Matter concerns mismanagement and corruption of Uttar Pradesh state information commission unfortunately disposed of illegally

 


संदर्भ संख्या : 60000210110527 , दिनांक - 12 Aug 2021 तक की स्थिति


आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :


शिकायत संख्या:-60000210110527


आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Instead of show of, we must take genuine steps to curb the steep hike in growing corruption. An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice, but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution? Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission. Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal. The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows. 1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020. 2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020. 3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter. Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively. 1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation. 2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation. 3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission. But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter. Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach, betterment to society.


विभाग -शिकायत श्रेणी -


नियोजित तारीख-10-08-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-


स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिलाधिकारी


प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-


प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक12-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-महोदय जब प्रकरण राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश से है तो और खुद मंडी समित चौकी इंचार्ज बाली मौर्या ने भी अपने अपने रिपोर्ट में कहा है और उसी रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शिकायत को बंद कर दिए जब  खुद हिंदी  में लिखे  है की आवेदक आवेदक द्वारा राज्य सूचना आयोग के कुप्रबंधन और भ्र्ष्टाचार की शिकायत प्रार्थी द्वारा किया गया है इसलिए प्रार्थना पत्र का निस्तारण राज्य सूचना आयोग के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा कराया जाना समीचीन होगा और हास्यास्पद यह  है की आप द्वारा द्वारा इस रिपोर्ट को आधार बना कर शिकायत  निस्तारित  लिया गया  जो की भ्रष्टाचार को पोषित करने वाला है कृपया भूल का परिमार्जन करे 


फीडबैक की स्थिति -फीडबैक प्राप्त


संलग्नक देखें -Click here


नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!


अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :


क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक


1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 26-07-2021 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर, 10-08-2021 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित


2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 26-07-2021 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 10-08-2021 महोदय, जांच आख्या संलग्न कर सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित


3 आख्या वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक (पुलिस ) 26-07-2021 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी , नगर ,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर 10-08-2021 महोदय , जांच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है । निस्तारित


4 आख्या क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त (पुलिस ) 28-07-2021 पृष्ठांकित कृपया आख्या 05 दिवस मे प्रेेषित करना सुनिश्चित करे, प्रकऱण निस्तारण समय से न होने की दशा मे प्र0नि0 व सम्बन्धित जांच कर्ता का उत्तरदायित्व होगा । थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक-कोतवाली कटरा,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 09-08-2021 आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/34607

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M P Singh

Date of Receipt

14/07/2021

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Instead of show of, we must take genuine steps to curb the steep hike in growing corruption.


An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice, but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution?

Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.

Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal.

The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows.


1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.


2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.


3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter.


Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively.


1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation.


2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation.


3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission.


But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter.


Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach, betterment to society.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

11/08/2021

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित महोदय, जांच आख्या संलग्न कर सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है महोदय , जांच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

How can it be justified that the matter concerns the Uttar Pradesh state information commission and chauki in-charge stated in its report but concerned staffs disposed How can it be justified that Uttar Pradesh state information commission may return the appeal of the appellant arbitrarily on the false and fabricated ground which is quite obvious from the post and most surprising is that they are submitting arbitrary reply to the grievances forwarded to them and most surprising is that a government itself showing a lackadaisical approach to redress the grievances. Our motive to introduce the right to Information act 2005 was to promote transparency and accountability in the public offices but it seems that because of corruption our public functionaries are failed to implement The Right to Information act 2005 properly which is the root cause wrongdoer Public Information officers are not being punished Under The Right to Information act 2005 and no information is being made available.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey

Officer Designation

Joint Secretary

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

2226350