Vimal Kumar Rastogi is seeking CD from PIO, district court Budaun of district and session judge court functioning dated 11-10-2023





Your RTI Request filed successfully.

Please note down the following details for further references.

Registration Number DNBDU/R/2024/60009

Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Filing 12-04-2024

RTI Fee Received    50

Online Reference Number CPADSGPNG4

Transaction Status Success

Request filed with District Court Budaun

 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  

Telephone Number 6395555051

Email-ID sunitchandrajudge@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority District Court Budaun  

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DNBDU/R/2024/60009

Date of Filing 12/04/2024

* Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address Garhaiya, Shabajpur , Patiyali Sarai, Police station Kotwali

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9891680848

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought The information seeker submitted the following criminal revision before the District And Session Judge as follows -

In The Court Of : DISTRICT JUDGE, BUDAUN

CNR Number. : UPBN010083962023

Case Number. : Criminal Revision/0000190/2023

VIMAL KUMAR RASTOGI Versus State Of UP

Date: 11-10-2023

Case Details, Case Type- Criminal Revision

Filing Number- 8389/2023, Filing Date- 11-10-2023

Registration Number-190/2023, Registration Date- 11-10-2023

CNR Number- UPBN010083962023

Case Status

First Hearing Date-11-10-2023, Decision Date-02-02-2024

Case Status Case Disposed, Nature Of Disposal- Contested--DISMISSED

Court Number And Judge- 2-A.D.AND S.J., COURT NO.-1, BUDAUN

Most respected sir, for more details, please take a glance at the 4th and 5th page of the attached PDF document to this online RTI application.

The applicant wants to draw the kind attention to the following frivolous case filed by Dinesh Kumar Gupta against the applicant as

In The Court Of : A.D.AND S.J., COURT NO.-1, BUDAUN

CNR Number. : UPBN010005172024 Case Number. : Criminal Misc. Cases/0000057/2024 DINESH KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF UP

Case Details, Case Type- Criminal Misc. Cases, Filing Number- 512/2024, Filing Date- 17-01-2024

Registration Number- 57/2024, Registration Date- 17-01-2024

CNR Number- UPBN010005172024

Case Status

First Hearing Date- 17-01-2024, Next Hearing Date- 24-04-2024, Case Stage- Hearing

Court Number And Judge- 2-A.D.AND S.J., COURT NO.-1, BUDAUN

This frivolous case is based on the allegations of Dinesh Kumar Gupta that the applicant has not signed the plaint submitted by the counsel of the applicant and it has been signed by some other person which is most ridiculous for me.

Sought information by the information seeker - please provide the CD of the court functioning dated 11-10-2023 which is the date of the registration of the case as well as date of first hearing that took place before the court of the district and session judge.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided.

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Registration Number DNBDU/R/2024/60009

Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Filing 12/04/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 12/04/2024.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name District Court Budaun

Telephone Number 6395555051

Email-ID sunitchandrajudge@gmail.com
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. There is doubt that the concerned public information officer will provide information to the information seeker because of the fear that activities taking place in the court will come to the public domain.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post