Information sought concerned with enquiry carried out by district judge not provided by Dept. of law so appeal submitted against PIO



Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number DPLAW/A/2021/60049

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 30-12-2021

Request filed with Law Department

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 9454412484

Email-ID santlal10266@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Law Department

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number DPLAW/R/2021/60086

Request Registration Date 12/09/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

* PIO of Public Authority approached RAM CHANDRA VERMA (Nyay-2)

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number DPLAW/R/2021/60086 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 12/09/2021 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 13/09/2021 Sir, three months 17 days passed but the concerned public information officer of the department of Law did not provide the sought information which is a mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005, Subject to the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 5 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9: This implies that public information officer violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 which cannot be overlooked. If the department of law itself has no regard for the law of land, then what can be expected from others? This is the root cause of lawlessness and anarchy in the state.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided


Registration Number DPLAW/A/2021/60049

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 30/12/2021

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 30/12/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454412484

Email-ID santlal10266@gmail.com

Registration Number DPLAW/R/2021/60086

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 12/09/2021

Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 13/09/2021

Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9454411614, Email Id:- adhinashtn@gmail.com

Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454412484

Email-ID santlal10266@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Law Department

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DPLAW/R/2021/60086

Date of Filing 12/09/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Applicant submitted complaint regarding irregularity, arbitrariness and tyranny in the High court of Judicature at Allahabad on 03 June 2013 and 21 April 2014 and after taking the pledge of the oath taker which means information seeker cum aggrieved applicant subsequently Honourable High court nominated district and session judge Mirzapur as enquiry officer in the matter. District and session judge Mirzapur through its communication dated 16 Aug 2018 invited information seeker to appear in person on 17 Sept 2018 at 4 O clock in the evening in his chamber. For more detail, vide first page of the attached PDF document to this representation cum R.T.I. Request. On 17 Sept 2018 at 4 O clock, information seeker submitted his submissions orally lasted more than half an hour and finally submitted written representation along with supportive annexures quite obvious from page 2 to page 5 of the attached PDF document to this representation cum R.T.I. Request. After taking witness testimony, no communication was exchanged either by district Judge or by High court of Judicature at Allahabad. 

1-Lower Judiciary is monitored by the state government and concerned High court consequently department of law and justice may provide the following information. 

Please provide the outcome of the aforementioned enquiry if available to them. 

2-Time taken by the enquiry officer to provide its findings to the concerned mandate if nominator not fixed time to complete enquiry. 

3-Provide the rule if any exists which prohibits High court of Judicature at Allahabad to provide outcome of enquiry to aggrieved complainant. 

4-Provide the maximum time duration taken by District Judge Mirzapur under the law to complete the enquiry concerned with alleged irregularities. 

5-District Judge Mirzapur may provide the information whether he furnished the enquiry report to High court of Judicature at Allahabad, if not why? if yes, then provide the date of report and date when made available to High court of Judicature at Allahabad.

* Concerned PIO RAM CHANDRA VERMA (Nyay-2)

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

2 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. 1-Lower Judiciary is monitored by the state government and concerned High court consequently department of law and justice may provide the following information.

    Please provide the outcome of the aforementioned enquiry if available to them.

    2-Time taken by the enquiry officer to provide its findings to the concerned mandate if nominator not fixed time to complete enquiry.

    3-Provide the rule if any exists which prohibits High court of Judicature at Allahabad to provide outcome of enquiry to aggrieved complainant.

    4-Provide the maximum time duration taken by District Judge Mirzapur under the law to complete the enquiry concerned with alleged irregularities.

    5-District Judge Mirzapur may provide the information whether he furnished the enquiry report to High court of Judicature at Allahabad, if not why? if yes, then provide the date of report and date when made available to High court of Judicature at Allahabad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. उपरोक्त सूचनाएं उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार के न्याय विभाग को anti-corruption क्रुसेडर योगी एमपी सिंह को उपलब्ध करा देना चाहिए क्योंकि बहुत मेहनत के बाद उपरोक्त जांच की गई थी जिसमें योगी एमपी सिंह द्वारा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के समक्ष हलफनामा प्रस्तुत किया गया फिर उसके बाद वहां का विजिलेंस विभाग मामले की जांच जनपद न्यायाधीश मिर्जापुर को सौंपा था और उस जांच के बाद क्या हुआ है वह जांच किस ठंडे बस्ते में डाल दी गई इसका कोई पता नहीं जब न्याय विभाग जन सूचना अधिकार के तहत प्रार्थी को सूचना नहीं मिलेगा तो प्रार्थी को कैसे सूचना मिलेगा जबकि उपरोक्त मामले में क्या कार्यवाही हुई प्रार्थी को यह जानने का मौलिक हक है

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post