Provided information by the office of superintendent of police to 71 years old lady Shiv Kumari is incomplete and misleading



Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2021/60027

Name Shiv Kumari

Date of Filing 31-10-2021

Request filed with SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   * Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60034

Request Registration Date 16/08/2021

* Name Shiv Kumari

Gender Male

* Address Jangi Road , Kotwali Katra, Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Illiterate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-8115605066

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information

* PIO of Public Authority approached mahesh singh atri

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60034 Name Shiv Kumari Date of Filing 16/08/2021 Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 29/10/2021Reply :- answer to shiv kumari Detail is attached to the appeal in the PDF form. According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005-Subject to the proviso to subsection (2) of section 5 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9. Your PIO attached reply dated 26 Oct 2021 and on the portal 29 Oct 2021 which means incomplete information was provided after two months 10 days which is the violation of subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

 Information sought by applicant- 1- Please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 of accepting the repeated report of chauki in-charge by overlooking the affidavit of the information seeker. 

2-Information seeker is 70 years old woman senior citizen, if chauki in charge looking into facts of the case. Please provide the records which proves information seeker took price of the land and house under controversy. 

3-Ground of rejection of transparent and accountable investigation after registering F.I.R. is the biased approach of information seeker because information seeker is a tool in the hand of her son with him, she is living undoubtedly baseless. 

Please provide the reason how police are deeming justified and non-misleading act of the registry carried out without paying single penny to information seeker and rights of other sons encroached or you can say blatantly violated. 

Whether the integrity of the police is not under cloud quite obvious from the circumstantial evidences. 

You provided information that opposition provided 2 Lakh 50 thousand in cash but remained fail to provide evidences as sought under point 2. 

Both C.O. and S.P. City are monitoring bodies; they know well that reports are submitted according to allegations made in representations so incomplete information under point 2 and no information made available under point 1 and 3. 

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2021/60027

Name Shiv Kumari

Date of Filing 31/10/2021

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 31/10/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60034

Name Shiv Kumari

Date of Filing 16/08/2021

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 29/10/2021

Reply :- answer to shiv kumari

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60034

Date of Filing 16/08/2021

* Name Shiv Kumari

Gender Female

* Address Jangi Road , Kotwali Katra, Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Illiterate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-8115605066

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought महोदय प्रार्थिनी के हस्ताक्षरित प्रत्यावेदन को नजर अंदाज किया गया जिसमे प्रार्थिनी ने स्पस्ट रूप से लिखा है की प्रार्थिनी भ्रमित और गुमराह नहीं बल्कि उसे पुलिस गुमराह कर रही हैप्रार्थिनी भ्रमित नहीं है वल्कि सम्बंधित पुलिस गोलमटोल जवाब दे कर उच्चाधिकारिओं और प्रार्थिनी को भ्रमित करना चाहती है श्री मान जी पुलिस द्वारा तारीख बदल कर पुनः वही रिपोर्ट लगाना इस बात का द्योतक है की सम्बंधित पुलिस विषयवस्तु का परिशीलन ही नहीं कर रही है जो की सम्बंधित की लापरवाही प्रदर्शित कर रहा है श्री मान जी निवेदन विषयवस्तु का परिशीलनोपरांत गुण दोष के आधार पर सम्बंधित पुलिस रिपोर्ट लगाए जिससे ब्यथा  का गुणवत्ता पूर्ण निस्तारण हो For more detail, vide attached PDF document to the grievance.

 1-During police investigation, application of mind according submissions of the complaints by the investigation officer is the essential component of the investigation. According to report dated 04 Aug 2021 information seeker is puppet in the hand of her son with whom she is living undoubtedly baseless and inconsistent report. Latter on information seeker submitted affidavit under her signature that she is neither confused nor under pressure of her son but report submitted dated 09 Aug 2021 is the same parrot reply. 

Please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 of accepting the repeated report of chauki in-charge by overlooking the affidavit of the information seeker.

 2-Information seeker is 70 years old woman senior citizen, if Chauki in charge looking into facts of the case.

 Please provide the records which proves information seeker took price of the land and house under controversy. 

3-Ground of rejection of transparent and accountable investigation after registering F.I.R. is the biased approach of information seeker because information seeker is a tool in the hand of her son with him she is living undoubtedly baseless. 

Please provide the reason how police is deeming justified and non misleading act of the registry carried out without paying single penny to information seeker and rights of other sons encroached or you can say blatantly violated. 

Whether the integrity of the police is not under cloud quite obvious from the circumstantial evidences. 

* Concerned PIO mahesh singh atri

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. During police investigation, application of mind according submissions of the complaints by the investigation officer is the essential component of the investigation. According to report dated 04 Aug 2021 information seeker is puppet in the hand of her son with whom she is living undoubtedly baseless and inconsistent report. Latter on information seeker submitted affidavit under her signature that she is neither confused nor under pressure of her son but report submitted dated 09 Aug 2021 is the same parrot reply.

    Please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 of accepting the repeated report of chauki in-charge by overlooking the affidavit of the information seeker.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post