Monday, January 23, 2023

To be honest and acting of honesty both are different which is root cause N.H.R.C. is justifying denial of information to Yogi M.P. Singh



Report of public authorities must be uploaded on NHRC website so that it must be accessible to aggrieved parties and corrupt dealings will be less 

Enter Registration Number NHRCM/A/E/22/00140

Name Yogi M P Singh

Received Date 23/12/2022

Public Authority National Human Rights Commission

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF

Date of action 23/01/2023

Reply :- is being disposed of

View Document

First Appellate Authority Details :- Indrajeet Kumar

Phone: 24663276

dr1[dot]nhrc[at]nic[dot]in

Nodal Officer Details :-

Telephone Number 24663285

Email Id ar1[dot]nhrc[at]nic[dot]in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details
RTI Appeal Details :-
   
RTI Appeal Registration number NHRCM/A/E/22/00140
Public Authority National Human Rights Commission
   
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number NHRCM/R/E/22/00670
Request Registration Date 23/08/2022
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Surekapuram colony , Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur city
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
  Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
CPIO of Public Authority approached Kamal Kishore (M-1 Section)
CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided
CPIO's Order/Decision Date
(Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)
Prayer or Relief Sought
Here appellant sought information from CPIO to provide a copy of enquiry report which ought to be uploaded in the case so that parties may access it but CPIO by taking recourse of office memo of DOPT denied information to the information seeker.
Now enquiry report is available to information seeker which is a concocted story consequently it was denied to appellant.
How will the protection of human rights be ensured if there is no transparency and accountability in the dealings of the public authority bearing responsibility to protect human rights in the country?

Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)