Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60176
Name Ashutosh Singh
Date of Filing 09/06/2021
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 09/07/2021
Reply :- please find the attachment.
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60176
Date of Filing 09/06/2021
* Name Ashutosh Singh
Gender Male
* Address APC State II Literacy house , Kanpur Road
Pincode 226001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-8687593247
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought According to the investigation officer, section 307 of the I.P.C. was substituted section 323, 504,506 of the I.P.C. and reason was given police could not collect evidence.. Provide the following information point wise as sought.
1-Police may provide the medical report submitted before the court in the matter.
2- Whether to drop out of section 307 is the sole prerogative of the investigation officer, if yes provide the detail of the competent police officer who allowed the mockery of law and given freedom to sabotage the warrant case into summon case and paved way to shield the offenders.
3-Whether any court of law passed an order to drop out section 307 in the matter if passed, provide the copy of the order and also provide the copy of the order if senior rank police personnel passed the order to drop out section 307.
4-Whether quantum of injuries inflicted on the aggrieved by the offenders proved on medical report is the ground of drop out section 307 or cryptic arbitrary report of the investigation officer prepared by colluding with the offenders. Please provide reason if any provided by the investigation officer to drop out section 307.
5-F.I.R. against four offenders but charge sheet against only three, provide the reason of prosecuting agency and available comments of its investigation officer.
* Concerned PIO SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2021/60082
Name Ashutosh Singh
Date of Filing 13-07-2021
Request filed with POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
Contact Details
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60176
Request Registration Date 09/06/2021
* Name Ashutosh Singh
Gender Male
* Address APC State II Literacy house , Kanpur Road
Pincode 226001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-8687593247
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
* PIO of Public Authority approached SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Sir, according to subsection 1 d of the section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005-Every public authority shall provide reasons for its administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons. Whether quantum of injuries inflicted on the aggrieved by the offenders proved on medical report is the ground of drop out section 307 or cryptic arbitrary report of the investigation officer prepared by colluding with the offenders. Please provide reason if any provided by the investigation officer to drop out section 307. Here PIO did not provide the reason regarding drop out of section 307 of IPC arbitrarily by investigation officer by taking recourse of section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005. According to subsection 1 h of section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005 - Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen, information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.How the process of investigation will impede if the charge sheet has been sent to the court? You closed the chapter of apprehension by converting a warrant case into summon case by dropping out section 307 of IPC. As far as prosecution is concerned, you have made the mockery of law of land. Every point of information denied by the incompetent police officer by taking recourse of the section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005 cryptically to conceal corrupt dealings in the matter. I think that main criteria for selection on a public post must be honesty but if key post in the government will be occupied by the man of non-impeccable integrity then how honesty can be expected? Right to information act 2005 was brought up by the Government of India during the regime of the Congress to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public offices as the corruption was rampant in the government machinery but when the Bhartiya Janata party government came into power then it commenced to dilute the provisions of The right to information act 2005 and now the position of both yogi and Modi government is that not a single public information officer in the government is providing information to the information seekers which is quite obvious from the repeated denials of the information by the public information officers.
Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2021/60082
Name Ashutosh Singh
Date of Filing 13/07/2021
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 13/07/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
According to subsection 1 h of section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005 - Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen, information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.How the process of investigation will impede if the charge sheet has been sent to the court? You closed the chapter of apprehension by converting a warrant case into summon case by dropping out section 307 of IPC. As far as prosecution is concerned, you have made the mockery of law of land. Every point of information denied by the incompetent police officer by taking recourse of the section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005 cryptically to conceal corrupt dealings in the matter.
ReplyDeleteHere it is quite obvious that public information officer of the department of police in the state capital Lucknow did not provide information to conceal the wrongdoings of the department because he knows well that to drop out section 307 of the Indian penal code was completely unjustified and police did it because of the deep rooted corruption in the department and if he will provide the information then concerned police officer will be exposed.
ReplyDeleteEveryone knows that bureaucracy in the state of Uttar Pradesh is filled by incompetent personnel which is the root cause of the problem in this state of Uttar Pradesh.
If The police personnel concerned are honest then they must tell the victim reason of dropping out of section 307 from the offenders as they are well apprised to the fact that section 323 is just a summon case and by making the case summon they set he offenders scot free.
ReplyDeleteThink about the gravity of situation concerned Public Information Officer is concealing the information instead of promoting transparency and accountability in its working which is showing that something is wrong in the department of police in the state capital Lucknow.
Undoubtedly police is playing the role of a judge by taking arbitrary decisions like section 307 of the Indian penal code was changed into section 323 of the Indian penal code by the investigation officer is only showing the rampant corruption in the department of police.
ReplyDeleteRight to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to curb the corruption in the government machinery but police is not providing information under right to information act 2005 which is quite obvious from the post.
I am too much happy with the contents of the appeal submitted by the appellant and I think that concerned Police officers must read these texts thoroughly.
ReplyDeleteI am quite agreed with the viewpoint of the poster that not a single information is being provided by the Modi and yogi government functionaries. Even prime minister office and chief minister office are not providing information under the right information 2005.