Anil Kumar Maurya seeking action against land grabbers but Tehsil Sadar is submitting inconsistent and illogical report on government portal


 

Successful Registration

Your communication has been registered successfully with the following registration number:

PMOPG/E/2023/0031092

Note: Kindly Note Your Registration Number for further references.


An email / sms has been sent to the email address / mobile number provided by you.

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2023/0031092

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Anil Kumar Maurya

Date of Receipt

04/02/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

An application under article 51A of the constitution of India on behalf of my father Gulabdhar Maurya Son of late Amarnath Maurya resident of village and post Lohiya Talab district Mirzapur to make enquiry regarding the compliance of the endorsement order passed by the Honourable sub divisional magistrate Sadar Mirzapur 28 September 2021. This order was addressed to the station house officer Kotwali Katra district Mirzapur quite obvious from the second page of the attached documents.It is quite obvious that one year and two months passed but no action was taken by the concerned to free the land of the applicant from the clutches of land mafia.The disposal of the following grievance has been done by the Lekhpal concerned through indiscriminate report through an absurd suggestion of seeking justice under section 116 of revenue code 2006 in the matter of Land grabbing which must be strictly dealt with by the police. The root cause of corruption is the arbitrary dealings of the bureaucracy which must be curbed otherwise there will be manifold increase in the corruption. What a bad precedent is being setup instead of punishing the land grabbers, the victim is being misled in the wrong way. Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2023/0005044 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Anil Kumar Maurya Date of Receipt 05/01/2023It is clear from the report of Lekhpal concerned that both the father of the applicant and the opposite party have purchased the land from the same account number, but the entire land has been occupied by the opposite party, that means the share of the applicant land has also been occupied.  It has been clarified by the applicant that the demarcation of the part of the applicant side has been done by Tehsil Sadar under Section 24 Revenue Code 2006.  But the opposition refused to accept that demarcation.  Sir, everyone knows what is the working style of police and tehsil, now the applicant can fulfill their demands only up to his status.  Sir, the opposition parties are encroaching on the land, they can pay the asking price, but the applicant is not in this condition. The Yogi government talks about taking action against the land mafia but it is not doing it.  Sir, is Lekhpal a legal practitioner who is giving wrong advice.  The opposition is clearly in possession of the land, tell me how the Divisional Magistrate will get the possession removed from them, is the possession of the land wrongly removed under section 116 of the revenue 2006?  It is clear from the report of the Lekhpal that the opposition is in possession of the entire land and they are not ready to leave the land, but here the Lekhpal is running away from telling why he is not leaving because it will reveal the truth.

श्रीमान जी लेखपाल महोदय की रिपोर्ट से स्पष्ट है कि कि प्रार्थी के पिता और विपक्षी गण दोनों ने उसी खाता संख्या से भूमि क्रय किया है किंतु विपक्षी द्वारा संपूर्ण भूमि पर कब्जा किया गया है अर्थात प्रार्थी के हिस्से की भी जमीन कब्जा कर लिया गया। श्रीमान जी प्रार्थी द्वारा यही स्पष्ट किया जा चुका है कि प्रार्थी के रूम के हिस्से का सीमांकन तहसील सदर द्वारा धारा 24 राजस्व संहिता 2006 के अंतर्गत किया जा चुका है। किंतु विपक्षी ने उस सीमांकन को मानने से इनकार कर दिया। श्रीमान जी सभी जानते हैं कि पुलिस और तहसील की कार्य शैली क्या है अब प्रार्थी तो अपने औकात तक ही उनकी मांगों को पूरा कर सकता है ‌। श्रीमान जी विपक्षी गण तो जमीन कब्जा कर रहे हैं वह मुंह मांगी कीमत दे सकते हैं किंतु प्रार्थी तो इस स्थिति में नहीं है । श्रीमान जी योगी सरकार भूमाफिया के विरुद्ध कार्यवाही करने की बात करती है किंतु कर तो नहीं रही है। श्रीमान जी क्या लेखपाल महोदय विधि वेता हैं जो गलत ढंग से सलाह दे रहे हैं। विपक्षी स्पष्ट रूप से जमीन का कब्जा किए हुए हैं बताइए  उपजिलाधिकारी महोदय उनसे किस तरह से कब्जा हटवाएंगे क्या 116 के तहत गलत ढंग से जमीन का कब्जा हटाया जाता है। लेखपाल महोदय के रिपोर्ट से स्पष्ट है की विपक्षी पूरे जमीन पर कब्जा है और वह जमीन छोड़ने के लिए तैयार नहीं है किंतु यहां पर लेखपाल महोदय यह बताने  से भाग रहे हैं कि वह क्यों नहीं छोड़ रहे है क्यों

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance Received   

Date of Action

04/02/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Prime Ministers Office

Officer Name

Mukul Dixit ,Under Secretary (Public)

Organisation name

Prime Ministers Office

Contact Address

Public Wing 5th Floor, Rail Bhawan New Delhi

Email Address

us-public.sb@gov.in

Contact Number

011-23386447

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2023/0005044

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Anil Kumar Maurya

Date of Receipt

05/01/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2022/0328545 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Anil Kumar Maurya Date of Receipt 12/12/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Prime Ministers OfficeIn the aforementioned matter, Tehsildar Sadar, District-Mirzapur submitted inconsistent and bogus report without adopting logistic approach in the matter. According to the report of Lekhpal, both complainant and opposition purchased the land, but opposition is grabbing the entire land. Both police and Tehsil requested grabbers but they denied the request. Undoubtedly, this report is the frustration of the Tehsil and they are escaping from the matter. Lekhpal is providing absurd suggestions to the complainant in the matter of land grabbing to file litigation under section 116 of revenue code 2006. This absurd suggestion came while the boundary of the land was decided under section 24 of revenue code 2006. Vide first page of the attached PDF document. 

लेखपाल की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक शिकायतकर्ता और विपक्ष दोनों ने जमीन खरीदी, लेकिन विपक्ष पूरी जमीन हड़प रहा है। पुलिस और तहसील दोनों ने कब्जा करने वालों से अनुरोध किया लेकिन उन्होंने अनुरोध को अस्वीकार कर दिया। निस्संदेह यह रिपोर्ट तहसील की हताशा है और वे मामले से बच रहे हैं। लेखपाल जमीन हड़पने के मामले में शिकायतकर्ता को राजस्व संहिता 2006 की धारा 116 के तहत मुकदमा दायर करने का बेतुका सुझाव दे रहा है।

यह बेतुका सुझाव तब आया जब राजस्व संहिता 2006 की धारा 24 के तहत भूमि की सीमा तय की  जा चुकी है। 

An application under article 51A of the constitution of India on behalf of my father Gulabdhar Maurya Son of late Amarnath Maurya resident of village and post Lohiya Talab district Mirzapur to make enquiry regarding the compliance of the endorsement order passed by the Honourable sub divisional magistrate Sadar Mirzapur 28 September 2021. This order was addressed to the station house officer Kotwali Katra district Mirzapur quite obvious from the second page of the attached documents.

It is quite obvious that one year and two months passed but no action was taken by the concerned to free the land of the applicant from the clutches of land mafia.

The applicant made the application under section 24 of the revenue code 2006 to decide the boundary of the land on the suggestion of the staff of the department of revenue tehsil Sadar and pai mise of the land was made by the concerned lekhpal but still no action taken by the department of revenue and police concerned to provide the possession of the land to the applicant so that fear of the land mafia may end.

On one side of the screen Yogi Adityanath sir is claiming to provide good governance but on the other side of a screen land mafia are hurling abuses to the applicant before the staff of the department of revenue and the police personnel. Whether it is the signal of the end of the terror of the Mafia in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Whether it indicates the control of the criminal activities in the Government of Uttar Pradesh.Sir, the second page of the attachment attached with this grievance is the complaint letter written by the father of the applicant Gulabdhar Maurya to the Divisional Magistrate Sada Mirzapur in PDF format and the third and fourth pages attached with this attachment are the details of the land attached by the applicant. There is a document from which it is clear that the claim of the applicant is completely confirmed, and the land mafia does not have any documents related to the land, if there are documents, then both Tehsil Sadar and Mirzapur police should present them in their report because there is no document, so in the eyes they will not submit any documents.

The most important fact is that the Lekhpal Rahul Jadaun, whose mobile number is 72370 18737, is himself a firm measurer and that firm measure has not yet been submitted by him to the Divisional Magistrate, due to which, according to him, there is delay because the Lekhpal They are very friendly and polite in conversation but the matter is pending since 1 year

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

04/02/2023

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित Akhya upload kar sewa me sadar agrasarit hai

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, click on link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post