If non payment of the salary of 27 months of Satyendra Singh Gorakhpur is justified, then why Yogi Govt. is running away

 





Registration Number DPTFW/A/2021/60025

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 30-05-2021

Request filed with Forest and Wildlife Department

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 9454413241

Email-ID vananubhag3@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Forest and Wildlife Department

   

Personal Details of Appellant: -

Request Registration Number DPTFW/R/2021/60036

Request Registration Date 25/03/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Pincode Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

* PIO of Public Authority approached Sushil Kumar 1

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the Status of R.T.I. Communique, it is quite obvious that R.T.I. request forwarded to the concerned public information officer on 25/03/2021 and today is 30/05/2021 which categorically implies that PIO has violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Think about the gravity of situation that government of Uttar Pradesh has nominated PIO to such an incompetent staff who does not know stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005. This is a humble request of the appellant to concerned appellate authority to recommend the government to appoint a competent staff at the post of public information officer and information sought by information seeker must be made available as soon as possible without any further delay. 

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

Registration Number DPTFW/A/2021/60025

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 30/05/2021

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 30/05/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454413241

Email-ID vananubhag3@gmail.com

Registration Number DPTFW/R/2021/60036

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 25/03/2021

Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/03/2021

Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9454412843, Email Id:- vananubhag1@gmail.com

Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454413241

Email-ID vananubhag3@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Forest and Wildlife Department

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant: -

Registration Number DPTFW/R/2021/60036

Date of Filing 25/03/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Pincode Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

* Description of Information Sought Divisional Forest officer Gorakhpur may take the perusal of page 2 of the attached PDF document as communication of Area Forest Officer Baki range Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh selection as I.F.S. addressed to Divisional Forest Officer Division-Gorakhpur Letter number-110 dated-01-Aug-2017. Please provide the noting and action taken report in regard to aforementioned communication to the information seeker.

* Concerned PIO Sushil Kumar 1

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

5 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Why did the department of forest Uttar Pradesh did not provide the following information even when half century communications cum representations disposed of arbitrarily by the divisional forest officer Gorakhpur?
    Divisional forest officer Gorakhpur may take the perusal of page 2 of the attached PDF document as communication of Area Forest Officer Baki range Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh selection as I.F.S. addressed to Divisional Forest Officer Division-Gorakhpur Letter number-110 dated-01-Aug-2017. Please provide the noting and action taken report in regard to aforementioned communication to the information seeker.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here it is quite obvious that the matter concerns with arbitrariness and tyranny of the concerned public staff of the department of forest Gorakhpur zone and it is quite obvious that 27 month salary was not provided by the concerned public staff of the postman of the department of the forest arbitrarily and now these staffs are running away from providing information that why did they not comply the request order of a senior officer in the matter concerned when he requested to the divisional forest officer Gorakhpur range to provide the salary of the aggrieved staffs of the department of the baki range.

    ReplyDelete
  3. भ्रष्टाचार से बहुत लोग पीड़ित हैं वर्तमान सरकार में भ्रष्टाचार बहुत अधिक है

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whether it is justified that government of Uttar Pradesh didn't provide 27 months salary of a daily wage staffs of the department of forest and when the representations are being submitted they are overlooking these representations for their arbitrary reports and these reports are being approved by the senior accountable public functionaries in the Government of Uttar Pradesh which is quite obvious from the post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a humble request of the appellant to concerned appellate authority to recommend the government to appoint a competent staff at the post of public information officer and information sought by information seeker must be made available as soon as possible without any further delay.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post