Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Kiran Singh
Date of Receipt
02/10/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Demand-To register an F.I.R. against police personnel who supported grabbing private road of applicant for the opposition party. This application is for the police to correct its role in the matter as it has already played a corrupt role which is the root cause of the problem and the need of hour is to rectify errors already made by it. Think about the parrot report of the sub inspector Vineet Kumar who is articulating in its report that the applicant is claiming 18 feet road in the land of opposition parties which means this Sub Inspector did not try to understand the contents of the grievance or you can say that this Sub Inspector did not understand the contents of the grievance which is the root-cause of such worthless report are being submitted by incompetent investigation officer in the matter.
Most respected sir to prepare a report by sitting in the office and to investigate the matter and submit a reasoned report both are different things which cannot be understood by the investigation officer of the police concerned. Who is harassing you? whether the applicant is harassing the police or the police is harassing the applicant as the police played the cryptic role in grabbing the private road of the applicant by having an understanding with the opposition party.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0056429
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Kiran Singh
Date of Receipt-26/08/2023 Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
To
Assistant Commissioner of police, Krishna Nagar circle
Police Commissionerate Lucknow
Subject-Please act against your subordinates who are submitting inconsistent parrot reports in the matter causing multiple complaints on the same matter because of laxity of your subordinates.
Short submissions in the matter are as follows.
1-Please take the perusal of the second page of the attached PDF documents to the grievance which is showing the dereliction of the duty of your subordinates. Your subordinate has submitted clutters in the form of report which is highly objectionable.
2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that Sir may take the perusal of the 5th page of the attached PDF documents to the grievance which is an agreement between the landlord and the applicant dated 14th of April 2005. Agreement was made in the Krishna Nagar police station before the accountable policy staff. In which the landlord itself accepted that registry of the land was done to Kiran Singh and the 16 feet road will also belong to Kiran Singh and the landlord will never interfere with it. It is noticeable that police have been habitual to tell bundles of Lies in the report because the applicant on a number of occasions submitted the paper of the registry before the accountable staff of the police.
3-Lucknow to police is habitual to take the law of land under teeth. First it supported the land grabbers to grab the private road of the applicant by overlooking the direction of the sub divisional magistrate and now suggesting the applicant to take shelter of the sub divisional magistrate while the grabbing took place with the help of the concerned chowki in-charge and in-charge of the Krishna Nagar police station.
4-If the applicant is defaulter, then why the Lucknow police is running away from the inquiry into the matter of land grabbing by a high powered team. This land grabbing has full support of the in-charge of the Krishna Nagar police station and concerned Chauki in-charge and same are investigation officers in the matter which is the root cause of such 3rd grade reports. It is noticeable that the opposition party also belongs to the police.
5-Whether justice is not available in the police Commissionerate Lucknow against the atrocity of the police who are habitual to take the law of land under teeth? How can it be justified that an assistant police commissioner may accept the reports of the subordinates by keeping his eyes and ears closed?
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
02/10/2023
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0056429
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Kiran Singh
Date of Receipt
26/08/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
To
Assistant Commissioner of police, Krishna Nagar circle
Police Commissionerate Lucknow
Subject-Please act against your subordinates who are submitting in consistent pirate reports in the matter causing multiple complaints on the matter because of laxity of your subordinates.
Short submissions in the matter are as follows.
1-Please take the perusal of the second page of the attached PDF documents to the grievance which is showing that the dereliction of the duty of your subordinates. Your subordinate has submitted clutters in the form of report which is highly objectionable.
2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that Sir may take the perusal of the 5th page of the attached PDF documents to the grievance which is an agreement between the landlord and the applicant dated 14th of April 2005. Agreement was made in the Krishna Nagar police station before the accountable policy staff. In which landlord itself accepted that registry of the land was done to the Kiran Singh and 16 feet road will also belong to the Kiran Singh and the landlord will never interfere with it. It is noticeable that police have been habitual to tell bundles of Lies in the report because the applicant on number of occasions submitted the paper of the registry before the accountable staff of the police.
3-Lucknow to police is habitual to take the law of land under teeth. First it supported the land grabbers to grab the private road of the applicant by overlooking the direction of the sub divisional magistrate and now suggesting the applicant to take shelter of the sub divisional magistrate while the grabbing took place with the help of the concerned chowki in-charge and the Krishna Nagar police station.
4-If the applicant is defaulter, then why the Lucknow police is running away ram the inquiry into the matter of land grabbing by high powered team. This land grabbing has full support of the in-charge of the Krishna Nagar police station and concerned Chauki in-charge and same are investigation officer in the matter which is the root cause of such 3rd grade reports. It is noticeable that here opposition party also belong to police.
5-Whether justice is not available in the police Commissionerate Lucknow against the atrocity of the police which are habitual to take the law of land under teeth? How can it be justified that assistant police commissioner may accept the reports of the subordinates by keeping his eyes and ears closed?
Following is the report of assistant commissio
The summary of the investigation is the allegations/allegations in the complaint letter. The complaints have been mentioned, point-wise report on them:
Sir, it is requested that the complaint application was processed, and the records of the police station Haja were examined, then the allegations mentioned on the applicant's application were investigated earlier by Sub-Inspector Shri Arjun Singh and the story was sent. The allegations levelled by the applicant are related to the land. A plot owned by Mrs. Kiran with a total area of 2615 square feet which was purchased by Mrs. Shimla Devi wife Ram Sahay. Smt. Vidyavati Wife SW Radheshyam resident 39 Laxman Puri Faizabad Road was from Lucknow, out of which Manoj Kumar Solanki and Kamla Dayal had sold 700 square feet of land. The application of which has been rejected on 05.01.2022. The applicant was asked to submit her forms in this regard, but she has not been able to submit any documents related to the land. Unnecessarily, they are telling the 16-foot path in each of the bad lands. Since the application is being made by the applicant. The applicant does not have any land related documents for the allegations nor is she submitting any form. The cases are related to revenue, it is possible to dispose of the application of the applicant only . Vide attached document to the grievance for more details.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
20/09/2023
Remarks
अनुमोदित श्रीमान जी रिपोर्ट सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है श्रीमान जी जांचोपरान्त आख्या प्रेषित है कृपया संलग्नक प्राप्त करें
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Think about the parrot report of the sub inspector Vineet Kumar who is articulating in its report that the applicant is claiming 18 feet road in the land of opposition parties which means this Sub Inspector did not try to understand the contents of the grievance or you can say that this Sub Inspector did not understand the contents of the grievance which is the root-cause of such worthless report are being submitted by incompetent investigation officer in the matter. Most respected sir to prepare a report by sitting in the office and to investigate the matter and submit a reasoned report both are different things which cannot be understood by the investigation officer of the police concerned. Who is harassing whether the applicant is harassing the police or the police is harassing the applicant as the police played the cryptic role in grabbing the private road of the applicant by having an understanding with the opposition party.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
Date of Receipt
Appeal Text
Current Status
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
To see the attached document to the grievance, click on the link