Sarita Singh submitted grievance before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission against laxity of police of VIP parliamentary seat

 



nhrc.india@nic.in via nic.in 

3:24 PM (24 minutes ago)

to me


Your complaint has been received in HRC Net portal vide 

diary No. 1780/IN/2021

HRCNet Team,NHRC







Registration Number SSPVN/R/2021/60028

Name Sarita Singh

Date of Filing 29/06/2021

Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 30/06/2021

Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9454401638, Email Id:- co-bhelupur.va@up.gov.in

Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454401644

Email-ID

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE VARANASI

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SSPVN/R/2021/60028

Date of Filing 29/06/2021

* Name Sarita Singh

Gender Female

* Address Flat number 11 , Jail Road Shivpur, Jail Road Shivpur

Pincode 221010

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Pincode Details not provided

Phone Number +91-7309711847

Mobile Number +91-7309711847

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought The matter concerns the I.G.R.S. -92119700000597, office of circle officer, Bhelupur, Varanasi, date of application-01/03/2021, complaint received from CM-H.  Name of the applicant - Sarita Singh, D/O Shankar Lal Singh, Address- Block  number-69, flat number- 11, Indrapur colony, Jail Road, police station- Shivpur, Mobile number-7309711847Name of opposition- Hritik Ranjan S/O Rajnath,  Address- New colony, ward number-25 District- Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh Brief description of complaint- Opposition denied marrying even after live in relationship. According to representation of the aggrieved applicant dated 03/03/2021, Litigation crime number- 203/2021 under I.P.C. section 376 and 406 registered against the opposition in police station- Lanka. Its investigation is being performed by sub-inspector Pradeep Kumar. Circle officer directed in-charge police station Lanka for speedy investigation.PIO may provide following information. 1-Please provide the copy of medical examination report of the victim. 2- Please provide the action in the matter concerned. 3-Two sections of the IPC is imposed on  accused Hritik Ranjan section 376 and 406 of the IPC as he and his family is not cooperating enquiry and not appearing before competent officers so need to take vigilant eyes on them. Please provide the information regarding the non arrest of accused Hritik Ranjan.4-Undoubtedly it may be Lanka police may not have sent the requisite information but when concerned officers have sought information from aggrieved then it is their obligation to take him under custody but Hritik Ranjan still hatches conspiracy against the information seeker knowingly not supporting Lanka police in the investigation. Please provide the reason for not arresting the accused.

* Concerned PIO CHAKRAPANI TRIPATHI - CO BHELUPUR

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

संदर्भ संख्या : 40019721013776 , दिनांक - 12 Jul 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40019721013776

आवेदक का नाम-Sarita Singhविषय-An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to seek justice for a vulnerable girl raped by luring in the name of marriage and making enquiry regarding the progress of investigation being carried out by the Sub inspector Pradeep Kumar adopting a reluctant approach to the matter. The matter concerns an adolescent girl in which no action was taken by the concerned police because of the corruption. Maximum time to complete an investigation in most complicated cases is six months but the police have forgotten their duty. Herein this matter senior rank officer having supervisory authority over Lanka police station directed for the speedy investigation but outcome remained zero because of rampant corruption and tyranny.  The matter concerns with Varanasi police which is the parliamentary constituency of our great Prime Minister Mr Narendra Damodar Modi who is known as most honest Prime Minister of this country but position is that rape victims are are attempting suicide in this religious City of the government of Uttar Pradesh whether it is justified? Description of Information Sought The matter concerns the I.G.R.S. -92119700000597, office of circle officer, Bhelupur, Varanasi, date of application-01/03/2021, complaint received from CM-H.  Name of the applicant - Sarita Singh, D/O Shankar Lal Singh, Address- Block  number-69, flat number- 11, Indrapur colony, Jail Road, police station- Shivpur, Mobile number-7309711847Name of opposition- Hritik Ranjan S/O Rajnath,  Address- New colony, ward number-25 District- Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh Brief description of complaint- Opposition denied marrying even after live in relationship. According to representation of the aggrieved applicant dated 03/03/2021, Litigation crime number- 203/2021 under I.P.C. section 376 and 406 registered against the opposition in police station- Lanka. Its investigation is being performed by sub-inspector Pradeep Kumar. Circle officer directed in-charge police station Lanka for speedy investigation. 

PIO may provide following information. 

1-Please provide the copy of the medical examination report of the victim. 

2- Please provide the action in the matter concerned.  

3-Two sections of the IPC is imposed on  accused Hritik Ranjan section 376 and 406 of the IPC as he and his family is not cooperating enquiry and not appearing before competent officers so need to take vigilant eyes on them. Please provide the information regarding the non arrest of accused Hritik Ranjan. 

4-Undoubtedly it may be Lanka police may not have sent the requisite information but when concerned officers have sought information from aggrieved then it is their obligation to take him under custody but Hritik Ranjan still hatches conspiracy against the information seeker knowingly not supporting Lanka police in the investigation. Please provide the reason for not arresting the accused.

विभाग -पुलिसशिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-03-08-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -क्षेत्राधिकारी स्तरपद -क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अग्रसारित विवरण :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी प्राप्त/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 04-07-2021 03-08-2021 क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी भेलुपुर,जनपद-वाराणसी,पुलिस कार्यालय स्तर पर लंबित

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

6 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. Two sections of the IPC is imposed on accused Hritik Ranjan section 376 and 406 of the IPC as he and his family is not cooperating enquiry and not appearing before competent officers so need to take vigilant eyes on them. Please provide the information regarding the non arrest of accused Hritik Ranjan.

    अग्रसारित विवरण :

    क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी प्राप्त/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति


    1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 04-07-2021 03-08-2021 क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी भेलुपुर,जनपद-वाराणसी,पुलिस कार्यालय स्तर पर लंबित

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the justice is available to the the women and girls in the VIP constituency or you can say that parliamentary seat of our prime minister Narendra Damodar Modi then why this justice is not available to the Sarita Singh who is knocking entire doors available to her? Undoubtedly constitutional offices available in this largest democracy in the world have been handicapped because of the rampant corruption in the public offices.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If the justice is not available in the constituency of our prime minister Narendra Modi Sir then think about the the remote districts of the state of Uttar Pradesh.
    The maximum time to investigate the matter is 6 months and already more than three months spent by the investigation officer and did not proceed even a single step in the matter which means concerned investigation officer is adopting lackadaisical approach in the matter and this laxity is because of corruption in the department.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Varanasi is the VIP constituency As it is the parliamentary seat of Narendra Modi sir who is the prime minister of this country and when the justice to the women and girls is not available in this VIP constituency then think about the other districts of the Government of Uttar Pradesh.
    Now matter has been reported to the the State human rights commission and we have to wait and watch what action is being taken by the human rights watch dog of this country?

    ReplyDelete
  5. India is a member country of the United Nations Organisation so it must respect the the human rights of of each individual but not doing so which means it is not pursuing the obligatory laws Binding on the member countries.
    Woman Sarita Singh belongs to the Varanasi parliamentary constituency which belongs to the Prime Minister Narendra Modi Sir and still she is deprived of the justice because of the rampant corruption in the department of the police even when she has knocked entire doors of seeking justice.

    ReplyDelete
  6. COMPLAINT / CASE STATUS
    COMPLAINT / CASE STATUS
    SHRC, Uttar Pradesh
    Case Details
    HRCNet HRCNet HRCNet

    Diary No 1780/IN/2021 Case / File No 2278/24/72/2021
    Victim Name SARITA SINGH Registration Date 14/07/2021
    Action List (Click on Action given in blue color to view details)
    No action taken yet
    Expand All Action List
    Complaint
    Diary No 1780/IN/2021 Section M-1
    Language ENGLISH Mode BY INTERNET
    Received Date 12/07/2021 Complaint Date 12/07/2021
    Victim
    Victim Name SARITA SINGH Gender Female
    Religion Unknown Cast Unknown
    Address BLOCK NUMBER-69, FLAT NUMBER- 11, INDRAPUR COLONY, JAIL ROAD, POLICE STATION- SHIVPUR,
    District VARANASI State UTTAR PRADESH
    HRCNet HRCNet HRCNet
    Complainant
    Name SARITA SINGH
    Address BLOCK NUMBER-69, FLAT NUMBER- 11, INDRAPUR COLONY, JAIL ROAD, POLICE STATION- SHIVPUR,
    District VARANASI State UTTAR PRADESH ( 221010 )
    Incident
    Incident Place PROCRASTINATION BY POLICE Incident Date 01/03/2021
    Incident Category VICTIMISATION
    Incident District VARANASI Incident State UTTAR PRADESH
    Incident Details

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post