Dinesh Pratap Singh sought information from District Judge Lucknow regarding his communication dated 13/10/2019 under RTI Act 2005

Track Consignment
Quick helpHelp
Indicates a required field.
Consignment Number
EU253755445IN
Booked At Booked On Destination Pincode Tariff Article Type Delivery Location Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur HO 18/11/2021 14:28:27 226001 47.20 Inland Speed Post Lucknow GPO 23/11/2021 16:57:01
Event Details For : EU253755445INCurrent Status : Item Delivery Confirmed
Date Time Office Event
23/11/2021 16:57:01 Lucknow GPO Item Delivery Confirmed
23/11/2021 10:55:37 Lucknow GPO Out for Delivery
22/11/2021 08:27:17 Lucknow GPO Item Received
21/11/2021 06:18:06 Lucknow NSH Item Dispatched
21/11/2021 03:34:39 Lucknow NSH Item Bagged
20/11/2021 18:44:27 Lucknow NSH Item Received
19/11/2021 17:08:25 Mail Agency Allahabad RMS Item Dispatched
19/11/2021 16:10:40 Mail Agency Allahabad RMS Item Received
19/11/2021 15:39:57 Allahabad NSH Item Dispatched
19/11/2021 14:34:13 Allahabad NSH Item Bagged
19/11/2021 12:58:53 Allahabad NSH Item Received
18/11/2021 17:25:54 Mirzapur HO Item Dispatched
18/11/2021 16:35:39 Mirzapur HO Item Bagged
18/11/2021 14:28:27 Mirzapur HO Item Booked
Representation of Dinesh Pratap Singh dated 13/10/2019 reached office of D.J. in 3 days ipso facto but not reached ACJM III in two years

An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to seek information regarding the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow.

To

                     District Judge Lucknow

                 ADDRESS:- District & Sessions Court Lucknow

           Kaisarbagh;  P.S.-Wazeerganj;

                                          Lucknow-226001 (Uttar Pradesh) India

Subject-To seek information regarding the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow. Colour photographs of the communication attached to this RTI Application as first two pages of the attached document. For more information, vide attached annexure 1 and 2. 

Most respectfully sheweth that

1-Annexure 3 is the receipt of postal department addressed to District Judge Lucknow and annexure 4 is speed post tracking of postal department showing that communication despatched on 13/10/2019 and received in the office of District Judge Lucknow on 16/10/2019. For more feedback, vide annexure 3 and 4.

2-Annexure 5,6 and 7 are the quotes in the order dated  07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad. 

Sought Information-Applicant seeks following information point-wise.

1-Please provide notings made by the competent staffs of the district court Lucknow on aforementioned representation cum questionnaire. 

2-Please provide the current status of the communication of the information seeker dated-13/10/2019 addressed to District Judge Lucknow.

3-Right to reason is indispensable part of sound judicial system consequently information seeker is seeking reason if communication is not reached to its destination. 

4-Please provide the reason of not displaying case number 269 of the year 2009 under E-court scheme which ambitious scheme of the government to computerize entire court cases and government is spending huge funds for this purpose. 

Date-18-10-2021                                          Yours sincerely

                                                    

                                                          Dinesh Pratap Singh C/O Yogi M. P. Singh 

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Requisite fee as prescribed under High court RTI rule payable to district judge Lucknow is attached to this application. 


Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Please provide the reason of not displaying case number 269 of the year 2009 under E-court scheme which ambitious scheme of the government to computerize entire court cases and government is spending huge funds for this purpose.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post