In the good governance of Yogi Aditya Nath, FAA Commissionerate is not picking up phone calls of aggrieved appellants ipso facto



Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
PIO only misled in the name of providing information to the information seeker and FAA is not picking up mobile phone given as his details on the RTI portal.
1 message
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:22 PM
To: jansuchanalko@gmail.com, dcphqoffice@gmail.com, sec.sic@up.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, cmup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, Presidents Secretariat <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cp-pol.lu@up.gov.in, cocant.lu-up@gov.in, jcp-pollo.lu@up.gov.in
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2021/60122 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 06/10/2021 Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 12/10/2021 Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 9454400531, Email Id:- dcphqoffice@gmail.com

बर्बाद गुलिस्ताँ करने को बस एक ही उल्लू काफ़ी था 

हर शाख़ पे उल्लू बैठा है अंजाम-ए-गुलिस्ताँ क्या होगा 

With due respect, the applicant invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1-I pray before the Honourable Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that following information sought by the information seeker as follows
* Description of Information Sought Order of High court attached to communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. 

1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned. 

2-C.O. Cant may provide information about how Ashiana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court. 

3-High court categorically stated in its order to seek civil remedy, but subsequent proceedings are criminal and Dr Beenu Singh instigated illegally to participate in it. Provide reason. 

For more details, visit the following link.

https://www.yogi.systems/2021/10/lucknow-police-took-under-teeth-high.html

3-I pray before the Honourable Sir that concerned denied aforementioned information cryptically  earlier, as follows 

My appeal Registration Number PROLW/A/2020/60005 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 09/08/2020 Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 10/08/2021 Reply :- Sir Your Request information Related to Police Commissioner office Lucknow. and RTI Request Registration No. (आरटीआई अनुरोध पंजीकरण संख्या) : PROLW/R/2020/60002 Transferred to Lucknow on date 27-10-2020 Quite obvious that my appeal was disposed of on 10/08/2021 by the first appellate authority who was a layman violated subsection 1 of section 19 but when I filed appeal as information made available on 10/08/2021 regarding transfer and disposal of R.T.I. Application but learned FAA in the office of public authority Police commissioner Lucknow immediately stuck to subsection 1 of section 19 of RTI Act 2005 that time to appeal within 30 days exhausted, but it was unfortunate that this FAA was not in the office of public authority POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW. 


After all, PIO may provide the aforementioned sought information as not provided in the earlier R.T.I. Application because he could not understand English language, but its Hindi version with comments is attached to RTI request.

4-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that Denial of sought information by the public information officer in the office of the police commissioner Lucknow as he could not understand the contents because it was written in the English language, and he did not take the perusal of the attached document to the R.T.I. Application. Therefore, I am providing the Hindi version of the sought Information.  

Description of Information Sought Order of High court attached to communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.

1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned.

2-C.O. Cantt may provide information about, how Ashiyana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court.

3-High court categorically stated in its order to seek civil remedy, but subsequent proceedings are criminal and Dr Beenu Singh instigating illegally to participate in it. Provide reason.

 

महोदय ऐसा प्रतीत होता है की जनसूचना अधिकारी महोदय को आंग्ल भाषा का तनिक भी ज्ञान नहीं है अन्यथा वे सूचना उपलब्ध कराते 

विन्दु एक में माँगी गई सूचना है सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जैसा की उपरोक्त ने आदेश किया उपरोक्त आदेश का हिंदी रूपांतरण है प्रतिवादी संख्या चार से सात सीढ़ियों का ताला खोल दे जिससे याचिका कर्ता अनुराधा सिंह बाहर आ सके और सक्षम न्यायालय से उचित उपचार हासिल करे और उसके पश्चात उसे कही भी जाने की स्वतंत्रता होगी 

महोदय आप कह रहे है की सूचना प्रार्थी आदेश माननीय उच्च न्यायालय से नियमानुसार प्राप्त करे महोदय आप संलग्नक ४ , ५ और ६ का अवलोकन करे जो माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश की प्रति है जिसको प्रार्थी द्वारा नियमानुसार ही प्राप्त किया गया है किन्तु यहां माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के क्रम में जो सक्षम न्यायालय से अनुराधा सिंह द्वारा उपचार हासिल किया गया है जिसके आधार पर आशियाना थाना प्रार्थी दिनेश प्रताप सिंह और उसके परिवार पर भिन्न भिन्न भा. द. वि. की धाराएं लगाईं है उसकी प्रति माँगी गयी है 


यदि अनुराधा सिंह सक्षम न्यायालय गई ही नहीं तो आशियाना पुलिस को सक्षम न्यायालय का अधिकार किसने दिया जो टाइटल विवाद हल करके अनुराधा सिंह को गृह स्वामिनी बना दिया तीसरा विन्दु भी आप नहीं समझे तो आप सूचना क्या देंगे अध्ययन करें ज्ञान हासिल करे योग्यता भी कुछ होती है 

5-I pray before the Honourable Sir that information seeker/appellant /applicant made calls after interval of 15 minutes on the public mobile number given on the RTI portal for appellant as contact details of FAA but unfortunately concerned First Appellate Authority in the office of police commissioner Lucknow did not pick up the phone as he did not deem fit to pick up the phone call of a common man. 

Earlier sought information denied as 

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 10/08/2021


Reply :- Sir Your Reqeest information Related to Police Commissioner office lucknow. and RTI Request Registration No. (आरटीआई अनुरोध पंजीकरण संख्या) : PROLW/R/2020/60002 Transferred to Lucknow on date 27-10-2020



खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |


             इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-14/10/2021                                                   Yours sincerely


                                                      Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,

Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar

 Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. 1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned.

    2-C.O. Cant may provide information about how Ashiana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court.

    3-High court categorically stated in its order to seek civil remedy, but subsequent proceedings are criminal and Dr Beenu Singh instigated illegally to participate in it. Provide reason.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post