Think about gravity of situation that whatever report has been made available to UPHRC by police will not be made available to complainant

COMPLAINT / CASE STATUS

SHRC, Uttar Pradesh

Case Details

Diary No 2304/IN/2021 Case / File No 2764/24/55/2021

Victim Name SUGUN SINGH Registration Date 20/09/2021

Action List (Click on Action given in blue color to view details)

Action No. Action Authority Action Date  

2 Dismissed in Limini NA 04/05/2022

1 Action Taken Report Called for THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MIRZAPUR 22/09/2021

Expand All Action List

HRCNet   HRCNet   HRCNet   HRCNet   HRCNet   HRCNet   HRCNet

Action

Action : Dismissed in Limini(Action No 2)

Action Date 04/05/2022

Authority , NA

Procceeding

आयोग के आदेश दिनांकित 22.09.2022 के अनुपालन में पुलिस अधीक्षक, नगर/नोडल अधिकारी, मीरजापुर द्वारा अपने पत्र दिनांकित 15.03.2022 के माध्यम से अवगत कराया गया है कि प्रकरण की जांच क्षेत्राधिकारी, नगर से करायी गयी है।

पत्रावली का परिशीलन किया गया तथा प्राप्त आख्या का अवलोकन किया गया। प्रस्तुत आख्या सन्तोषप्रद है। अतः आयोग स्तर पर अन्य किसी कार्यवाही की आवश्यकता नहीं है। प्रकरण में सम्पत्ति के बंटवारे का विवाद है, शान्ति व्यवस्था के दृृष्टिगत पुलिस द्वारा निरोधात्मक कार्यवाही की गयी है।

तद्नुसार, याचिका निस्तारित की जाती है

Complaint

Diary No 2304/IN/2021 Section CHPR

Language ENGLISH Mode BY INTERNET

Received Date 24/08/2021 Complaint Date 24/08/2021

Victim

Victim Name SUGUN SINGH Gender Female

Religion Hindu Cast General

Address VILLAGE BABURA POST BABURA

District MIRZAPUR State UTTAR PRADESH

HRCNet   HRCNet   HRCNet    

Complainant

Name YOGI M P SINGH

Address MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM, LAKSHMI BAIKUNTH MAHADEV MANDIR , JABALPUR ROAD

District MIRZAPUR State UTTAR PRADESH ( 231001 )

Incident

Incident Place KOTWALI VINDHYACHAL MIRZAPUR Incident Date 03/06/2021

Incident Category ABUSE OF POWER

Incident District MIRZAPUR Incident State UTTAR PRADESH

Incident Details

Submissions before UPHRC by widow Sugun Singh

An enquiry may be carried out by the competent staff of the government to check the blatant abuse of Cr. P.C. 107/116 by sub-inspector Ram Nivas Singh at the behest of Station Officer inspector Shesh Dhar Pandey. The matter concerns with the atrocity perpetrated by musclemen on the widow Sugun Singh W/O Late Krishna Kumar Singh, whose husband died last year during the Coronavirus pandemic. Whether it justified to implicate the widow and her two sons under section 107/116 of Cr. P.C. by the station officer Vindhyachal Kotwali on 03 June 2021. There is apprehension of breach of peace to station officer Kotwali Vindhyachal by the followings. 1-Sugun Singh W/O Late Krishna Kumar Singh, Age-55 years 2-Atul Kumar Singh S/O Late Krishna Kumar Singh age-21 years 3-Nitin Singh S/O Late Krishna Kumar Singh age-19 years Factual position is that when the criminal incident took place both Atul Kumar Singh and Nitin Singh were on their duty as both are doing private jobs. Undoubtedly, concerned sub-inspector Ram Nivas Singh blatantly misused the power and position. Prayer-Honourable chairman / Honourable member of the Uttar Pradesh human rights commission may direct superintendent of police District-Mirzapur to direct the competent staff to check the biased approach of the Sub-inspector Ram Nivas Singh as his integrity is under cloud since the beginning. Moreover, instead of taking action against vulnerable widow at the place of crime at the instigation of Ashok Kumar Singh alias Angad Singh, Vindhyachal police specially Sub-inspector Ram Nivas Singh might have to take action against the criminal elements who were abusing and assaulting the vulnerable widow. There is need of transparent and accountable enquiry so that wrongdoers may be exposed who misused their post and rank to achieve ulterior designs. Think about the gravity of situation that action was taken against justice seeker vulnerable widow and her bereaved son somehow earning two square meal and faults of widow are that she is seeking justice against injustice perpetrated by musclemen by colluding with local police. They means police concerned awarded the punishment for raising voice to seek justice. Whether it is good governance of Yogi Aditya Nath Sir?