Information sought from office of DGP Lucknow regarding inaction of superintendent of police as FAA, in entertaining appeals of appellants

 



Additional S.P. /PIO and FAA/S.P. are performing zero role consequently there is anarchy in compliance of provisions of RTI Act 2005


C.O. City Mirzapur provided misleading information to Pritesh Kumar because S.P. Mirzapur did not comply order passed by U.P.H.R.C. Lucknow

Your RTI Request filed successfully.

Please note down the following details for further references.

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2022/60600

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 29-07-2022

RTI Fee Received    10

Online Reference Number IK0BUWVKV0

Transaction Status Success

Request filed with Director General of Police Office

 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  

Telephone Number 9454405121

Email-ID rti.dgphq-up@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Director General of Police Office

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant: -

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2022/60600

Date of Filing 29/07/2022

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1): -

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Sir, Government of Uttar Pradesh has nominated additional S.P. Mirzapur as public information officer and superintendent of police Mirzapur as the First Appellate Authoring to deal with the R.T.I. requests and subsequent appeals. It is quite obvious from the working of the superintendent of police Mirzapur, he never entertains the appeals submitted by the appellants. Here additional S.P. Mirzapur does not provide information to information seekers, but he directs the assistants to provide information to the information seekers which is illegal because information must be made available to information seekers under the signature of the PIO not APIO because section 20 is only applicable on PIO. Here PIO is also the nodal officer in the office of superintendent of police District-Mirzapur. In the name of nodal officer, how can PIO deal with the appeal of the appellants submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005? Whether superintendent of police District-Mirzapur can delegate his powers of First Appellate Authority to PIO cum nodal officer as done by him. Whether S.P. Mirzapur has not acted contrary to the government by delegating his powers of FAA to PIO cum nodal officer because powers FAA has been granted to him by the government of Uttar Pradesh by issuing proper notification. 

PIO in the office of director general of police Lucknow may provide the following information point wise as sought by the information seeker at the earliest or within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 

1-Provide the provisions of law /circulars/government orders /office memorandums which enable the superintendent of police Mirzapur to delegate his powers of First Appellate Authority to PIO cum nodal officer against whom appeals are made by the appellants. 

2-Provide the provisions of law /circulars/government orders /office memorandums which enable PIO to entertain appeals made against him for cryptic denials of sought information quite obvious from the attached document to the online RTI request. 

3-As the supreme monitoring body in the state, office of DGP may provide a copy of a single appeal submitted by the appellant entertained by superintendent of police Mirzapur by adopting logistic approach in the matter under his own signature. 

Right to information Act 2005 is failed to achieve its object because of incompetent public personnel and rampant corruption in the government machinery. How will transparency and accountability be ensured in the working of the public authority if there is no transparency and accountability in the dealings of the staff who are accountable for the ratification of the provisions of the Right to information act 2005?

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2022/60600

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 29/07/2022

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 29/07/2022

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name ADDL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Telephone Number 9454405121

Email-ID rti.dgphq-up@gov.in

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

2 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Right to information Act 2005 is failed to achieve its object because of incompetent public personnel and rampant corruption in the government machinery. How will transparency and accountability be ensured in the working of the public authority if there is no transparency and accountability in the dealings of the staff who are accountable for the ratification of the provisions of the Right to information act 2005?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right to Information act 2005 was brought up by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities but because of corruption it has been worthless for the citizens of this country.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post