Mirzapur consumer forum is reverting consumer grievances arbitrarily because of corrupt dealings and arbitrary working style of its staff




Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Why do the Mirzapur district consumer forum returns the applications of the aggrieved consumers arbitrarily reflects lawlessness and anarchy in the working of public authority?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 19 November 2021 at 11:41
To: up-sforum@nic.in, confo-mi-up@nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup <hgovup@up.nic.in>, csup@up.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of historic judgement delivered by the apex court of India. Accountability must be ensured in order to achieve good governance.  
Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union (1971 (1) All E.R. 1148) observed "The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration". In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree (1974 LCR 120) it was observed: "Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of justice". Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision taker to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived at". Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the "inscrutable face of the sphinx", it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible for the Courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, reasons at least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before Court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made, in other words, a speaking out. The "inscrutable face of a sphinx" is ordinarily incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.
The most surprising thing is that concerned staff of consumer forum District-Mirzapur instead of providing their own reason in the comment only copied the some parrot reply as recourse to revert each case submitted online by the aggrieved consumers. Here office staffs are itself a stumbling block for the aggrieved consumers in seeking justice against the violations of consumer rights of citizens.
With due respect, the applicant invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-1-I pray before the Honourable Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-I pray before the Honourable Sir to ensure that no arbitrary action may be taken in the serious matter as follows
S.No. Ref Number Complainant Opposite Party Claim Amount View Revert Remarks Edit
1 A21080002736 YOGI M P SINGH PROPRIETOR I KALL COMPANY ₹6,299.00
3-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that consumer forum District-Mirzapur reverts the consumer complaints with the following parrot reply without taking the perusal of the subject matter which is arbitrary and illegal. 
S.No. Remarks Revert by
1 Incomplete Document FORUM
2 Incomplete Document FORUM
3 Incomplete Document FORUM
4 Incomplete Document FORUM
5 Incomplete Document FORUM
6 Incomplete Document FORUM
7 Incomplete Document FORUM
8 Incomplete Document FORUM
9 Incomplete Document FORUM
10 File Incomplete Document FORUM
11 Document incomplete FORUM
4-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that documents attached to the grievance are also attached to this email representation. I challenge it that my application is reverted by the concerned staff because of corruption in the dealings of the concerned mandate. Whatever expected from the consumer, I have submitted. 
5-I pray before the Honourable Sir that according to section 4 (1) (d) of Right to Information Act 2005, Every public authority shall—provide reasons for its administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons.
If the matter is not reaching the concerned table because of such corrupt sheep in a cryptic manner, then how can the government claim honesty in the system where corruption is rampant. 

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा | 


             इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-19/11/2021           Yours sincerely


                                   Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 

Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar

 Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
.
2 attachments
Screenshot (194).png
87K
A21080002736.pdf
1491K