Token ID: Dept/HOMD/2021/19514Department : Home-PoliceStatus: Submitted Date: 28/09/2021Attachment
Plus-Minus
DocumentPDF
Your Grievance:
An application on behalf of Mahendra Kumar Maurya Address-Mahanth Ka Shivala, Hathiya fatak, Post-Putalighar, Mirzapur city, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001, Uttar Pradesh. On 03/02/2020, the applicant reminded in the grievance dated as Grievance Status for registration number : GOVMH/E/2019/05546 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 15/09/2019 Honourable sir your applicant knows only two languages first international language English and second mother tongue Hindi so he must not be sent those Communications which may be in Marathi regional language of the Maharashtra. Undoubtedly your applicant respects entire languages but what is the benefit if I cannot understand the Marathi so entire Communications may be made available either in Hindi language or in English. Section 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account. 1[Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provision of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 2[a term which may be extended to two years], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both. If the wrongdoings are committed under the law of the land then it is obligatory duty of the police that it may register a first information report in the matter so that justice may be available to the victim. Here the role of the police is cryptic instead of resolving the dispute by pursuing the appropriate path.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVMH/E/2021/05616
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
28/09/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Maharashtra
Grievance Description
An application on behalf of Mahendra Kumar Maurya Address-Mahanth Ka Shivala, Hathiya fatak, Post-Putalighar, Mirzapur city, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001, Uttar Pradesh.
On 03/02/2020, the applicant reminded in the grievance dated as Grievance Status for registration number : GOVMH/E/2019/05546
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt 15/09/2019 Honourable sir your applicant knows only two languages first international language English and second mother tongue Hindi so he must not be sent those Communications which may be in Marathi regional language of the Maharashtra. Undoubtedly your applicant respects entire languages but what is the benefit if I cannot understand the Marathi so entire Communications may be made available either in Hindi language or in English.
Section 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account.
1Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provision of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 2a term which may be extended to two years, or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both.
If the wrongdoings are committed under the law of the land then it is obligatory duty of the police that it may register a first information report in the matter so that justice may be available to the victim.
Here the role of the police is cryptic instead of resolving the dispute by pursuing the appropriate path. Police are playing a cryptic role by replying in the Marathi language which can not be understood by the representative of the aggrieved person as he does not understand Marathi.
How the police are justified in its act if the cheque provided by the person bounced in the the bank which means he has cheated the aggrived applicant Mahendra Kumar Maurya. If the accused person is genuine one then he had to provide the 30000 rupees latter on but he did not do so which means he deliberately cheated the poor complainant.
It is factual position that cheque of rupees 30000 provided by the transport company is bounced because of the lack of money in the bank account of the company which means company deliberately provided the check which is to be bounced otherwise they had to provide the 30,000 money letter by issuing the other check but not done by them.
Cheque Bounce is a criminal offence so it is obligatory duty of the police concerned to register First Information Report in the matter so that action may be taken against the wrongdoer Who cheated aggrieved individual.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
28/09/2021
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Maharashtra
Officer Name
Shri. J.J.Valvi
Officer Designation
Deputy Secretary.
Contact Address
Email Address
jana.valvi@nic.in
Contact Number
02222883286
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVMH/E/2021/03512
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
28/06/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Maharashtra
Grievance Description
Sir, the applicant knows only two languages which are Hindi and English and here they have said that action taken by the subordinate office but what action taken by the subordinate office I could not understand as its script was in Marathi and applicant does not know the Marathi language, They did not take any action and misled the applicant by writing voluminous papers in Marathi which applicant could not understand. They may provide the report either in English or Hindi so that applicants may submit counter submissions. It is a fact that the Maharashtra government lacks multilinguist officers or most of the government officers are corrupt. As matter of fact concerns the bounce of the cheque but they put the carpet on the entire matter and shielded the wrongdoers. Grievance Status for registration number : GOVMH/E/2019/05546
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 15/09/2019
Received By Ministry/Department Maharashtra
Grievance Description
An application on behalf of Mahendra Kumar Maurya who was cheated by Proprietor H.K.G.N. Transport, Transport, Contractor and commission agent, In front of collector office, Amgaon Road, Fulchur, Gondia PIN Code-441601 Maharashtra. Mobile numbers-9850426073,8554065890, 8378817635.To
District Magistrate And District Collector Gondia
District-Gondia Province-Maharashtra , India
Subject-Aforementioned company is operating its business illegally by opening the office in the Gondia district of Maharashtra so it is obligatory duty of the District Magistrate concerned to be instrumental in providing justice to aggrieved applicant Mahendra Kumar Maurya. Concerned police may be directed to lodge F.I.R. of cheque bounce and latter also not received the notice served under section 138 negotiable instrument act 138 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account by the aggrieved applicant Mahendra Kumar Maurya. Vide attached documents in P.D.F. form to the grievance.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
01/07/2021
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Dr. Madhav Veer
Officer Designation
JOINT SECRETARY
Contact Address
Email Address
Dysec4@maharshtra.gov.in
Contact Number
02222850919
Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)
Reminder Date
Remarks
24/07/2021
Sir, already there is undue delay on the part of the transport company so in the interest justice, process of enquiry may be accelerated for speedy disposal of the matter. Justice delayed is justice denied must be taken into consideration. Undoubtedly due care must be paid to matter as such cases of cheating is blot on the image of our society which is not only bilateral matter but an offence to society. Credibility of our society is going down because of such wrongdoers.
On 03/02/2020, the applicant reminded in the grievance dated as Grievance Status for registration number: GOVMH/E/2019/05546
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt 15/09/2019 Honourable sir your applicant knows only two languages first international language English and second mother tongue Hindi so he must not be sent those Communications which may be in Marathi regional language of the Maharashtra. Undoubtedly your applicant respects entire languages but what is the benefit if we can not cannot understand the Marathi so entire Communications may be made available either in Hindi language or in English.
16/08/2021
Sir, the matter concerns the procrastination by the concerned police in registering the first information report because of the the corruption in the department concerned. The notice against them under the negotiable instrument act has been served to them by the aggrieved applicant but they did not accept the notice and returned it which is showing that they are not pursuing the path of the law of land.
Section 7. Optional use of Hindi or other official language in judgments, etc., of High Courts.
As from the appointed day or any day thereafter the Governor of a State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorise the use of Hindi or the official language of the State, in addition to the English language, for the purposes of any judgment, decree or order passed or made by the High Court for that State and where any judgment, decree or order is passed or made in any such language (other than the English language), it shall be accompanied by a translation of the same in the English language issued under the authority of the High Court.
Fanaticism is not good: Madras HC asks Centre to avoid Hindi when communication initiated in English
A recent order, passed by the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court, said, "The Union government must reply in English if it is getting representation in English."
Any kind of fanaticism is not good for any society," said the Madras High Court while pulling up the Union government for replying to a Madurai MP in Hindi when the latter had sent a letter in English.
Any kind of fanaticism is not good for any society," said the Madras High Court while pulling up the Union government for replying to a Madurai MP in Hindi when the latter had sent a letter in English.
ADVERTISING
In a recent order, the Madras High Court said, "The Union government must reply in English if it is getting representation in English."
The order was passed by the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court involving Justices N Kirubakaran (Retired) and M Duraiswamy. The bench issued the order while hearing a case filed by MP Su Venkatesan, a leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Tamil Nadu.
Madurai MP Su Venkatesan had approached the court after he got a response from the Ministry of Home Affairs in Hindi to a letter he had sent in English.
Venkatesan first wrote to the ministry officials stating that he is not from a Hindi-speaking state and therefore, he does not know to read, write or speak Hindi.
Later, the MP approached the court demanding that English be used in all communications between the Union and the Tamil Nadu government, its lawmakers and the people.
WHAT THE MADRAS HC COURT SAID
Addressing the Centre while responding to Venkatesan's appeal, the Madras High Court said, "Any kind of fanaticism is not good for any society. Fanaticism, in any form, is to be condemned, if it is exhibited. Linguistic fanaticism is more dangerous as it would give an impression that one language alone is superior and being imposed upon the people speaking different languages."
"One could understand the information and expression only in the known languages. When a right is given under Article 19 (1) of the Constitution regarding freedom to write and freedom of expression, it is the duty of the Central Government to use English," the court said.
"[The] central government is dutybound to follow the provisions of the official languages Act. Once a representation is given in English, it is the duty of the Union government to give a reply in English only which will also be in consonance with the statute, viz., the Official Languages Act."
Section 3. Continuance of English language for official purposes of the Union and for use in Parliament.
1[3. Continuance of English language for official purposes of the Union and for use in Parliament.— (1) Notwithstanding the expiration of the period of fifteen years from the commencement of the Constitution, the English language may, as from the appointed day, continue to be used, in addition to Hindi,—
(a) for all the official purposes of the Union for which it was being used immediately before that day; and
(b) for the transaction of business in Parliament:
Provided that the English language shall be used for purposes of communication between the Union and a State which has not adopted Hindi as its official language:
Provided further that where Hindi is used for purposes of communication between one State which has adopted Hindi as its official language and another State which has not adopted Hindi as its official language, such communication in Hindi shall be accompanied by a translation of the same in the English language:
Provided also that nothing in this sub-section shall be construed as preventing a State which has not adopted Hindi as its official language from using Hindi for purposes of communication with the Union or with a State which has adopted Hindi as its official language, or by agreement with any other State, and in such a case, it shall not be obligatory to use the English language for purposes of communication with that State.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where Hindi or the English language is used for purposes of communication—
(i) between one Ministry or Department or office of the Central Government and another;
(ii) between one Ministry or Department or office of the Central Government and any corporation or company owned or controlled by the Central Government or any office thereof;
(iii) between any corporation or company owned or controlled by the Central Government or any office thereof and another,
a translation of such communication in the English language or, as the case may be, in Hindi shall also be provided till such date as the staff of the concerned Ministry, Department, office or corporation or company aforesaid have acquired a working knowledge of Hindi.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), both Hindi and the English language shall be used for—
(i) resolutions, general orders, rules, notifications, administrative or other reports or press communiques issued or made by the Central Government or by a Ministry, Department or office thereof or by a corporation or company owned or controlled by the Central Government or by any office of such corporation or company;
(ii) administrative and other reports and official papers laid before a House or the Houses of Parliament;
(iii) contracts and agreements executed, and licences, permits, notices and forms of tender issued, by or on behalf of the Central Government or any Ministry, Department or office thereof or by a corporation or company owned or controlled by the Central Government or by any office of such corporation or company.
(4) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3), the Central Government may, by rules made under section 8, provide for the language or languages to be used for the official purpose of the Union, including the working of any Ministry, Department, section or office, and in making such rules, due consideration shall be given to the quick and efficient disposal of the official business and the interests of the general public and in particular, the rules so made shall ensure that persons serving in connection with the affairs of the Union and having proficiency either in Hindi or in the English language may function effectively and that they are not placed at a disadvantage on the ground that they do not have proficiency in both the languages.
(5) The provisions of clause (a) of sub-section (1), and the provisions of sub-section (2), sub-section (3) and sub-section (4) shall remain in force until resolutions for the discontinuance of the use of the English language for the purposes mentioned therein have been passed by the Legislatures of all the States which have not adopted Hindi as their official language and until after considering the resolutions aforesaid, a resolution for such discontinuance has been passed by each House of Parliament.]
Tags:
Corruption
ReplyDeleteSir, already there is undue delay on the part of the transport company so in the interest justice, process of enquiry may be accelerated for speedy disposal of the matter. Justice delayed is justice denied must be taken into consideration. Undoubtedly due care must be paid to matter as such cases of cheating is blot on the image of our society which is not only bilateral matter but an offence to society. Credibility of our society is going down because of such wrongdoers.