Additional secretary LDA directed in-charge officer establishment to provide information within 15 days from date order passed

 L.D.A. must provide posting details of its staff if there is transparency and accountability in its working as track record is the poorest
कार्यालय : लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण, लखनऊ

प्रथम अपील संख्या-LKDPA/A/2024/60033 (श्री योगी एम०पी०सिंह बनाम जनसूचना अधिकारी, ल०वि०प्रा०)

सुनवाई तिथि-20.03.2024 ऑनलाइन मूल आवेदन दिनांक-12.12.2023

पत्रांकः LKDPA/A/2024/60033

दिनांक-20.03.2024

-: आदेश :-

अपीलार्थी श्री योगी एम०पी० सिंह पता मोहल्ला-सुरेकापुरम, लक्ष्मी नारायन बैकुण्ठ महादेव मन्दिर, जबलपुर रोड पिन-231001 द्वारा सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम-2005 की धारा-6 (1) के अन्तर्गत सूचना चाही गई है। प्राप्त ऑनलाइन आवेदन पत्र सम्बन्धित जनसूचना अधिकारी को अन्तरित किया जा चुका है। नियमानुसार निर्धारित अवधि में सूचना न प्राप्त होने / सूचना से असंतुष्ट होने पर आवेदक द्वारा दिनांक 10.02.2024 को ऑनलाइन प्रथम अपील आवेदन किया गया, जिसके क्रम में ऑनलाइन प्राप्त प्रथम अपील की सुनवाई दिनांक 20.03.2024 को नियत करते हुए अपीलकर्ता को सुनवाई हेतु सूचना प्रेषित की गई। सुनवाई की नियत तिथि पर अपीलकर्ता उपस्थित नहीं हुए। सम्बन्धित जनसूचना अधिकारी / उनके प्रतिनिधि उपस्थित हुए। सुनवाई के समय पत्रावली के परिशीलन से विदित हुआ कि अपीलार्थी को सूचना प्रेषित किये जाने का कोई अभिलेखीय साक्ष्य पत्रावली में उपलब्ध नहीं है।

अतः आदेशित किया जाता है कि प्रभारी अधिकारी-अधिष्ठान / ज०सू०अ०, ल०वि०प्रा० इस आदेश के पारित होने के 15 दिवस के अन्दर आवेदक के ऑनलाइन आवेदन के सापेक्ष नियमानुसार प्रदाय किये जाने योग्य सूचनाएं अपीलार्थी को उपलब्ध कराएं।

तद्नुसार प्रश्नगत ऑनलाइन प्रथम अपील निस्तारित की जाती है।

प्रतिलिपि-

अपर सचिव / प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण

3. प्रभारी अधिकारी-अधिष्ठान / ज०सू०अ०, ल०वि०प्रा० को अनुपालनार्थ। 4. श्री योगी एम०पी०सिंह पता-मोहल्ला-सुरेकापुरम, लक्ष्मी नारायन बैकुण्ठ महादेव मन्दिर, जबलपुर रोड पिन-231001

अपर सचिव / प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60033

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 10/02/2024

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 05/04/2024

Reply :- Order attached.

View Document 

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60033

Date of Filing 10/02/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Anil Bhatnagar

Phone No 

Email Id 

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted the RTI application on 12th of December 2023 which was forwarded to the concerned public information officer by the nodal officer on 13th December 2023. It is quite obvious that 2 months passed but the concerned public information officer did not provide information to the appellant which is a violation of the subsection 1 of Section 7 of the right to Information Act 2005 which must be taken into account by the first appellate authority in Lucknow development authority.. Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60530 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 12/12/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 13/12/2023 Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 7081101903, Email Id:- 

Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details. 

Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system but where is the reason of not entertaining of the application submitted under right to Information Act which had to be entertained by the public information officer as soon as possible if not he had to entertain within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of Section 7 of the right to Information Act 2005 but it was not done by him. 

According to the subsection 1d of Section 4 of the right to Information Act 2005, it shall be obligatory duty of every public authority to provide the reasons of its decisions to the parties concerned but it seems that public authorities even their public information officers have forgot this provision of the right to Information Act 2005 quite obvious from the arbitrary dealings of the public authorities and their public information officers. 

It is quite obvious that 19 years have passed since the date when the right to Information Act 2005 was ratified by the Government of India, but it is most unfortunate that public information officers in the country are not entertaining the RTI applications within stipulated time. Under the act. The Right to Information Act 2005 was introduced by the Government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities but because of rampant corruption in the working of the public authorities this August act could not reap its objectives quite obvious from the manifold increase in corruption and anarchy in the government machinery. This is a humble request of the appellant to the first appellate authority to direct the public information officer to provide information to the appellant at the earliest as well as initiate disciplinary proceedings against the public information officer for violating the subsection one of Section 7 of the right to Information Act 2005.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60530

Date of Filing 12/12/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Snigdha Chaturvedi

Designation Nayab Tehsildar

Phone No 9918001502

Email Id 

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not 

provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date 

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post