Gautam Budh Nagar Noida police is running away from providing information in GST fraud of 15000 crore rupees under RTI




The matter concerns Gautam Budh Nagar police have busted a gang of eight people who were unscrupulously misusing permanent account number (PAN) cards of 635,000 people for over five years and created 2,660 shell companies to evade Goods and Services Tax (GST) worth multiple crores, deputy commissioner of police (Noida) Harish Chander said on Thursday as reported Jun 02, 2023 04:48 AM IST by Hindustan Times. The suspects have been identified as Yasin Sheikh, 38, of Mumbai, Akash Saini, 21, of Sahibabad, Atul Sengar, 23, of Hathras, Avni, 25, of Noida, Deepak Murjani, 48, his wife Vinita, 45, Vishal, 20, and Rajeev, 38, (all Delhi). They were apprehended at their office in Madhu Vihar, Delhi. (Sunil Ghosh/HT Photo)  

Registration Number PCGBN/A/2024/60024

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 16/02/2024

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 18/03/2024

Reply :- kindly plz see the attachment

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name VISHAL PANDAY

Telephone Number 8595902504

Email-ID adcp-polhq.gb@up.gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE GAUTAM BUDDA NAGAR  

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number PCGBN/A/2024/60024

Date of Filing 16/02/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Harishchandra

Phone No 8595902505

Email Id dcp-polnoida.gb@up.gov.in

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought A-20240200203 Yogi M P Singh Public Information Officer Office - POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR 12/02/2024 

To 

                                                             Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners 7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010 Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pincode 231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911 

Details of the respondents- 1-PIO of Public Authority approached-Shakti Mohan Awasthi Designation-Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police. Mobile No 8595902511 Email Id adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202 

2-Concerned Appellate Authority- Harishchandra, Mobile No 8595902505, Email Id dcp-polnoida.gb@up.gov.in District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202 

Prayer- Public information officer denied information by taking recourse of subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 while the sought information does not concern the investigation. 

Short submissions of the appellant are as follows. 

1- It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that the matter concerns the corruption which must be investigated in transparent and accountable way in time bound manner. Section 173 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 

173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation. (1) Every investigation under this Chapter shall be completed without unnecessary delay. As soon as it is completed, the officer in charge of the police station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report. 

2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 categorically states that information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension, or prosecution of offenders is exempted from disclosure under right to information act 2005. 

3-This is a humble request of the appellant to the most respected member of the Information Commission that he must take the perusal of the first and second page of the attached pdf document to this appeal which is the denial of information by the concerned police officer. 

4-It is quite obvious that more than eight months have passed in the matter and the concerned investigation officer of the police is still withholding the information in the name of continuation of investigation in the matter which means if he provides the information it will impede the process of Investigation. 

5-Whether the concerned investigation officer could not submit chargesheet in the concerned competent court which was to be submitted by him as soon as it is completed according to subsection 1 of section 171 of the code of criminal procedure 1973. 

6-Right to information at 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number PCGBN/R/2024/60042

Date of Filing 17/01/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached Shakti Mohan Awasthi

Designation Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police

Phone No 8595902511

Email Id adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post