Fwd: The matter concerns lawlessness and anarchy of the registry of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission being overlooked by the government.



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:47 AM
Subject: The matter concerns lawlessness and anarchy of the registry of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission being overlooked by the government.
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, Presidents Secretariat <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, <hgovup@up.nic.in>, <csup@up.nic.in>, sec. sic <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, <sec.sic@gov.in>, <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>


Whether it is justified that whatever may be grievance, the registry of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission may submit the same parrot report which is arbitrary and sheer inconsistent to the grievance or submitted appeal?
With due respect, the applicant invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-I pray before the Honourable Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that following appeal submitted on 17 Oct 2021 on the RTI portal and forwarded to Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 24 Oct 2021 which means more than two months passed but concerned First Appellate Authority of the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission did not take any action on the matter while he had to entertain the appeal within one month from the date of submission of the appeal. 
Registration Number UPICM/A/2021/60037
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 17/10/2021
Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 24/10/2021
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 05222724941, Email Id:- sec.sic@gov.in
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 05222724941
Email-ID
3-I pray before the Honourable Sir that following is the detail of the aforementioned submitted appeal. 
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
 
* Public Authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission
 
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number UPICM/R/2021/60173
Request Registration Date 12/09/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Madir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
* PIO of Public Authority approached Tejaskar Pandey
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Sir - The candidate has sought information on four points which you have not given, either you don''t know anything  or you are completely incompetent. Because you do not even know what the complainant wants? What is he concerned with? Sir, The candidate is upset that corrupt and bribe-ridden people are being appointed by the Government which is making a mockery of the RIGHT to Information Act.  What will those who do not have the capacity to read and understand the application give information?  Sir, the candidate is an anti-corruption crusader and has started crusade against corruption for the last 25 years. Think of the information given in the case presented by the applicant, that is, the same information has been sought. Undoubtedly sought information they did  not make available. Just as a thief is always swallowing when caught by the police, he has not stolen, the same is the case with the State Information Commission at present. Today, if there was honesty, transparency and accountability in the work., there would have been no need to be swallowed up. Now, the first appellate officer will say that the information provided by him is as per rules and will  not make efforts to try to find out what information has been sought? Today, if they had not passed by copying, they would have qualified and then gullible and innocent people would not have faced this anarchy. The truth of the Right to Information act 2005  is being seen by everyone and its ramification  that this right of gullible and innocent people  is only running on the ventilator of the Intensive Care Unit in this age of corruption.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) 

4-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that पंजीकरण संख्या UPICM/R/2021/60173

नाम Yogi M P Singh

फाइलिंग की तारीख 12/09/2021

स्थिति आवेदन को निस्तारण करना दिनांक 15/10/2021

Reply :- आयोग द्वारा निर्गत आदेश दिनांक 06.09.2016 में दी गयी व्यवथानुसार शिकायत/अपील से सम्बन्धित पत्रावलियों का निरीक्षण किया जा सकता है तथा रजिस्ट्रार, उ0प्र0 सूचना आयोग के आदेश पत्रांक 111/उ0प्र0सू0आ0/ रजिस्ट्रार/1(1) / 2019 दिनांक 30.07.2021 के क्रम में शिकायत/अभिलेख की पत्रावली के अभिलेखों की प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्राप्त करने की व्यवस्था प्राविधानित है,

The matter concerns the email communication dated-23 April 2021 of chief secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh to webmaster Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission with request -Respected Sir/ Madam The trailing forwarded for action as per rules. On 23 April 2021 an email was forwarded by the office of His Excellency Honourable President of India.to the chief secretary Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Factual position is that the chief secretary office forwarded my complaint to Uttar Pradesh State Information commission which was not an appeal so how can he treat forwarded email as appeal to avoid accountability as they are bound to take action on the communication of government. 

For more feedback, please visit following link

State Information Commission Uttar Pradesh has exceeded every limit of corruption which culminates lawlessness and anarchy in state


5-I pray before the Honourable
 Sir that how can public functionaries in this largest democracy in the world may be mute spectators of this lawlessness and anarchy of the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission which sole motive is to crush the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 instead to be instrumental in providing information to the information seekers. Appointment of Babudom as commissioners and chief information commissioner in the state information commission is the root cause of this lawlessness and anarchy prevailed in the working of transparency ombudsmann. 

'बर्बाद गुलिस्तां करने को बस एक ही उल्लू काफी है/ 

हर शाख पे उल्लू बैठें हैं अंजाम ऐ गुलिस्तां क्या होगा।

 'बर्बाद ऐ गुलशन कि खातिर बस एक ही उल्लू काफी था/ 

हर शाख पर उल्लू बैठा है अंजाम ऐ गुलशन क्या होगा।'

This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon'ble Sir, how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon'ble Sir.

Date-31/12/2021                                                   Yours sincerely


                                                      Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,

Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar

 Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. I pray before the Honourable Sir that how can public functionaries in this largest democracy in the world may be mute spectators of this lawlessness and anarchy of the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission which sole motive is to crush the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 instead to be instrumental in providing information to the information seekers. Appointment of Babudom as commissioners and chief information commissioner in the state information commission is the root cause of this lawlessness and anarchy prevailed in the working of transparency ombudsmann.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post