Aggrieved Anand Kumar Tiwari submitted grievance before PMO against tacit understanding between grabbers and police in land grabbing

Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2024/0002093

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Anand Kumar Tiwari

Date of Receipt

03/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the superintendent of police Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi and the applicant draws the kind attention to matter needs urgent action.

There are two types of evidence of corruption 1-direct evidence and 2-circumstantial evidence. Undoubtedly there is no direct evidence of corruption of police in the matter but circumstantial evidence itself stating that police provided the full support to the land grabbers which is the root cause the applicant is alleging that there is no impeccable integrity of the concerned police personnel in the matter because of they have adopted lackadaisical and partial approach in dealing with the matter which is quite obvious from there irresponsible and illogical reports submitted by them in dozens of grievances of the applicant on the public grievance portal at the Government of India. Instead of taking action against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, you have misused section 151 107 and 116 of the criminal procedure code which are preventive measures applied against the spirit of circular issued by D.G.P. office in compliance guidelines issued by High court of judicature at Allahabad to prevent misuse of preventive measures and such dereliction will only promote anarchy in the society and promote land grabbers.

It is quite obvious that in the following reference there is little improvement in the report of the police because in this report which is attached as a third page of the submitted PDF document to the grievance mentioned the name of the offenders correctly. Otherwise it is the same parrot reply as submitted earlier in more than dozen grievances.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0080772, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Anand Kumar Tiwari, Date of Receipt-05/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar PradeshIt is quite obvious from the report of the station house officer, police station-Chauri, district-Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi offenders Tej Dhar Tiwari and others did not put the tin shade in the land of the applicant in compliance of the order of the competent authority or court which means they put the tin shade forcibly on the land of the applicant quite obvious from the report of the police. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system so it is obligatory duty of the public information officer to provide the reason of not taking action in the matter of land grabbing against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code.

Most Superintendent of police district Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi, the applicant submits his representation point-wise as follows.

Police failed to take action in the matter of land grabbing so Dr. Umeshwar Prabhat Singh, circle officer Aurai provided a misleading report deliberately addressing the matter as the land dispute. The station house officer has already told appellant that no magistrate order has been passed in the matter in favour of land grabbers. Land grabbers have only support of police who are justifying through its cryptic sentences which is a mockery of the law.

Which means land of the applicant has been grabbed and now police are saying that do not ask offenders to remove the tin shade otherwise I will take action which means police supporting the grabbers.

The offenders have put the Tin shade in the abbadi land belonging to the family of the applicant and police did not take any action against the offenders and now saying that do not disturb the of peace otherwise I will take action against you which means they are safeguarding the tin shade which has been kept in the land of the applicant by colluding with police, this can never be justified.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Under process   

Date of Action

03/01/2024

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350 

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0000682

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Anand Kumar Tiwari

Date of Receipt

03/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the superintendent of police Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi and the applicant draws the kind attention to matter needs urgent action.

There are two types of evidence of corruption 1-direct evidence and 2-circumstantial evidence. Undoubtedly there is no direct evidence of corruption of police in the matter but circumstantial evidence itself stating that police provided the full support to the land grabbers which is the root cause the applicant is alleging that there is no impeccable integrity of the concerned police personnel in the matter because of they have adopted lackadaisical and partial approach in dealing with the matter which is quite obvious from there irresponsible and illogical reports submitted by them in dozens of grievances of the applicant on the public grievance portal at the Government of India. Instead of taking action against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, you have misused section 151 107 and 116 of the criminal procedure code which are preventive measures applied against the spirit of circular issued by D.G.P. office in compliance guidelines issued by High court of judicature at Allahabad to prevent misuse of preventive measures and such dereliction will only promote anarchy in the society and promote land grabbers.

It is quite obvious that in the following reference there is little improvement in the report of the police because in this report which is attached as a third page of the submitted PDF document to the grievance mentioned the name of the offenders correctly. Otherwise it is the same parrot reply as submitted earlier in more than dozen grievances. 

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0080772, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Anand Kumar Tiwari, Date of Receipt-05/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar PradeshIt is quite obvious from the report of the station house officer, police station-Chauri, district-Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi offenders Tej Dhar Tiwari and others did not put the tin shade in the land of the applicant in compliance of the order of the competent authority or court which means they put the tin shade forcibly on the land of the applicant quite obvious from the report of the police. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system so it is obligatory duty of the public information officer to provide the reason of not taking action in the matter of land grabbing against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code. 

Most Superintendent of police district Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi, the applicant submits his representation pointwise as follows.

Police failed to take action in the matter of land grabbing so Dr. Umeshwar Prabhat Singh, circle officer Aurai provided a misleading report deliberately addressing the matter as the land dispute. The station house officer has already told appellant that no magistrate order has been passed in the matter in favour of land grabbers. Land grabbers have only support of police who are justifying through its cryptic sentences which is a mockery of the law.

Which means land of the applicant has been grabbed and now police are saying that do not ask offenders to remove the tin shade otherwise I will take action which means police supporting the grabbers. 

The offenders have put the Tin shade in the abbadi land belonging to the family of the applicant and police did not take any action against the offenders and now saying that do not disturb the of peace otherwise I will take action against you which means they are safeguarding the tin shade which has been kept in the land of the applicant by colluding with police, this can never be justified.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received.   

Date of Action

03/01/2024

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievances, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post