Appeal made against inconsistent report of income tax

 


Appeal Details

Appeal Number

CBODT/E/A/23/0003936

Name

Yogi M. P. Singh

Appeal Received Date

19/09/2023

Reason Of Appeal

It seems that rule of law has been replaced by the rule of anarchy in this largest democracy in the world so nothing can be expected in this largest democracy in the world which will pursue the rule of law. I never accepted those transactions belong to the applicant and the emails sent to the applicant is a no reply email which is the root cause the applicant could not provide the proper reply to them. The email provided by the staff of the Department of income tax was not working and the representation sent by the applicant on that email but it did not reach to the Department of income tax. Later I sent that message to them through the public grievance portal but it is most unfortunate all the messages in the form of grievance sent to them they do not entertain which is mockery of the law of land. On the portal of the Department of income tax the applicant is frightened because of the cryptic dealings of the Department of income tax and I could not complete the formalities but I requested them they may correct the information and I requested them these transactions do not belong to the applicant so they may take appropriate action and do not send me notices which are illegal. As far as Department of income tax in which there is rampant corruption wants to take action against the applicant and wanted to send the applicant to jail then applicant is always ready to face such anarchy and ready to go into Jail.

Appeal Status

Appeal Closed (On 08/11/2023)

Closing Remarks

It is seen that Under the E Verification Scheme 2921 the ITO I and CI Allahabad has sought your reply or denial in respect of the receipt of the Rental Income of Rs.1,19,34,974 during the FY 2020-21 AY 2021-22 vide the statutory notices issued us 133 dated 8.06.2023 and 04.07.2023 sent through the electronic mode. Since the subject matter has not been dealt with by this division, no action called for.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Deepak Tiwari (Commissioner of Income Tax OSD Investigation CBDT)

Email Address

citosdinv-cbdt@gov.in

Contact Number

01123222192

Organisation name

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INVESTIGATION

Grievance Details

Registration Number

CBODT/E/2023/0036437

Name

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of receipt

01/08/2023

Address

Mohalla Surekapuram Colony Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir

State

Uttar Pradesh

District

Mirzapur

Mobile Number

7379105911

Email ID

yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Phone Number

Not Provided

Grievance Description

Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) >> Corruption/Malpractices related (VCs, employees) >> Inaction by Income Tax Department


Name and Designation of Officer: ITO Allahabad digitally signed by Mohammad Daud Ahmad

regional office / Office: Region UP (East)

This email is in the order of mobile conversation with Chitrasen Singh whose mobile number is 8005445446 and mobile number of the applicant is 7379105911. Which screenshot is attached as the fifth attachment to this email.

The notice was issued by ITO (I& CI) Allahabad.

Assessee is requested to reply to the notice dated 08/06/2023 with all supporting documents.

Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Notice u/s 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for XXXXX0850X, for FY: 2020-21.

noreply@insight.gov.in noreply@insight.gov.in 8 June 2023 at 12:08

To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Dear MAHESH PRATAP SINGH (XXXXX0850X),

Please find attached notice under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act,1961 in respect of DIN: INSIGHT/VER/02/133(6)/2023-24/8121000951120001, for FY: (2020-21) for necessary compliance.

The attachment is password protected. To open the attachment, please enter your PAN/TAN in upper case.

Regards,

Prescribed Authority

Income Tax Department

Short reply to the notice is as follows.

1-Four documents are attached herewith for the perusal of concerned accountable staff.

2-The matter concerns the blatant misuse of PAN Card and stream of notices is being served to the applicant instead of thorough investigation into the matter. Please help the applicant and take action against cheaters. From the CIBIL report made available by the branch manager of State Bank of India, 13 bank accounts attached with my PAN number connected with my Aadhar.

3-In regard to email communication of ITO Allahabad digitally signed by Mohammad Daud Ahmad Dated 08/06/2023. GSWPS0850Q - MAHESH PRATAP SINGH F.Y.2020-21 INSIGHT/VER/02/133(6)/2023-24/8121000951120001

Financial year 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23 Annual Information Statement and misuse of PAN Card details are attached.

4-Fraudulent transactions of Rs.16,12,06,667 concerning my PAN linked with my Aadhar are showing failure and corruption of banking institutions and the department of income tax.

Grievance Document

Final Reply

Under the E Verification Scheme 2921 the ITO I and CI Allahabad has sought your reply or denial in respect of the receipt of the Rental Income of Rs.1,19,34,974 during the FY 2020-21 AY 2021-22 vide the statutory notices issued us 133 dated 8.06.2023 and 04.07.2023 sent through the electronic mode. It has been clarified that the above information has been received from the 3rd party and they have uploaded the information regarding the above transaction on the portal of the Income Tax Department. The ITO or any other officer of the Department is not involved at all in the uploading of the information by the 3rd party. You have been given an opportunity to confirm or deny the above transactions by the Income Tax Department through the above statutory notices. It has been stated by Prescribed Authority that you have not replied to the above online notices till date. You are again requested to submit your reply or denial by logging on to your account on the e-filing portal and by clicking on the Compliance Management. If you have not received the rental income as mentioned above, then you are advised to submit your denial at the earliest by replying to the above notices in the manner explained above. In case of failure to submit response the ITO may take a view that the above information appearing on the portal of the Income Tax Department is correct and necessary action as per the SOP may be taken by him.

Communication Details

Sn. Date of Action Action From To

1 01/08/2023 RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE You Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax)

2 01/08/2023 REMINDER RECEIVED FROM COMPLAINANT You Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax)

3 18/09/2023 CASE DISPOSED OF Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) You

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

CBODT/E/A/23/0003936

Name

Yogi M. P. Singh

Appeal Recieved Date

19/09/2023

Reason Of Appeal

It seems that rule of law has been replaced by the rule of anarchy in this largest democracy in the world so nothing can be expected in this largest democracy in the world which will pursue the rule of law. I never accepted those transactions belong to the applicant and the emails sent to the applicant is a no reply email which is the root cause the applicant could not provide the proper reply to them. The email provided by the staff of the Department of income tax was not working and the representation sent by the applicant on that email but it did not reach to the Department of income tax. Later I sent that message to them through the public grievance portal but it is most unfortunate all the messages in the form of grievance sent to them they do not entertain which is mockery of the law of land. On the portal of the Department of income tax the applicant is frightened because of the cryptic dealings of the Department of income tax and I could not complete the formalities but I requested them they may correct the information and I requested them these transactions do not belong to the applicant so they may take appropriate action and do not send me notices which are illegal. As far as Department of income tax in which there is rampant corruption wants to take action against the applicant and wanted to send the applicant to jail then applicant is always ready to face such anarchy and ready to go into Jail.

Appeal Status

Appeal Closed (On 08/11/2023)

Closing Remarks

It is seen that Under the E Verification Scheme 2921 the ITO I and CI Allahabad has sought your reply or denial in respect of the receipt of the Rental Income of Rs.1,19,34,974 during the FY 2020-21 AY 2021-22 vide the statutory notices issued us 133 dated 8.06.2023 and 04.07.2023 sent through the electronic mode. Since the subject matter has not been dealt with by this division, no action called for.


Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Deepak Tiwari (Commissioner of Income Tax OSD Investigation CBDT)

Email Address

citosdinv-cbdt@gov.in

Contact Number

01123222192

Organisation name

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INVESTIGATION

Grievance Details

Registration Number

CBODT/E/2023/0036437

Name

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of receipt

01/08/2023

Address

Mohalla Surekapuram Colony Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir

State

Uttar Pradesh

District

Mirzapur

Mobile Number

7379105911

Email ID

yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Phone Number

Not Provided

Grievance Description

Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) >> Corruption/Malpractices related (VCs, employees) >> Inaction by Income Tax Department

Name and Desination of Officer : ITO Allahabad digitally signed by Mohammad Daud Ahmad

regional office / Office : Region UP (East)

This email is in the order of mobile conversation with Chitrasen Singh whose mobile number is 8005445446 and mobile number of the applicant is 7379105911. Which screenshot is attached as the fifth attachment to this email.

The notice was issued by ITO (I& CI) Allahabad.

Assessee is requested to reply to the notice dated 08/06/2023 with all supporting documents.

Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Notice u/s 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for XXXXX0850X, for FY: 2020-21.

noreply@insight.gov.in noreply@insight.gov.in 8 June 2023 at 12:08

To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Dear MAHESH PRATAP SINGH (XXXXX0850X),

Please find attached notice under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act,1961 in respect of DIN: INSIGHT/VER/02/133(6)/2023-24/8121000951120001, for FY: (2020-21) for necessary compliance.

The attachment is password protected. To open the attachment, please enter your PAN/TAN in upper case.

Regards,

Prescribed Authority

Income Tax Department

Short reply to the notice is as follows.

1-Four documents are attached herewith for the perusal of concerned accountable staff.

2-The matter concerns the blatant misuse of PAN Card and stream of notices is being served to the applicant instead of thorough investigation into the matter. Please help the applicant and take action against cheaters. From the CIBIL report made available by the branch manager of State Bank of India, 13 bank accounts attached with my PAN number connected with my Aadhar.

3-In regard to email communication of ITO Allahabad digitally signed by Mohammad Daud Ahmad Dated 08/06/2023. GSWPS0850Q - MAHESH PRATAP SINGH F.Y.2020-21 INSIGHT/VER/02/133(6)/2023-24/8121000951120001

Financial year 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23 Annual Information Statement and misuse of PAN Card details are attached.

4-Fraudulent transactions of Rs.16,12,06,667 concerning my PAN linked with my Aadhar are showing failure and corruption of banking institutions and the department of income tax.

Grievance Document

Final Reply

Under the E Verification Scheme 2921 the ITO I and CI Allahabad has sought your reply or denial in respect of the receipt of the Rental Income of Rs.1,19,34,974 during the FY 2020-21 AY 2021-22 vide the statutory notices issued us 133 dated 8.06.2023 and 04.07.2023 sent through the electronic mode. It has been clarified that the above information has been received from the 3rd party and they have uploaded the information regarding the above transaction on the portal of the Income Tax Department. The ITO or any other officer of the Department is not involved at all in the uploading of the information by the 3rd party. You have been given an opportunity to confirm or deny the above transactions by the Income Tax Department through the above statutory notices. It has been stated by Prescribed Authority that you have not replied to the above online notices till date. You are again requested to submit your reply or denial by logging on to your account on the e-filing portal and by clicking on the Compliance Management. If you have not received the rental income as mentioned above, then you are advised to submit your denial at the earliest by replying to the above notices in the manner explained above. In case of failure to submit response the ITO may take a view that the above information appearing on the portal of the Income Tax Department is correct and necessary action as per the SOP may be taken by him.

Communication Details

Sn. Date of Action Action From To

1 01/08/2023 RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE You Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax)

2 01/08/2023 REMINDER RECEIVED FROM COMPLAINANT You Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax)

3 18/09/2023 CASE DISPOSED OF Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) You

To see the notice of the income tax and reply of the applicant, please click on the link

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

3 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. How can it be justified that the first appellate authority may reject the appeal on the ground that the matter does not concern with him but it concerns with the other division. Undoubtedly, it was false report but in case if it was not concerned with the division of the first appellate authority then it could be sent to the respective division through appropriate proceedings instead of closing the appeal arbitrarily.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually they do not want to resolve the problems of the aggrieved people. If they will take action in such matters then their own man will be put behind the bar which is the root cause of inaction of the personnel of department of income tax.
    Department of income tax is ruled by anarchy and this anarchy is oriented from top to bottom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is quite obvious that concerned appellate authority can forward the grievance to the concerned division but it was not done by him which is reflecting a corrupt dealing must not be allowed by the government if the executive are promoting transparency and accountability in the governance but actually it is not done.
    Corrupt activities of cheaters has reached on its Zenith and government machinery is failed because of the corrupt activities of the public staff itself. Apparently it is visible to everyone that government itself is the promoter of the corrupt activities in the working of the department.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post