If the information will not be made available by CPIOs after listing of second appeal




Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Whether it is not mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 that arbitrary replies are made under it?
1 message

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>1 October 2019 at 23:46
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, msrrbbnc@gmail.com, rrbbnc46@gmail.com

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to seek information from the 

To

                                  Chief Information Commissioner of India

                                The Central Information Commission,

                                            Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka,

                              New Delhi - 110 067

Appellant Yogi M. P. Singh, Mohalla-Surekapuram

Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001

                Versus

1-Central Public Information Officer, SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH

Phone: 080-23334147

rrbbnc46@gmail.com

2-First Appellate Authority 

B KASIVISWANATHAN

Phone: 080-23330378

rrbbnc46@gmail.com

Cryptic denial of sought Information was made available by CPIO after 67 days but no violation of provision for F.A.A. & F.A.A. blindly overlooked the arbitrary denial of sought information. 
Sought Information-
1-Matter concerned with railway recruitment Board Allahabad was processed by B. Kasiviswanathan, Chairman, Railway Recruitment board Bangalore in the attached grievance so please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. 2-Provide the duration would be taken by Railway recruitment board to refund the excess paid fee of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary as promised. 3-Provide posting and designation detail of staff who processed the attached grievance.
Reply of the CPIO -With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.

Decision of the FAA-With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the concerned grievance which is core issue to seek information. 

Grievance Status for registration number : MORLY/E/2019/06094

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant -Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt -24/04/2019

Received By Ministry/Department -Railways, ( Railway Board)

Grievance Description

An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India for the refund of paid fee as promised by the recruiting agency Railway Recruitment Board Allahabad.

The matter is concerned with the non-refund of the paid fee of the Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary whose registration number is 1381792722 and roll number is 132017084810275 and receipt of the examination hall is attached to the grievance.

Sir, a message was sent on the e-mail of the aggrieved aspirant Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary on 01 April 2019 at 46 minutes past 8 O clock in the evening.

Dear Candidate, Your Exam fee refund for CEN 02/2018 initiated by RRBs had failed due to incorrect bank details furnished by you in the application. You were given a one-time opportunity to correct your bank account details immediately through the Update Bank Account link provided on the official websites of RRBs. Detail is attached.

Subsequently, your applicant rectified IFSC code by substituting O by 0 and it is unfortunate that still, you have not refunded the paid fee as promised by the recruiting agency.

Again you may take a glance of the Bank detail as the scanned copy of passbook is attached to the grievance. I expect that no further excuse will be made by the concerned by taking the recourse of which poor aspirant may be deprived of its money which belongs to him.

Again account detail of the applicant is provided herewith so that no more confusion may arise at this juncture. Name of the account holder-KULDIP KUMAR CHAUDHARY Name of Father-RAMBABU CHAUDHARY IFSC Code-BARB0JABMIR and the account number is 10380100025087

Grievance Document  Current Status -Case closed

Date of Action -16/05/2019

Remarks -With reference to the above, it is advised that your “Refund of Examination Fee” on attending CBT for the post of Level -1 of 7th CPC of CEN 02/2018, is under process.

Rating-Poor

Rating Remarks

1-Matter concerned with railway recruitment Board Allahabad was processed by B. Kasiviswanathan, Chairman, Railway Recruitment board Bangalore in the attached grievance so please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. 2-Provide the duration would be taken by Railway recruitment board to refund the excess paid fee of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary as promised. 3-Provide posting and designation detail of staff who processed the attached grievance.

Officer Concerns To Officer Name -B. Kasiviswanathan Officer Designation -Chairman

Contact Address Railway Recruitment board/bangalore 18,Miller road Bangalore

Email Address rrbbnc@gmail.com Contact Number -08023333453 Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)  Reminder Date

Remarks-14/05/2019

Complaint was received by the concerned on 24/04/2019 but not redressed still which implies that concerned staffs of the public authority have no sympathy with the aggrieved student.Aggrieved student belongs to the oppressed class and those not interested to refund the paid fee committing criminal act of cheating so must be subjected to scrutiny under scheduled caste and scheduled tribes act.

 Pasted from <https://pgportal.gov.in/Status/Detail>

 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the online submitted online R.T.I. Communique.

Online RTI Request Form Details

 RTI Request Details :-

RTI Request Registration number

RRBBL/R/2019/80222

Public Authority

RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Name

Yogi M P Singh

Gender

Male

Address

Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur

Pincode

231001

Country

India

State

Uttar Pradesh

Status

Urban

Educational Status

Literate

Above Graduate

Phone Number

Details not provided

Mobile Number

+91-7379105911

Email-ID

yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship

Indian

Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?

No

(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

Description of Information Sought

1-Matter concerned with railway recruitment Board Allahabad was processed by B. Kasiviswanathan, Chairman, Railway Recruitment board Bangalore in the attached grievance so please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. 2-Provide the duration would be taken by Railway recruitment board to refund the excess paid fee of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary as promised. 3-Provide posting and designation detail of staff who processed the attached grievance.

Concerned CPIO

SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH

Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the R.T.I. Communique.

Online RTI Status Form

Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.

Enter Registration Number

RRBBL/R/2019/80222

Name

Yogi M P Singh

Date of filing

09/06/2019

Public Authority

RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore

Status

REQUEST DISPOSED OF

Date of action

16/08/2019

Reply :- With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.

CPIO Details :-

SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH

Phone: 080-23334147

rrbbnc46@gmail.com

First Appellate Authority Details :-

B KASIVISWANATHAN

Phone: 080-23330378

rrbbnc46@gmail.com

Nodal Officer Details :-

Telephone Number

08023334147

Email Id

msrrbbnc@gmail.com

Pasted from <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/status.php>

  4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is first appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

RTI Appeal Details :-

RTI Appeal Registration number

RRBBL/A/2019/60025

Public Authority

RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number

RRBBL/R/2019/80222

Request Registration Date

09/06/2019

Name

Yogi M P Singh

Gender

Male

Address

Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur

Pincode

231001

Country

India

State

Uttar Pradesh

Status

Urban

Educational Status

Literate

Above Graduate

Phone Number

Details not provided

Mobile Number

+91-7379105911

Email-ID

yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship

Indian

Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?

No

Ground For Appeal

No Response Within the Time Limit

CPIO of Public Authority approached

SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH

CPIO's Order/Decision Number

Details not provided

CPIO's Order/Decision Date

(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

Prayer or Relief Sought

Sir how can it be justified that CPIO violated the provision of Right to Information Act 2005 as under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005, he had to make available information within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the R.T.I. Communique. Here CPIO remained failed in complying the provisions of transparency act so action must be taken against him. Information sought must be provided to the appellant as soon as possible.

Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

Supporting document not provided

 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the aforementioned submitted online appeal.

Online RTI First Appeal Status Form

Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.

Enter Registration Number

RRBBL/A/2019/60025

Name

Yogi M P Singh

Date of filing

19/07/2019

Public Authority

RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore

Status

APPEAL DISPOSED OF

Date of action

01/10/2019

Reply :- With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.

Nodal Officer Details :-

Telephone Number

08023334147

Email Id

msrrbbnc@gmail.com

Pasted from <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/status.php>

This is a humble request of the applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                         
                                                                                                                             Yours sincerely
Date-01-10-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

1 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. FAA colluded with CPIO and information made available after two and half years which is worthless.
    Sir how can it be justified that CPIO violated the provision of Right to Information Act 2005 as under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005, he had to make available information within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the R.T.I. Communique. Here CPIO remained failed in complying the provisions of transparency act so action must be taken against him. Information sought must be provided to the appellant as soon as possible.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post