Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 05/08/2021
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 08/10/2021
Reply :- INROMATION ATTACHED WITH ENCLOSER
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9918001643
Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number LKDPA/R/2021/60288
Date of Filing 05/08/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number 91-7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought This R.T.I. communique is submitted on behalf of the Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.
1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.
2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.
3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.
* Concerned PIO Rajesh Shukla
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number LKDPA/A/2021/60141
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 17/09/2021
Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 24/09/2021
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 9918001927, Email Id:-
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9918001643
Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number LKDPA/R/2021/60288
Request Registration Date 05/08/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , District Mirzapur, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number -7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Rajesh Shukla
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number LKDPA/R/2021/60288 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 05/08/2021Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 27/08/2021 Detail is attached to the appeal in the PDF form. According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005-Subject to the proviso to subsection (2) of section 5 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9:It is 17 Sept 2021 today which means 1 month 13 days passed, but PIO did not provide any information which means PIO denied information as quite obvious from the subsection 2 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under subsection (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have refused the request. Consequently, PIO violated subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.Since the matter concerns with the deep-rooted corruption, therefore public information officer of the public authority Lucknow Development Authority only playing the cunning tricks to conceal information so that corrupt staffs of the Lucknow Development Authority may be shielded. Here corrupt staffs of the public authority Lucknow Development Authority not only committed the contempt of court by making the mockery of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad but also committed other corrupt activities which maligned the image of the public authority Lucknow Development Authority. Undoubtedly, they may be punished, but only when current staffs may not shield them. It is well established truth that only corrupt shields corrupt. Our motive is good governance, but corruption prevailed in the government machinery creating hurdle in the path to achieve its own ulterior design. Think about the gravity of situation that mobile phone number given on the portal is never picked up by the PIO concerned.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.
ReplyDelete2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.
3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.