Tehsildar Lalganj submitted his report against the complaint of Sushila Devi and Tehsildar Lalganj claims no encroachment on drainage


 Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2023/0036883

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sushila Devi

Date of Receipt

11/02/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

The matter concerning Sushila Devi, wife of Hiralal Vishwakarma is being overlooked by the concerned police and the tehsil Lalganj.The details of the victim are as follows.Sushila Devi W/O Hiralal VishwakarmaAddress -Village-Semari Kalan, Post- Kanokhar, Tehsil -Lalganj, District -Mirzapur, PIn Code 231211, Panchayat Rajai, mobile number-9129540377 The details of the land grabbers are as follows.1-Shivchand son of Shri Ram VishwakarmaHe is posted as the Home guard so influences the activity of the police.The address is as aforementioned.2-Dilip Kumar Son of Shri Ram VishwakarmaThe address is as aforementioned.

Respected Sir who has given the authority to the opposite party to grab the land of the drainage which has been decided by the deputy director of consolidation. Whether the opposite party is not encroaching the direction passed by the deputy director of consolidation in regard to the controversial land that it belongs to the drainage.

The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951) Last Updated 3rd January, 2022 up205

Received the assent of the President on 24.01.1951 and published in the U.P. Gazette, Extra., dated 26.01.1951.

(As passed by the Uttar Pradesh State Legislature) As amended upto date

122B. Powers of the Land Management Committee and the Collector. - (1) Where any property vested under the provisions of this Act in a Gaon Sabha or a local authority is damaged or misappropriated or where any Gaon Sabha or local authority is entitled to take or retain possession of any land under the provisions of this Act and such land is occupied otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this Act, the Land Management Committee or local authority, as the case may be. shall inform the Assistant Collector concerned in the manner prescribed.

(2) Where from the information received under sub-section (1) or otherwise, the Assistant Collector is satisfied that any property referred to in sub-section (1) has been damaged or misappropriated or any person is in occupation of any land, referred to in that sub-section, in contravention of the provisions of this Act, he shall issue notice to the person concerned to show cause why compensation for damage, misappropriation or wrongful occupation as mentioned in such notice be not recovered from him or, as the case may be, why he should not be evicted from such land.

Here it is quite obvious that the matter invites the remedy under the aforementioned subsection 1 of section 122 B of the The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 but not feasible because of impeccable integrity of the Lekhpal concerned.

Short submissions are as follows.1-It is quite obvious from the first and second page of the attached documents to the grievance that earlier controversial land belongs to the applicant but later on deputy director of consolidation decided this land belongs to the drainage.2-The opposite party has muscle power and they always create disputes and hurls abuses on the family members of the applicant. They are making efforts to grab the controversial land belonging to the drainage as decided by the deputy director of consolidation. 3-respected Sir who has given the authority to the opposite party to grab the land of the drainage which has been decided by the deputy director of consolidation. Whether the opposite party is not encroaching the direction passed by the deputy director of consolidation in regard to the controversial land that it belongs to the drainage.4-The third and fourth page of the attached PDF document to the grievance is the report of the lekhpal submitted by the tehsil Lalganj on the jansunwai portal government of Uttar Pradesh.Instead of resolving the issue, lekhpal bade Lal Dube is submitting cryptic and mysterious reports and making the issue complicated instead of resolving it.5-Undoubtedly the family of the applicant is living in a transitory land quite obvious from the report of the lekhpal Bade Lal Du

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

14/03/2023

Remarks

प्रकरण में सम्बंधित से आख्या प्राप्त कर निस्तारण हेतु प्रेषित है आख्या संलग्न है महोदय जांच आख्या संलग्न है महोदय जांच आख्या संलग्न है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

महोदय तहसीलदार लालगंज ने प्रार्थनी पर यह आरोप लगाया है कि प्रार्थिनी अपने आराजी नंबर 162 का सीमांकन चाहती है परोक्ष रूप में । श्रीमान जी ऐसा महसूस होता है कि तहसीलदार को प्रार्थिनी का शिकायत समझ में नहीं आया प्रार्थिनी द्वारा कहीं भी आराजी नंबर 162 के सीमांकन का जिक्र भी नहीं किया गया है ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि तहसीलदार लालगंज इस ढंग के निराधार आरोप लगाने के आदी हैं अन्यथा प्रार्थी ने जो आरोप लगाया है वह अक्षरसह सत्य है और प्रार्थी अपेक्षा करता है कि भविष्य में तहसीलदार लालगंज द्वारा शब्द हीन होने पर इस ढंग के बेबुनियाद आरोप प्रार्थिनी पर न लगाए जाएं अगर तहसील लालगंज की कार्यशैली में पारदर्शिता और जवाबदेही होती तो इतनी बड़ी समस्या प्रार्थिनी के समक्ष कभी पैदा ना होती प्रकरण तो पुलिस के समक्ष भी गया किंतु कोई भी सारगर्भित हल नहीं निकला यदि प्रार्थी का आरोप निराधार है तो प्रार्थिनी को शिकायत लिखने का कोई शौक नहीं है शिकायत लिखने में मेहनत लगता है लेखपाल और तहसीलदार महोदय को तो अपने ऑफिस में बैठकर जवाब लगाना है वह भी बेबुनियाद बातों को आंख्या में शामिल करके आख्या को अपभ्रंश करने की आदत है

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post