UPPCL is procrastinating to compensate Dayanand Singh in electrical accident, report of Tehsil Sadar is defective, but they are not intimated



 

संदर्भ संख्या : 40019922028279, दिनांक - 22 Dec 2022 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40019922028279

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Think about the gravity of the situation that according to page 2 and 3 of attached PDF documents, which are arbitrary reports of Executive Engineer EDD II, A.K. Singh in which he is pressuring aggrieved Dayanad Singh to ask Tehsildar Sadar to resubmit recommendation by rectifying it which is illegal because aggrieved has no such power to ask Tehsildar Sadar. From the first page it is obvious that Lekhpal submitted its report on 15062021 and it was forwarded by revenue inspector on 1906.2021 for sanction and then the entire report sent by Tehsil Sadar to Executive Engineer EDD II, A.K. Singh. According to the rule of land, if the report of Tehsil Sadar is not conforming to the setup norms then it must be returned to them for rectification.  शिकायत संख्या -40019922027912 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण शिकायत संख्या -40019922027555 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय- Sir, Executive Engineer Power Distribution Division II AK Singh is complicating the case by giving a roundabout answer. The applicant only says that the Tehsildar Sadar has presented his report but the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II has found loopholes in it and is yet to compensate the victim. They are running away from providing the compensation to the victim, which is illegal, unjust, unconstitutional as far as the removal of objections are concerned, the objections which have been said to be removed in that report can be removed only by the person who has presented that report. The working style of the engineer is full of corruption and unconstitutional. Whatever he is saying is not according to the rules, He is saying for the new report but the report has already been prepared, only its shortcomings have to be removed and Dayanand Singh son of Shobh Nath Singh will not remove those shortcomings, Tehsildar Sadar and sab divisional Magistrate Sadar may remove the errors. Sir, if Tehsil Sadar has presented his report then only Tehsil Sadar will remove the shortcomings in it, but this simple thing is beyond the understanding of AK Singh, engineer of power distribution division second. A. K. Singh is not able to understand the simple fact that the report belongs to tahsil Sadar so IT will be rectified by the tehsil Sadar. Truth is that he does not have the courage to talk properly because the wrong person always runs away from the right thing., Think that the crop worth of Rs 50000 was burnt to ashes. Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, due to whose lacunae crop has been burnt, is running away from giving compensation by creating baseless facts, is this called good governance, where rights of the people are only violated, which human rights are protected here? Nothing is visible except corruption. Today, the report which is in a hurry apparently shown by executive Engineer distribution division second, was pending in his office for more than 1 and half years. When the request was made by the applicant, Dayanand Singh then this deficiency was deliberately created by them. It is true that these people are running away from paying compensation, otherwise the assessment of damages has been done by Tehsil Sadar quite obvious from the attached document to the grievance. श्रीमान जी अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय एके सिंह प्रकरण को गोल मटोल जवाब देकर जटिल बना रहे हैं प्रार्थी का सिर्फ यह कहना है कि तहसीलदार सदर अपनी आख्या प्रस्तुत कर चुके हैं किंतु अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय उसमें कमियां निकाल कर पीड़ित को

Department -विद्युतComplaint Category -

नियोजित तारीख-27-12-2022शिकायत की स्थिति-

Level -जनपद स्तरPost -अधिशासी अभियन्‍ता,विघुत

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक22-12-2022 को फीडबैक:-Honesty always rewards a man. I again repeat it that to say that someone is honest he may not be honest because honesty must reflect in his working style. The applicant is an anti corruption crusader his sole motive is tu reform the system. Still, executive Engineer electricity distribution division second is running away from the core issue. Executive Engineer is so honest that he does not use to entertain single application submitted under right to information act 2005. श्रीमान जी क्या अधिशासी अभियंता प्रार्थी को यह बताएंगे कि दयानंद सिंह किस तरह से उन अभिलेखों को शुद्ध करा सकते हैं जोकि उन्होंने अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय को नहीं भेजा है वे सभी अभिलेख तहसील सदर द्वारा अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय के सेवा में प्रेषित किए गए हैं। श्रीमान जी यदि वे दस्तावेज नियमानुसार नहीं है तो नियम के अनुसार अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय उन सभी दस्तावेजों को तहसील सदर को वापस कर दे तथा उसकी एक प्रतिलिपि प्रार्थी को प्रेषित कर दें अर्थात दयानंद सिंह पुत्र सोभनाथ सिंह को प्रेषित कर दें जिससे अग्रिम कार्यवाही हो सके। श्रीमान जी तहसील सदर द्वारा प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट यदि पूर्ण है तो उसका शुद्धिकरण भी तहसील सदर द्वारा ही किया जाएगा न कि प्रार्थी द्वारा । श्रीमान जी यदि अधिशासी अभियंता वास्तव में ईमानदार हैं तो यह बताएं कि वह डेढ़ वर्षो से क्या कर रहे थे इस विलंब का कारण क्या है किंतु यह सब नहीं बताएंगे। श्रीमान जी अधिशासी अभियंता प्रार्थी को यह भी बताएं की उन्होंने दयानंद सिंह पुत्र शोभनाथ सिंह को तहसीलदार सदर द्वारा प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट को शुद्ध करने हेतु क्यों आमंत्रित किया। श्रीमान जी क्या अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय की कार्यशैली रहस्य पूर्ण नहीं है अगर वे सभी चीजों को पारदर्शी तरीके से स्पष्ट नहीं करते हैं तो। श्रीमान जी प्रार्थी का आरोप अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय की कार्यशैली है वे अपनी कार्यशैली सुधारें। Sir, will the Executive Engineer tell the applicant that how Dayanand Singh can get those records rectified which he has not sent to Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II, all those records sent by Tehsil Sadar to the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II . Sir, if those documents are not according to the rules, then according to the rules, the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution division II, should return all those documents to Tehsil Sadar and send a copy of it to the applicant, i.e. send it to Dayanand Singh son of Sobhnath Singh, so that further action could be taken. May be Sir, if the report submitted by Tehsil Sadar is incorrect, then its correction will also be done by Tehsil Sadar only and not by the applicant. Sir, if the Executive Engineer is really honest, then tell what he was doing for one and a half years, what is the reason for this delay, but he will not tell all this. Mr. Executive Engineer also tell the applicant why he invited Dayanand Singh son of Shobhnath Singh to correct the report submitted by Tehsildar Sadar. Sir, is it the working style of Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II full of mystery if they do not explain everything in a transparent manner then the allegations are automatically proved. The allegation of the applicant is based on the working style of Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Section II, he should improve his working style.

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी अग्रसारित दिनांक आदेश आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति आपत्ति देखे संलगनक

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 20-12-2022 अधिशासी अभियन्‍ता,विघुत-मिर्ज़ापुर,विद्युत 21-12-2022 On line complaint no 40019922028179 is disposed निस्तारित


संदर्भ संख्या : 40019922027912 , दिनांक - 22 Dec 2022 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40019922027912

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण शिकायत संख्या -40019922027555 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय- Sir, Executive Engineer Power Distribution Division II AK Singh is complicating the case by giving a roundabout answer. The applicant only says that the Tehsildar Sadar has presented his report but the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II has found loopholes in it and is yet to compensate the victim. They are running away from providing the compensation to the victim which is illegal, unjust, unconstitutional as far as the removal of objections are concerned, the objections which have been said to be removed in that report can be removed only by the person who has presented that report. The working style of the engineer is full of corruption and unconstitutional. Whatever he is saying is not according to the rules, He is saying for the new report but the report has already been prepared, only its shortcomings have to be removed and Dayanand Singh son of Sobhnath Singh will not remove those shortcomings, Tehsildar Sadar and sab divisional Magistrate Sadar may remove the errors. Sir, if Tehsil Sadar has presented his report then only Tehsil Sadar will remove the shortcomings in it, but this simple thing is beyond the understanding of AK Singh, engineer of power distribution division second. A. K. Singh is not able to understand the simple fact that report belongs tu tahsil Sadar so IT will be rectified by the tahsil Sadar. Truth is that he does not have the courage to talk properly because the wrong person always runs away from the right thing., Think that the crop worth of Rs 50000 was burnt to ashes. Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, due to whose lacunae crop has been burnt, is running away from giving compensation by creating baseless facts, is this called good governance, where rights of the people are only violated, which human rights are protected here? Nothing is visible except corruption. Today, the report which is in a hurry apparently shown by executive Engineer distribut distribution division second, was pending in his office for more than 1 and half years. When the request was made by the applicant, Dayanand Singh then this deficiency was deliberately created by them. It is true that these people are running away from paying compensation, otherwise the assessment of damages has been done by Tehsil Sadar quite obvious from the attached document to the grievance. श्रीमान जी अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय एके सिंह प्रकरण को गोल मटोल जवाब देकर जटिल बना रहे हैं प्रार्थी का सिर्फ यह कहना है कि तहसीलदार सदर अपनी आख्या प्रस्तुत कर चुके हैं किंतु अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय उसमें कमियां निकाल कर पीड़ित को क्षतिपूर्ति देने से भाग रहे हैं जो कि अवैध है अन्याय पूर्ण है असंवैधानिक है और प्रश्न गत प्रकरण में उस रिपोर्ट में जिन कमियों को दूर करने की बात कही गई है वह वही व्यक्ति दूर कर सकता है जिसने उस रिपोर्ट उस आख्या को प्रस्तुत किया है यहां पर अधिशासी अभियंता की कार्यशैली भ्रष्टाचार पूर्ण है और असंवैधानिक है जो कुछ भी वह कह रहे हैं वह नियमानुसार नहीं है रही जहां बात वह कह रहे हैं कि रिपोर्ट तैयार कराने की तो रिपोर्ट तो पहले से ही तैयार है सिर्फ उसकी कमियों को दूर करना है और कमियां दयानंद सिंह पुत्र सोभनाथ सिंह नहीं करेंगे उन कमियों को दूर करेंगे तहसीलदार सदर और उप जिलाधिकारी सदर ना की दयानंद सिंह श्रीमान जी यदि तहसील सदर अपनी आंख्या प्रस्तुत किया है तो उसमें जो कमियां हैं उसको तहसील सदर ही तो दूर करेगा किंतु यह साधारण सी बात विद्युत वितरण खंड के अभियंता एके सिंह को समझ में नहीं आ रही है सच तो यह है

Department -विद्युतComplaint Category -

नियोजित तारीख-22-12-2022शिकायत की स्थिति-

Level -जनपद स्तरPost -अधिशासी अभियन्‍ता,विघुत

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक22-12-2022 को फीडबैक:-I again repeat it that to say that someone is honest he may not be honest because honesty must reflect in his working style. The applicant is an anti corruption crusader his sole motive is tu reform the system. Still, executive Engineer electricity distribution division second is running away from the core issue. Executive Engineer is so honest that he does not use to entertain single application submitted under right to information act 2005. श्रीमान जी क्या अधिशासी अभियंता प्रार्थी को यह बताएंगे कि दयानंद सिंह किस तरह से उन अभिलेखों को शुद्ध करा सकते हैं जोकि उन्होंने अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय को नहीं भेजा है वे सभी अभिलेख तहसील सदर द्वारा अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय के सेवा में प्रेषित किए गए हैं। श्रीमान जी यदि वे दस्तावेज नियमानुसार नहीं है तो नियम के अनुसार अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय उन सभी दस्तावेजों को तहसील सदर को वापस कर दे तथा उसकी एक प्रतिलिपि प्रार्थी को प्रेषित कर दें अर्थात दयानंद सिंह पुत्र सोभनाथ सिंह को प्रेषित कर दें जिससे अग्रिम कार्यवाही हो सके। श्रीमान जी तहसील सदर द्वारा प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट यदि पूर्ण है तो उसका शुद्धिकरण भी तहसील सदर द्वारा ही किया जाएगा न कि प्रार्थी द्वारा । श्रीमान जी यदि अधिशासी अभियंता वास्तव में ईमानदार हैं तो यह बताएं कि वह डेढ़ वर्षो से क्या कर रहे थे इस विलंब का कारण क्या है किंतु यह सब नहीं बताएंगे। श्रीमान जी अधिशासी अभियंता प्रार्थी को यह भी बताएं की उन्होंने दयानंद सिंह पुत्र शोभनाथ सिंह को तहसीलदार सदर द्वारा प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट को शुद्ध करने हेतु क्यों आमंत्रित किया। श्रीमान जी क्या अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय की कार्यशैली रहस्य पूर्ण नहीं है अगर वे सभी चीजों को पारदर्शी तरीके से स्पष्ट नहीं करते हैं तो। श्रीमान जी प्रार्थी का आरोप अधिशासी अभियंता विद्युत वितरण खंड द्वितीय की कार्यशैली है वे अपनी कार्यशैली सुधारें। Sir, will the Executive Engineer tell the applicant that how Dayanand Singh can get those records rectified which he has not sent to Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II, all those records sent by Tehsil Sadar to the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II . Sir, if those documents are not according to the rules, then according to the rules, the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution division II, should return all those documents to Tehsil Sadar and send a copy of it to the applicant, i.e. send it to Dayanand Singh son of Sobhnath Singh, so that further action could be taken. May be Sir, if the report submitted by Tehsil Sadar is incorrect, then its correction will also be done by Tehsil Sadar only and not by the applicant. Sir, if the Executive Engineer is really honest, then tell what he was doing for one and a half years, what is the reason for this delay, but he will not tell all this. Mr. Executive Engineer also tell the applicant why he invited Dayanand Singh son of Shobhnath Singh to correct the report submitted by Tehsildar Sadar. Sir, is it the working style of Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division II full of mystery if they do not explain everything in a transparent manner then the allegations are automatically proved. The allegation of the applicant is based on the working style of Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Section II, he should improve his working style.

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी अग्रसारित दिनांक आदेश आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति आपत्ति देखे संलगनक

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 15-12-2022 अधिशासी अभियन्‍ता,विघुत-मिर्ज़ापुर,विद्युत 21-12-2022 On line complaint no 40019922027912 is disposed निस्तारित

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post