On 1 Jan 2020, UPSIC imposed penalty of Rs.25000 but not recovered from concerned secretary now his plea is registered for revocation
Registration Number DMOBD/A/2021/60012
Name Hariom Ojha
Date of Filing 26/06/2021
Status FIRST APPEAL APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT as on 27/01/2023
Remarks :- इस कार्यालय के पत्र संख्या 20/राजस्व सहायक/2023 दिनांक 27/01/2023 के क्रम में तहसीलदार ज्ञानपुर जनपद भदोही को प्रेषित किया गया है वांछित सूचना उलेखित अधिकारी से प्राप्त करे
Nodal Officer Details
Name SAILENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
Telephone Number 9454417639
Email-ID admfr.sr-up@gov.in
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE BHADOHI
Personal Details:-
* Name Hariom Ojha
Gender Male
* Address Village Ojhapur , Block Deegh, Tahsil Gyanpur
Pincode 221310
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-8009143310
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number DMOBD/A/2021/60012
Date of Filing 26/06/2021
Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Here date of submitting the R.T.I. Communique is 16/03/2021 and today is 26/06/2021 and this communique is not forwarded by the office of the district magistrate Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi to the concerned. Sir, public information officer concerned must provide within time as stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7 but unfortunately he remained failed. According to the aforementioned provision of Right Information Act 2005, a public information officer has to provide information within the stipulated time of 30 day. This 30 days is counted from the date of receipt of RTI Communique in the office of public authority. Without any doubt, Public Information Officer failed to provide information and did not communicate the reason for not providing information. Action must be taken against the PIO concerned for still not providing information. Violation of provisions of transparency act by the PIO can not be overlooked by the senior rank officer who will entertain this first appeal. Whether it is not a mockery of the law of land and showing the complete lawlessness and anarchy in the government machinery in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Right to Information act 2005 was brought of to promote transparency and accountability in the public offices but it seems that because of corruption its benefits are not reaching to the citizens of this country moreover its provisions are being diluted again and again and by the corrupt public functionaries in this largest democracy in the world which is the outcome of this non-constructive approach and procrastination in providing the information by the Public Information Officers.
Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number DMOBD/R/2021/60009
Date of Filing 16/03/2021
PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
Designation Details not provided
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date