Commissioner and district magistrate are chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Mirzapur Vindhyachal development authority

 


MIRZAPUR-VINDHYACHAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY




Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/60036

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 02/07/2021

Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY as on 07/07/2021

Details of Public Autority :- Infrastructural and Industrial Development Department.

vide registration number :- DOIID/R/2021/80028 respectively.

Note:- Further details will be available on viewing the status of the above-mentioned new request registration number.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454416808

Email-ID adm.lr.mi-up@gov.in


Registration Number DOIID/R/2021/80028

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 07/07/2021

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 07/07/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454412291

Email-ID soiid3.up@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/60036

Date of Filing 02/07/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Pincode Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought                                                                                                  The matter concerns the development authority Vindhya Vikas Pradhikaran which chairman is District Magistrate Mirzapur and Vice chairman is city magistrate Mirzapur and this authority works under the supervision of the City Magistrate Mirzapur. 

Applicant seeks the following information from the city magistrate, as departmental heads according to guidelines of the state information commission are public information officers of their respective departments. 

1-The RTI act 2005 was enacted by permission and authority of His Excellency, President of India. This act was enacted by the Parliament on 15.06.2005 and notified in the Gazette of India dated 21.06.2005. Which means more than 15 years passed since the date of enaction of this august act. According to subsection 1 b of section 4 of R.T.I. Act 2005, every public authority shall publish within 1 hundred and 20 days from the date of enactment this act, organization detail including salary perks and working detail including notification, gazette and budgets.  Please provide the information regarding action taken under subsection 1 b of section 4 of R.T.I. Act.

2-Date of posting of entire staffs with name and designation of the Vindhya Vikas Pradhikaran in district Mirzapur must be made available. 

3-Posting detail of the city magistrate in Mirzapur and original posting detail when he was commissioned as officer must be made available. 

4-Provide total development budget of Vindhya Vikas Pradhikaran of financial year 2019-20,  2020-21 and 2021-22 and its description with expenditure details. 

5- If some staffs posted earlier in the district and now their second or third posting in the district, then their earlier posting details must also be made available. 

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

5 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. How the matter was forwarded to public authority Infrastructural and Industrial Development Department when it was concerned with Mirzapur Vindhyachal Development Authority whose vice chairman is district magistrate Mirzapur itself.
    vide registration number :- DOIID/R/2021/80028 respectively.
    The matter concerns the development authority Vindhya Vikas Pradhikaran which chairman is District Magistrate Mirzapur and Vice chairman is city magistrate Mirzapur and this authority works under the supervision of the City Magistrate Mirzapur.
    Applicant seeks the following information from the city magistrate, as departmental heads according to guidelines of the state information commission are public information officers of their respective departments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When it is categorically stated in the application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005 on the online portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh that the matter concerns with the city magistrate Mirzapur then why concerned mandate forwarded the communique to a public authority which is not concerned with the matter as a cryptic style of the function.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When it was written explicitly in the application submitted under right to information act 2005 that matter concerns the city magistrate Mirzapur and detail was sought from the Vindhya development authority that is Mirzapur Vindhyachal development authority then why they are procrastinating by transferring it to other public authority which is not concerned with the matter.. Undoubtedly it is reflecting deep rooted corruption in the government machinery.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is a fact in the state of Uttar Pradesh that Yogi government is not providing single information concerned with the development carried out by the government of Uttar Pradesh which implies that development work ok is only being performed on the paper it's a ground reality is nothing. The motive of the government is to mislead the people of the country through the print and electronic media by circulating baseless report.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Undoubtedly it is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005. District magistrate Mirzapur deliberately forwarded the matter to the other public authority who is not concerned with the matter with the sole motive to conceal the information from the information seeker. Such practices must be stopped is the motive of right to information act 2005 which is to promote transparency and accountability in the working a public authority so that corruption may be controlled which is growing like Jungle fire.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post