Think about anarchy in judiciary, questionnaire of Dinesh Pratap Singh did not reach to concerned court despite order passed on 16 Oct 2019

 



Grievance Status for registration number: DEPOJ/E/2022/03173
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
17/04/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Justice
Grievance Description
An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh son of Angad Prasad Singh living at Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001, State-Uttar Pradesh Mobile number-9838919619.
Why did the application dated 13 October 2019 of Dinesh Pratap Singh not reach the concerned court despite the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow as ordered on 16 October 2019? Here this question arises: who overlooked the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow on 16 October 2019? More than two and half years have passed but the questionnaire sent by Dinesh Pratap Singh still has not reached the concerned court. Whether it is not reflecting deep rooted tyranny and arbitrariness in the working of the public authority district court Lucknow?
Grievance Status for registration number : DEPOJ/E/2019/04435 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 01/12/2019 Received By Ministry/Department Justice
Current Status Case Closed Date of Action 09/12/2019 Remarks The grievance has been forwarded to Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for action, as appropriate.
For more feedback, vide attached document to the grievance.
Most respectfully the applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Honourable Sir under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to the following submissions as follows.
1-First Honourable Sir may be apprised with the status of the case as follows.
Daily Status Chief Judicial Magistrate In the court of :A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29 CNR Number :UPLK040047752011 Case Number :Cri. Case/4003282/2011
State of Uttar Pradesh versus DINESH PRATAP SINGH Date : 21-03-2022 Business : c Next Purpose : Evidence
Next Hearing Date : 30-05-2022 A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29
2-Sir, open court hearing and independence of judiciary are two essential components of delivery of justice but where is open court hearing if application dated 13 October 2019 of Dinesh Pratap Singh has not reached the concerned court despite the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow as ordered on 16 October 2019. Whether independence of judiciary delegates the power to a judicial member to defy the suggestion as conveyed on 16 October 2019.
3-Where is accountability in judiciary if representation in the form of questionnaire of Dinesh Pratap Singh still not reached to the concerned court after more than two and half years. Surprisingly the court is collecting evidence and the defender has the right to keep its submissions at any stage of proceedings to overcome injustice made to him.
4- High court of judicature and apex court are court of records, then why is the concerned court running away from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad?.
The matter concerns the failure of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. When both administration and court overlooked the grievances concerned with the deep-rooted corruption, then in frustration, door of ministry of law and justice knocked. When Registrar general also overlooked the representation of the applicant forwarded by the ministry of justice, then think about the status of rule of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Please forward the matter to registrar general High court of judicature as reminder because to overlook the forwarded can never be in accordance with the framework of the constitution.
Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh ruthlessly expelled from his house by looting belongings of the house holds and other valuables by the opposite party in caucus with the police concerned by making the mockery of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High Court of judicature at Allahabad and slapping serious charges under aforementioned sections and many more others not only on the aggrieved applicant but also his wife who expired under trauma and daughter as well.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
17/04/2022
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Justice
Officer Name
Shri Niraj Kumar Gayagi (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Justice
Contact Address
Jaisalmer House, Mansingh Road, New Delhi
Email Address
jsst-doj@gov.in
Contact Number
01123385020
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. यदि ढाई साल से अधिक समय बीत जाने के बाद भी दिनेश प्रताप सिंह की प्रश्नावली के रूप में प्रतिनिधित्व संबंधित अदालत में नहीं पहुंचा तो न्यायपालिका में जवाबदेही कहां है। हैरानी की बात है कि अदालत सबूत इकट्ठा कर रही है और बचावकर्ता को अपने साथ हुए अन्याय को दूर करने के लिए कार्यवाही के किसी भी स्तर पर अपनी दलीलें रखने का अधिकार है। उच्च न्यायालय और सर्वोच्च न्यायालय अभिलेख न्यायालय हैं, तो संबंधित न्यायालय इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय की लखनऊ पीठ द्वारा पारित आदेश से क्यों भाग रहा है?

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post