Corruption matter concerning department of forest overlooked by the chief minister office shows rampant corruption in the working

 







Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/16772
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
04/04/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns the department of forest and anomalies found in the working of Divisional forest officer Gonda, Divisional forest officer G.B. Noida and divisional director social forestry division Lalitpur. This complaint is based on the report of Comptroller and Auditor General of India on economic sector and public sector undertakings for the year ended 31 March 2019.
Why the government of U.P. did not realise Rs.22.53 Crore from companies which were provided land of the forest on lease quite obvious from the A.G. report?
Description of Information Sought 1-PIO may provide the current status regarding the realisation of dues from the aforementioned lessee.

2-PIO may provide the action taken report by the office of principal chief conservator HOD as subsequent development after the report of A.G.

The matter concerns the Report of Comptroller and Auditor General of India on economic sector and public sector undertakings for the year ended 31 March 2019. Dedicated to truth in the public interest which means raised matter concerns wide public interest and a quest of principal accountant general. First I request to the public information officer to take a glance of the attached PDF document to this online R.T.I. application.

Divisional forest officer Gonda leased out land in December 2011 to Bajaj Hindustan Sugar Industries Limited which was approved by the Government of Uttar Pradesh in May 2012 covering area of leased out land 1.660 hectare and lease was executed for the years 25 years and this land was handed over to lessee in September 2013 and period for which lease rent had to levied and realised September 2013 to September 2019 i.e. 6 years consequently amount of the premium Rs.41.35 Lakhs and and amount lease rent Rs.32.18 Lakhs.

संभागीय/प्रभागीय वन अधिकारी गोंडा ने दिसंबर 2011 में बजाज हिंदुस्तान शुगर इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड को भूमि पट्टे पर दी थी जिसे मई 2012 में उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदित किया गया था जिसमें पट्टे पर दी गई भूमि का क्षेत्रफल 1.660 हेक्टेयर था और पट्टा 25 वर्षों के लिए निष्पादित किया गया था और यह भूमि सितंबर 2013 में पट्टेदार को सौंप दी गई थी और अवधि के लिए जिसका लीज रेंट सितंबर 2013 से सितंबर 2019 तक लगाया और वसूल किया गया था यानी 6 साल परिणामस्वरूप प्रीमियम की राशि 41.35 लाख और लीज रेंट की राशि 32.18 लाख रुपये

Divisional forest officer G.B. Noida leased out land in November 2015 to Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited which was approved by the Government of Uttar Pradesh in October 2016 covering area of leased out land 11.809 hectare and lease was executed for the years 25 years and this land was handed over to lessee in October 2016 and period for which lease rent had to levied and realised October 2016 to October 2019 i.e. 3 years consequently amount of the premium Rs.1643.22 Lakhs and and amount lease rent Rs.492.97 Lakhs.

A Similar case is of divisional director social forestry division Lalitpur.

Consequently, total Rs.22.53 Crore had to be levied and realised from the lessee till the submission of Audit report.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
01/07/2022
Remarks
अवलोकित
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the deep rooted corruption in the department of forest government of Uttar Pradesh and the chief minister office is saying that they have taken the perusal of the contents of the grievance and they did not reach an any conclusion and they are escaping from submitting the report on the public grievance portal showing that they are escaping from the matter of the deep rooted corruption which is most surprising and against the view points of chief minister Yogi Adityanath. How can it be justified to say on the public fora that I will promote transparency accountability in the working of public authorities but the factual position is that chief minister office itself supporting the corrupt activities of the subordinate ministries. The matter concerns the siphoning of millions of rupees is being overlooked by the office of the chief minister Yogi Adityanath how can it be justified?
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the deep rooted corruption in the department of forest government of Uttar Pradesh and the chief minister office is saying that they have taken the perusal of the contents of the grievance and they did not reach an any conclusion and they are escaping from submitting the report on the public grievance portal showing that they are escaping from the matter of the deep rooted corruption which is most surprising and against the view points of chief minister Yogi Adityanath. How can it be justified to say on the public fora that I will promote transparency accountability in the working of public authorities

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post