruption in the judiciary of this country which is quite obvious from the the working style of our judges. Think about the gravity of situation that applicant is seeking information concerning with the communication sent to the the district judge Lucknow but he is not providing whether it is not corruption.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post