Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0003481
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Kiran Singh
Date of Receipt
13/01/2024
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns the working of the police commissioner state capital Lucknow. In the matter, police personnel grabbed the private road of the applicant partially.
It is quite obvious that in the following grievance submitted by the applicant, police sub inspector Mr. Anish Kumar Singh has submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent report which is a mockery of the law of land.
Whether the investigation officer can tell the applicant the person Vidyawati, wife of late Radheshyam who is the resident of 39 Laxmanpuri Faizabad Road. Lucknow is the local resident of the place under dispute or a land mafia? Everyone knows that land mafias are active in the capital Lucknow in large numbers who are acting under the patronage of the police so it must be investigated about the truth of the seller of the land whether she belongs to the local area or outside and how did he purchase the land if it belongs outside? Apparently the credentials are under cloud so it must be investigated. For the more details, vide attached document to the grievance,
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0085334
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Kiran Singh
Date of Receipt-23/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Mr. Anish Kumar Singh itself is stating in its report that the measurement of the plot of the applicant is 2615 square feet as well as alleging that applicant did not provide him documents of the plot is itself contrary. Can he provide the source of information to the applicant which provided him information about the measurement of the plot? Mr. Anish Kumar Singh is further stating in its report that the applicant purchased the land prom Mrs Shimla Devi wife of Ram sahai who provided this information to him? Undoubtedly the police are telling a lie in the report and submitting a concocted story in the name of investigation and supporting the offenders because they are also personnel of the Police Department. It is most surprising that police in their earlier reports never accepted that 16 feet wide Rd. which is the private road of the applicant belongs to the offenders? Initially police stated in their report that submersible pump and encroached land in the road belongs to the offenders and they have not encroached on the private road of the applicant. It seems that you are more close to the offenders which is the root cause you are adopting a biased approach in the matter.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
13/01/2024
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0085334
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Kiran Singh
Date of Receipt
23/12/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns the private road of the applicant which is not only being used by the opposition but also they grabbed some part of it by taking help of the concerned police. Police must maintain the earlier status quo which was before the grabbing of the land. The grabbing of land took place with the support of police. Police support opposition to grab the land and if aggrieved submitted complaint against illegal stand of the police then police is alleging harassment. Why did police interfere in the revenue matter is a matter of great concern? Vide attached document to the grievance. Where is the one foot road that must be explained by the station house officer of police station-Krishna Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and how private road of the aggrieved can be grabbed by offenders? The SHO of Krishna Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh should clarify where one foot road and how the private road of the victim can be grabbed by criminals? Most respected Sir, Kamla Dayal Sub Inspector, Local Intelligence Unit from whom the land owner has purchased the plot is second person and the land was purchased by the applicant from Mrs. Shimla Devi w/o Ram Sahai Yadav in the mediation of Shri Ram Balak Yadav S/o Shri Shankar Lal R/o Ali Nagar Sunhara and the dispute of this road was earlier arisen between the applicant and the land owner which was settled as an agreement and that agreement was made before the S.H.O. of Police Station Krishna Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh on 14th April, 2005, whose witnesses were Mr. Ram Balak Yadab S/O Mr. Shankar Lal resident of Ali Nagar Sunhara and Prem Prakash S/O Makka Lal resident of Kesari Kheda.
According to the agreement, 16 feet of the road has been given to the applicant Kiran Singh, the relatives of the landowner will never make any claim on it and will not sell it to anyone, the applicant has to use it.
Most respected Sir, it is clear from the attached reports that sometimes you say that the road of the applicant is safe and sometimes it is said that there is a 15 feet road on which Kamla Dayal has thrown the soil. and the wall has been raised, with whose permission Kamla Dayal did this?
You make it clear, anyone will throw soil anywhere, will get the wall constructed because she is a sub-inspector in the police.
On what basis are you saying that the land of the applicant and road are safe?
Has the measurement or paimise of the land been done by you? Sir, the fact is that you have not even made a spot inspection. You have made fun of the Jansunwai portal, the applicant again requests you to go to the facts of the case instead of closing the complaint by giving arbitrary answers on the portal and the opponents who have committed the crime of forcibly occupying land of the applicant may be subjected to penal proceedings. Without measuring the impugned land, Sub-Inspector Abhay Kumar Bajpai Police Station Krishna Nagar, Lucknow came to the conclusion that the criminals had not occupied the land. Please provide the feedback that Sub-Inspector Abhay Kumar Bajpai and others equipped with what technology provided by the police which is helpful in investigating the cases without going to the site and sitting in the police station.
The report was submitted by Mahesh Kumar Chowki In charge Vijayanagar, who contended that in the registration deed of the applicant, there is only 15 feet road instead of 16 feet and Sub-Inspector Kamla Dayal is throwing soil on it and has built a wall to save it from flowing i.e. the road of the applicant is being used by Kamla Dayal as her own road, just because she is a sub-inspector in the police and she is a woman. Sir, Mahesh Kumar Chowki In charge Vijayanagar justified the occupation of Kamla Dayal Sub Inspector Local Intelligence Unit, on the road of the applicant. Who knows what the deal behind the screen was. Lucknow Police has learned to mock the law. For more details, vide attached PDF document to the grievance containing agreement.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
11/01/2024
Remarks
श्रीमान जी अधीनस्थ की आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है अनुमोदित श्रीमान जी जांचोपरान्त आख्या प्रेषित है श्रीमान जी जांचोपरान्त आख्या प्रेषित है कृपया संलग्नक प्राप्त करें
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Mr. Anish Kumar Singh itself is stating in its report that the measurement of the plot of the applicant is 2615 square feet as well as alleging that applicant did not provide him documents of the plot is it self contrary. Can he provide the source of information to the applicant which provided him information about the measurement of the plot? Mr. Anish Kumar Singh is further stating in its report that the applicant purchased the land prom Mrs Shimla Devi wife of Ram sahai who provided this information to him? Undoubtedly police is telling a lie in the report and submitting concocted story in the name of investigation and supporting the offenders because they are also personnel the Police Department. It is most surprising that police in their earlier reports never accepted that's 16 feet wide Rd. which is the private road of the applicant belongs to the offenders? Initially police stated in their report that submersible pump and encroached land in the in in the road belongs to the offenders and they have not encroached the private road up the applicant. It seems that you are more close to the offenders which is the root cause you are adopting biased approach in the matter.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
Date of Receipt
Appeal Text
Current Status
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link