Think about corruption in office of S.D.M. Sadar that recovery of Rs.1000 of could not be made but seeking affidavit for other enquiry



Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/61941
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
25/10/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Herewith on page 5 of the attached PDF document to this representation is the communication of Area Food Officer, Tahsil Sadar acting under S.D.M. Sadar. Detail of this communication is Letter number-665 year 2020-21 dated-18 Oct 2021. You sough affidavit of the applicant but applicant is seeking feedback regarding the compliance of the order already passed by the subdivisional magistrate Sadar as follows. Please take a glance of page 3 and 4 of the attached documents to the representation which is communication of Vikas Kumar Sonakar Supply inspector Chhanbey addressed to District supply officer Mirzapur approved by latter on 23/03/2021 categorically states that irregularity found in the coordination of the Control rate shop Adampur consequently S.D.M. Sadar imposed penalty of Rs.1000 and reprimanded   not to repeat such irregularity. 
More explanation is available on page 4. Since you did not ensure recovery of the imposed penalty so running away from providing the information concerning with the compliance of the order made by the S.D.M. Sadar in the matter quite obvious from the attached documents. Undoubtedly, it reflects rampant corruption in the working of the S.D.M. Sadar that because of corruption his orders are not complied by those who are to comply and those who are to ensure compliance. Undoubtedly it may be part of the record if compliance was made. O God save us from this giant corruption. Whether recovery of Rs.1000 from the licensee will not be made by the sub divisional magistrate as ordered aforementioned? That was merely a drama done in the office of the subdivisional magistrate ipso facto. Now it has been evident that more emphasis of the office of sub divisional magistrate Sadar is to carry out enquiry not to recover pecuniary penalty imposed by S.D.M. Sadar on the licensee of the control rate shop. Whether it is not signalling anarchy in the working of sub divisional magistrate Sadar? Whether such cryptic activities on the part of staff of Tahsil Sadar to seek affidavit for other enquiry in the same matter ipso facto instead of taking action in the earlier passed penalty did not indicate lawlessness and anarchy in the working.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
25/10/2021
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
संदर्भ संख्या : 40019921023625 , दिनांक - 25 Oct 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40019921023625

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Herewith on page 5 of the attached PDF document to this representation is the communication of Area Food Officer, Tahsil Sadar acting under S.D.M. Sadar. Detail of this communication is Letter number-665 year 2020-21 dated-18 Oct 2021. You sough affidavit of the applicant but applicant is seeking feedback regarding the compliance of the order already passed by the sub divisional magistrate Sadar as follows. Please take a glance of page 3 and 4 of the attached documents to the representation which is communication of Vikas Kumar Sonakar Supply inspector Chhanbey addressed to District supply officer Mirzapur approved by latter on 23/03/2021 categorically states that irregularity found in the coordination of the Control rate shop Adampur consequently S.D.M. Sadar imposed penalty of Rs.1000 and reprimanded   not to repeat such irregularity.  More explanation is available on page 4. Since you did not ensure recovery of the imposed penalty so running away from providing the information concerning with the compliance of the order made by the S.D.M. Sadar in the matter quite obvious from the attached documents. Undoubtedly, it reflects rampant corruption in the working of the S.D.M. Sadar that because of corruption his orders are not complied by those who are to comply and those who are to ensure compliance. Undoubtedly it may be part of the record if compliance was made. O God save us from this giant corruption. Whether recovery of Rs.1000 from the licensee will not be made by the sub divisional magistrate as ordered aforementioned? That was merely a drama done in the office of the subdivisional magistrate ipso facto. Now it has been evident that more emphasis of the office of sub divisional magistrate Sadar is to carry out enquiry not to recover pecuniary penalty imposed by S.D.M. Sadar on the licensee of the control rate shop. Whether it is not signalling anarchy in the working of sub divisional magistrate Sadar? Whether such cryptic activities on the part of staff of Tahsil Sadar to seek affidavit for other enquiry in the same matter ipso facto instead of taking action in the earlier passed penalty did not indicate lawlessness and anarchy in the working. 

Department -खाद्य एवं रसद विभागComplaint Category -

नियोजित तारीख-24-11-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-

Level -तहसील स्तरPost -पूर्ति निरीक्षक

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अग्रसारित विवरण :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी प्राप्त/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 25-10-2021 24-11-2021 पूर्ति निरीक्षक-सदर,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,खाद्य एवं रसद विभाग अनमार्क
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Since you did not ensure recovery of the imposed penalty so running away from providing the information concerning with the compliance of the order made by the S.D.M. Sadar in the matter quite obvious from the attached documents. Undoubtedly, it reflects rampant corruption in the working of the S.D.M. Sadar that because of corruption his orders are not complied by those who are to comply and those who are to ensure compliance. Undoubtedly it may be part of the record if compliance was made.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post