How can grievances of Sudarshan Maurya concerning arbitrariness of assistant labour commissioner may be forwarded to others?

 

D.M. Prayagraj said matter concerns District Mirzapur and now E.O. Municipality says it concerns Assistant Labour commissioner

Chief minister office forwarded matter concerning assistant labour commissioner Mirzapur to D.M. Prayagraj and disposed arbitrarily

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/40025

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sudarshan Maurya

Date of Receipt

09/06/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Whether a matter concerning deep irregularity can be bypassed on the flimsy ground that the matter is amenable before quasi-judicial court It is dead certain that the chief minister office has supervisory power over the function of the lower judiciary along with the administrative control of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and function of quasi-judicial staff comes under the ambit of the Government of Uttar Pradesh directly.

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/34767

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Sudarshan Maurya Date of Receipt 26/05/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh

श्री मान जी प्रार्थी के उपरोक्त शिकायत का निस्तारण इस आधार पर किया गया की प्रकरण का सम्बन्ध नगर पालिका परिषद् मिर्ज़ापुर शहर से नहीं है बल्कि इसका सम्बन्ध असिस्टेंट लेबर कमिश्नर मिर्ज़ापुर से है ०८ जून २०२२ के नगर पालिका परिषद् मिर्ज़ापुर शहर की आख्या को आधार बना कर प्रकरण निस्तारित मान लिया गया अर्थात प्रार्थी का शिकायत अभी भी तार्किक प्रेक्षण और निष्कर्ष से कोशों दूर है

श्री मान जी सुशासन की राह इतनी आसान नहीं है शब्द छोटा है किन्तु इसकी चाहत वही रख सकता है जो अद्वितीय हो कुछ लोगों के मुँह से सुशासन की बात सुनकर बहुत हास्यास्पद लगता है क्योकि जिनमे यह भी क्षमता नहीं है की उनकी व्यक्तिगत कार्यालय में उनके शब्दों के क्या महत्व है समझ सके

शिकायत संख्या:-60000220024134 1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 21-02-2022 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-प्रयागराज , 25-03-2022 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित 2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 24-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-प्रयागराज ,पुलिस 25-03-2022 प्रकरण का संबंध जनपद मिर्जापुर से है। निस्तारित For more details, vide attached document to the grievance.

Here an aggrieved applicant submitted a complaint against the arbitrary issue of notices to parties without considering the pros and cons of the matter and overlooking its jurisdiction consequently concerned assistant labour commissioner crossed the boundary of its powers delegated by the government. Which is subject to the government to keep its vigilant eyes over such lawlessness and anarchy and obligatory duty of the citizens to bring such matters to government. Government ought to order an inquiry which must be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner.

Object of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 The Payment of Wages Act regulates the payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in industry and its importance cannot be under-estimated. The Act guarantees payment of wages on time and without any deductions except those authorised under the Act.

The Act does not apply to persons whose wage is Rs. 24,000/- or more per month. The Act also provides to the effect that a worker cannot contract out of any right conferred upon him under the Act. This implies that Payment of Wages Act, 1936 deals with the dispute between employer and employees but not between a contractor and a common man who had given contract to construct house to contractor Yakoob Ansari S/O Siddik Mia who is plaintiff number 1 in the aforementioned plaint. Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia himself accepted in the complaint dated 07 June 2021 that he used to take contracts of the construction of houses. This implies that he is a contractor and others i.e. from plaintiff number 3 to 6 are the workers employed by contractor Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia.

Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is the defendant 1 served the notice to Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Mohammad Siddik Mia and his son Farook Ansari S/O Yakoob Ansari to pay detriment occurred to defendant Rs.803885.00 because of the dereliction of the contractor. Aforementioned still not compensated the loss but trying to deviate from real issue through aforementioned notice. Sir that executive officer municipality Mirzapur city submitted the aforementioned report under his sign on 09-09-2021 bearing letter number 210 , for more feedback, vide

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

09/06/2022

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350