Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing, 21/08/2021
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 13/10/2021
Reply :- please find the attachment.
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60244
Date of Filing 21/08/2021
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Order of High court attached to communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.
1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned.
2-C.O. Cantt may provide information about how Ashiana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court.
3-High court categorically stated in its order to seek civil remedy, but subsequent proceedings are criminal and Dr Beenu Singh instigated illegally to participate in it. Provide reason.
My appeal Registration Number PROLW/A/2020/60005 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 09/08/2020 Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 10/08/2021 Reply :- Sir Your Request information Related to Police Commissioner office Lucknow. and RTI Request Registration No. (आरटीआई अनुरोध पंजीकरण संख्या) : PROLW/R/2020/60002 Transferred to Lucknow on date 27-10-2020 Quite obvious that my appeal was disposed of on 10/08/2021 by the first appellate authority who was a layman violated subsection 1 of section 19 but when I filed appeal as information made available on 10/08/2021 regarding transfer and disposal of R.T.I. Application but learned FAA in the office of public authority Police commissioner Lucknow immediately stuck to subsection 1 of section 19 of RTI Act 2005 that time to appeal within 30 days exhausted, but it was unfortunate that this FAA was not in the office of public authority POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW.
After all, PIO may provide the aforementioned sought information as not provided in the earlier R.T.I. Application because he could not understand English language but its Hindi version with comments is attached to RTI request.
* Concerned PIO DIGAMBER KUSHWAHA
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2021/60122
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 06/10/2021
Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 12/10/2021
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 9454400531, Email Id:- dcphqoffice@gmail.com
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60244
Request Registration Date 21/08/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached DIGAMBER KUSHWAHA
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60244 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 21/08/2021 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 23/08/2021 Because of incompetent police personnel and rampant corruption, not single information is available to common people in the state of Uttar Pradesh. For more information, vide attached PDF document to this appeal. According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005-Subject to the proviso to subsection (2) of section 5 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9:It is 06 October 2021 today which means 1 month 13 days passed, but PIO did not provide any information which means PIO denied information as quite obvious from the subsection 2 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under subsection (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have refused the request. Consequently, PIO violated subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Since the matter concerns the deep-rooted corruption, therefore the public information officer of the public authority Lucknow Police commissioner only played the cunning tricks to conceal information so that corrupt staff of the Lucknow police commissioner office may be shielded. Here corrupt staff of the public authority Lucknow police commissioner office not only committed the contempt of court by making the mockery of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad but also committed other corrupt activities which maligned the image of the public authority Lucknow police commissioner office. Undoubtedly, they may be punished, but feasible only when current staff may not shield them. It is a well established truth that only corrupt shields corrupt. Our motive is good governance, but corruption prevailed in the government machinery, creating hurdles in the path to achieve its own ulterior design. Think about the gravity of the situation that the mobile phone number given on the portal is never picked up by the PIO concerned. If tried numerous times and mobile picked up then no substantial response is made by them.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Order of High court attached to communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.
ReplyDelete1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned.
2-C.O. Cantt may provide information about how Ashiana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court.