Whether Yogi government glorifying its pseudo honesty will curb rampant corruption of Lucknow Development Authority? Dinesh Pratap Singh

 




Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2022/07408
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
10/02/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/03159 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 14/01/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh
श्री मान जी इस समय लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण चाहे जनसूचना के तहत आवेदन हो या शिकायत हो या कोई निवेदन हो हर किसी को इस आधार पर नजरअंदाज कर रही है की मामले में समिति गठित कर दी गयी है किन्तु न तो समिति के सन्दर्भ में कुछ बताएँगे और न ही प्रश्न गत प्रकरण को हल करने का ही प्रयास करेंगे तीन वर्षो से मामले में ताल मटोल कर रहे है क्या इसी तरह से योगी सरकार भ्र्ष्टाचार रोकती है
The matter concerns deep rooted corruption of L.D.A. and arbitrary denial of special working officer of L.D.A. to entertain the grievances of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh. An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh under Article 51A of the constitution of India.
According to the vice-chairman LDA-THIS MATTER IS NOT RELATED TO LDA but it is the frustration of the poor vice-chairman of LDA.
Think about the gravity of the situation that neither you understand English nor hindi and the matter you have been entertaining for more than three years now saying that this matter does not concern you. Whether it is not showing your insolence to the applicant and senior rank officers of the chief minister office monitoring the Jansunwai portal? Who did the registry of the impugned land cum plot without examining the papers which were due during the time of registry? They neither had the papers issued by the L.D.A. during the time of registry and still they do not have such papers as originally made available by L.D.A. It is quite obvious that you overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and executed the registry arbitrarily because of loose integrity and culture of corruption in the Lucknow Development Authority.
It is quite obvious that Lucknow development authority again ran away from the real issue of corruption through its apparent reply I that in the matter committee has been set up and findings of the committee will be final in the matter but when findings will be completed by the committee they are not disclosing near about 6 months passed in the matter when the committee had been set up by the Lucknow development authority. Think about the gravity of the situation that the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad was overlooked by the Lucknow development authority even after the objection of Dinesh Pratap Singh. Without deciding the title suit, the registry of the impugned land by overlooking the order of the high court reflects rampant corruption in the working . Still our chief minister yogi adityanath is claiming to provide good governance which is transparent and accountable to the people in the state of uttar pradesh.
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. vide registration number :- LKDPA/R/2021/80040 respectively. Registration Number LKDPA/A/2021/60173 Name Yogi M P Singh​ ​Date of Filing 10-10-2021 An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh Order of High court attached to R.T.I. communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the respondent number First who is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
10/02/2022
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
05222215127
Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)
Reminder Date
Remarks
10/02/2022
1- सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जैसा की उपरोक्त ने आदेश किया उपरोक्त आदेश का हिंदी रूपांतरण है प्रतिवादी संख्या चार से सात सीढ़ियों का ताला खोल दे जिससे याचिका कर्ता अनुराधा सिंह बाहर आ सके और सक्षम न्यायालय से उचित उपचार हासिल करे और उसके पश्चात उसे कही भी जाने की स्वतंत्रता होगी महोदय जैसा की उच्च न्यायालय ने आदेश दिया उसका अनुपालन सुनिश्चित करना प्रतिवादी १,२ और तीन की जिम्मेदारी थी और अब संलग्नक एक से स्पस्ट है निबंधन विलेख का संपादन लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण द्वारा किया जा चूका है श्री मान जी आप द्वारा किस तरह से अनुराधा सिंह द्वारा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के अनुपालन सुनिश्चित कराया गया २-यदि आप के पास उपरोक्त माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के क्रम में कोई सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जो अनुराधा सिंह की मालिकाना हक़ को पुष्ट करता हो तो उस आदेश की प्रति उपलब्ध कराये ३-यदि अनुराधा सिंह टाइटल सूट नहीं योजित की और गलत तरीके से निबंधन विलेख का संपादन करा लिया तो आप ने क्या कार्यवाही की विवरण उपलब्ध कराये 4-Provide the circular which exempts disclosure of information in the name of forming a committee. 5-Provide Letter of nomination of committee head and its members as informed by PIO already in the matter attached to it as Shraddha Chaudhari of L.D.A. as denied information
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

4 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. श्री मान जी इस समय लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण चाहे जनसूचना के तहत आवेदन हो या शिकायत हो या कोई निवेदन हो हर किसी को इस आधार पर नजरअंदाज कर रही है की मामले में समिति गठित कर दी गयी है किन्तु न तो समिति के सन्दर्भ में कुछ बताएँगे और न ही प्रश्न गत प्रकरण को हल करने का ही प्रयास करेंगे तीन वर्षो से मामले में ताल मटोल कर रहे है क्या इसी तरह से योगी सरकार भ्र्ष्टाचार रोकती है

    ReplyDelete
  2. Undoubtedly, Yogi government is failed to curb the rampant corruption in the public offices. This is the root cause in the new wave electorates of the the government of Uttar Pradesh are exercising their franchise against this government.
    People in the state of Uttar Pradesh are well apprised with the activities of the government functionaries.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why L.D.A. bypassed High court order? It reflects rampant corruption in the government and judiciary as well.
    1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.

    2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.

    3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Undoubtedly it reflects deep rooted corruption in the working of Lucknow Development Authority.
    Provide the circular which exempts disclosure of information in the name of forming a committee. 5-Provide Letter of nomination of committee head and its members as informed by PIO already in the matter attached to it as Shraddha Chaudhari of L.D.A. as denied information

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post